^DJT vs. FNPIX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Dow Jones Transportation Average (^DJT) and ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund (FNPIX).

FNPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Jun 18, 2000.

Performance

^DJT vs. FNPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dow Jones Transportation Average (^DJT) and ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund (FNPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

^DJT vs. FNPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
^DJT Dow Jones Transportation Average	9.06%	9.19%	-0.02%	18.72%	-18.73%	31.75%	14.73%	18.87%	-13.59%	17.34%
FNPIX ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund	-14.97%	16.39%	38.51%	18.34%	-23.84%	57.11%	-9.83%	46.49%	-17.23%	27.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^DJT achieves a 9.06% return, which is significantly higher than FNPIX's -14.97% return. Over the past 10 years, ^DJT has underperformed FNPIX with an annualized return of 9.15%, while FNPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.37% annualized return.

^DJT

• 1D: 1.72%
• 1M: -4.20%
• YTD: 9.06%
• 6M: 20.93%
• 1Y: 28.08%
• 3Y*: 9.45%
• 5Y*: 5.12%
• 10Y*: 9.15%

FNPIX

• 1D: 3.22%
• 1M: -5.35%
• YTD: -14.97%
• 6M: -12.36%
• 1Y: -4.60%
• 3Y*: 19.25%
• 5Y*: 9.98%
• 10Y*: 13.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

^DJT vs. FNPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^DJT

^DJT Risk / Return Rank: 71
^DJT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
^DJT Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
^DJT Omega Ratio Rank: 70
^DJT Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
^DJT Martin Ratio Rank: 68

FNPIX

FNPIX Risk / Return Rank: 3
FNPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
FNPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
FNPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
FNPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
FNPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^DJT vs. FNPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dow Jones Transportation Average (^DJT) and ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund (FNPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	^DJT	FNPIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.07	-0.17	+1.24
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.62	-0.04	+1.66
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	0.99	+0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.81	-0.14	+1.94
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.86	-0.40	+6.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

^DJT vs. FNPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^DJT Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is higher than the FNPIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^DJT and FNPIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	^DJT	FNPIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.07	-0.17	+1.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23	0.37	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39	0.44	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.09	+0.29

Correlation

The correlation between ^DJT and FNPIX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Drawdowns

^DJT vs. FNPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^DJT drawdown since its inception was -60.92%, smaller than the maximum FNPIX drawdown of -93.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^DJT and FNPIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	^DJT	FNPIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.92%	-93.14%	+32.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.71%	-22.37%	+6.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.58%	-37.80%	+8.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.06%	-58.23%	+16.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.84%	-18.58%	+13.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.03%	-36.37%	+23.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.84%	7.59%	-2.75%

Volatility

^DJT vs. FNPIX - Volatility Comparison

Dow Jones Transportation Average (^DJT) has a higher volatility of 7.51% compared to ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund (FNPIX) at 7.12%. This indicates that ^DJT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	^DJT	FNPIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.51%	7.12%	+0.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.06%	17.15%	-2.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.29%	28.98%	-2.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.82%	27.41%	-4.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.33%	30.69%	-7.36%