PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^AFLI vs. VDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^AFLI vs. VDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in S&P/ASX 50 (^AFLI) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

^AFLI is traded in AUD, while VDC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VDC values have been converted to AUD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^AFLI achieves a 2.34% return, which is significantly higher than VDC's -2.31% return. Over the past 10 years, ^AFLI has underperformed VDC with an annualized return of 4.91%, while VDC has yielded a comparatively higher 7.81% annualized return.


^AFLI

1D
0.43%
1M
0.30%
YTD
2.34%
6M
4.31%
1Y
3.77%
3Y*
7.01%
5Y*
3.82%
10Y*
4.91%

VDC

1D
0.00%
1M
-4.08%
YTD
-2.31%
6M
-4.68%
1Y
-9.39%
3Y*
4.27%
5Y*
7.54%
10Y*
7.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^AFLI vs. VDC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^AFLI
S&P/ASX 50
2.34%3.98%7.44%8.52%-3.01%12.37%-4.86%19.07%-5.89%4.57%
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
-2.31%-5.25%24.70%2.46%4.70%24.54%1.12%26.69%2.09%3.33%

Correlation

The correlation between ^AFLI and VDC is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2013

-0.02

The correlation between ^AFLI and VDC shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to -0.01 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^AFLI vs. VDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^AFLI
^AFLI Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
^AFLI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^AFLI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
^AFLI Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
^AFLI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
^AFLI Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

VDC
VDC Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
VDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDC Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
VDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDC Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^AFLI vs. VDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P/ASX 50 (^AFLI) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^AFLIVDCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.26

-0.67

+0.93

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.46

-0.89

+1.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

0.91

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.28

-0.88

+1.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.60

-1.62

+2.21

^AFLI vs. VDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^AFLI Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is higher than the VDC Sharpe Ratio of -0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^AFLI and VDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^AFLIVDCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

-0.67

+0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.55

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.52

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.68

-0.43

Drawdowns

^AFLI vs. VDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^AFLI drawdown since its inception was -35.46%, which is greater than VDC's maximum drawdown of -21.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^AFLI and VDC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^AFLIVDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.46%

-21.35%

-14.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.06%

-10.71%

+2.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.79%

-12.69%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.59%

-12.89%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.46%

-15.88%

-19.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.26%

-12.69%

+8.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.04%

-5.68%

-0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.81%

5.88%

-2.07%

Volatility

^AFLI vs. VDC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for S&P/ASX 50 (^AFLI) is 4.37%, while Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) has a volatility of 4.94%. This indicates that ^AFLI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^AFLIVDCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

4.94%

-0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.39%

11.30%

-1.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.80%

14.18%

-2.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.54%

13.72%

-1.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.81%

14.93%

-0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


^AFLI and VDC have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VDC has higher volatility (4.94%) compared to ^AFLI (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^AFLI dropped -35.46% vs VDC's -21.35%.

^AFLI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^AFLI and VDC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer