PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^AXAF vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^AXAF vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in S&P/ASX All Australian 50 Index (^AXAF) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

^AXAF is traded in AUD, while VOO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VOO values have been converted to AUD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^AXAF achieves a 1.70% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 3.82% return. Over the past 10 years, ^AXAF has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 4.86%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.95% annualized return.


^AXAF

1D
-1.24%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
1.70%
6M
3.32%
1Y
2.03%
3Y*
6.29%
5Y*
3.63%
10Y*
4.86%

VOO

1D
-0.24%
1M
5.60%
YTD
3.82%
6M
2.72%
1Y
16.13%
3Y*
19.37%
5Y*
15.79%
10Y*
15.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^AXAF vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^AXAF
S&P/ASX All Australian 50 Index
1.70%3.37%7.32%9.08%-2.79%12.67%-4.45%19.01%-5.61%4.42%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
3.82%9.27%37.55%26.42%-12.77%36.35%7.93%31.98%5.74%12.50%

Correlation

The correlation between ^AXAF and VOO is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.05

The correlation between ^AXAF and VOO shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.06 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^AXAF vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^AXAF
^AXAF Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
^AXAF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^AXAF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
^AXAF Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
^AXAF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
^AXAF Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^AXAF vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P/ASX All Australian 50 Index (^AXAF) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^AXAFVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.10

1.62

-1.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.22

2.25

-2.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.30

-0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.14

1.43

-1.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.30

4.05

-3.75

^AXAF vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^AXAF Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^AXAF and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^AXAFVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

1.62

-1.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

1.09

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.98

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

1.11

-1.01

Drawdowns

^AXAF vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^AXAF drawdown since its inception was -51.77%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -24.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^AXAF and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^AXAFVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.77%

-24.78%

-26.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.21%

-11.29%

+3.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.96%

-17.50%

+3.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.52%

-21.45%

+6.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.42%

-24.78%

-10.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.68%

-0.24%

-4.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.44%

-3.73%

-12.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.86%

3.99%

-0.13%

Volatility

^AXAF vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

S&P/ASX All Australian 50 Index (^AXAF) has a higher volatility of 4.29% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 1.94%. This indicates that ^AXAF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^AXAFVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.29%

1.94%

+2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.26%

7.52%

+1.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.70%

10.07%

+1.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.50%

14.51%

-2.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.78%

16.29%

-1.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


^AXAF and VOO have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

^AXAF has higher volatility (4.29%) compared to VOO (1.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^AXAF dropped -51.77% vs VOO's -24.78%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^AXAF and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer