PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^DJUSFN vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^DJUSFN vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (^DJUSFN) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

^DJUSFN vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^DJUSFN
Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index
-8.20%13.51%24.04%13.28%-15.59%29.76%-2.99%29.38%-11.00%17.44%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
-3.95%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^DJUSFN achieves a -8.20% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's -3.95% return. Over the past 10 years, ^DJUSFN has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 9.60%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 12.24% annualized return.


^DJUSFN

1D
0.09%
1M
-4.01%
YTD
-8.20%
6M
-6.04%
1Y
1.64%
3Y*
14.65%
5Y*
7.19%
10Y*
9.60%

^GSPC

1D
0.72%
1M
-4.45%
YTD
-3.95%
6M
-2.02%
1Y
16.73%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*
12.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^DJUSFN vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^DJUSFN
^DJUSFN Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
^DJUSFN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^DJUSFN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
^DJUSFN Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
^DJUSFN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
^DJUSFN Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^DJUSFN vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (^DJUSFN) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^DJUSFN^GSPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.09

0.92

-0.83

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.25

1.41

-1.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.21

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.12

1.41

-1.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.38

6.61

-6.23

^DJUSFN vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^DJUSFN Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^DJUSFN and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^DJUSFN^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

0.92

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.61

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.68

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.46

-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between ^DJUSFN and ^GSPC is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Drawdowns

^DJUSFN vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^DJUSFN drawdown since its inception was -80.50%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^DJUSFN and ^GSPC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


^DJUSFN^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.50%

-56.78%

-23.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.22%

-12.14%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.56%

-25.43%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.78%

-33.92%

-8.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.53%

-5.78%

-4.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.24%

-10.75%

-6.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.31%

2.60%

+1.71%

Volatility

^DJUSFN vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (^DJUSFN) is 4.42%, while S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) has a volatility of 5.37%. This indicates that ^DJUSFN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


^DJUSFN^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.42%

5.37%

-0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.36%

9.55%

+0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.26%

18.33%

-0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.79%

16.90%

+0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.60%

18.05%

+2.55%