^AXAF vs. VOO
^AXAF (S&P/ASX All Australian 50 Index) is an index, while VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, ^AXAF returned 5.52%/yr vs 16.51%/yr for VOO. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
^AXAF vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
^AXAF is traded in AUD, while VOO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VOO values have been converted to AUD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ^AXAF achieves a 2.98% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 4.45% return. Over the past 10 years, ^AXAF has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 5.52%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.51% annualized return.
^AXAF
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- YTD
- 2.98%
- 6M
- 2.15%
- 1Y
- 2.98%
- 3Y*
- 7.17%
- 5Y*
- 4.02%
- 10Y*
- 5.52%
VOO
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 1.73%
- YTD
- 4.45%
- 6M
- 3.98%
- 1Y
- 15.58%
- 3Y*
- 19.40%
- 5Y*
- 15.24%
- 10Y*
- 16.51%
^AXAF vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
^AXAF S&P/ASX All Australian 50 Index | 2.98% | 3.37% | 7.32% | 9.08% | -2.79% | 12.67% | -4.45% | 19.01% | -5.61% | 4.42% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 4.45% | 9.27% | 37.55% | 26.42% | -12.77% | 36.35% | 7.93% | 31.98% | 5.74% | 12.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between ^AXAF and VOO is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
^AXAF vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
^AXAF
VOO
^AXAF vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P/ASX All Australian 50 Index (^AXAF) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ^AXAF | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.29 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.23 | 1.39 | -1.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.48 | 3.91 | -3.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
^AXAF vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ^AXAF drawdown since its inception was -51.77%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -24.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^AXAF and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ^AXAF | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.77% | -24.78% | -26.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.21% | -11.29% | +3.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.96% | -17.50% | +3.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.52% | -21.45% | +6.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.42% | -24.78% | -10.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.48% | -0.27% | -3.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.36% | -3.73% | -12.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.95% | 4.00% | -0.05% |
Volatility
^AXAF vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
S&P/ASX All Australian 50 Index (^AXAF) has a higher volatility of 3.85% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.02%. This indicates that ^AXAF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ^AXAF | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.85% | 3.02% | +0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.65% | 7.83% | +1.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.07% | 10.20% | +1.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.58% | 14.54% | -1.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.78% | 16.29% | -1.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
^AXAF and VOO have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
^AXAF has higher volatility (3.85%) compared to VOO (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^AXAF dropped -51.77% vs VOO's -24.78%.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ^AXAF and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer