PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^AEX vs. ^GDAXI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^AEX vs. ^GDAXI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in AEX Index (^AEX) and DAX Performance Index (^GDAXI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

^AEX vs. ^GDAXI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^AEX
AEX Index
2.67%8.27%11.67%14.20%-13.65%27.75%3.31%23.92%-10.41%12.71%
^GDAXI
DAX Performance Index
-4.87%23.01%18.85%20.31%-12.35%15.79%3.55%25.48%-18.26%12.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^AEX achieves a 2.67% return, which is significantly higher than ^GDAXI's -4.87% return. Over the past 10 years, ^AEX has underperformed ^GDAXI with an annualized return of 8.44%, while ^GDAXI has yielded a comparatively higher 9.05% annualized return.


^AEX

1D
1.76%
1M
-3.88%
YTD
2.67%
6M
3.01%
1Y
7.90%
3Y*
8.91%
5Y*
6.63%
10Y*
8.44%

^GDAXI

1D
2.73%
1M
-5.44%
YTD
-4.87%
6M
-3.38%
1Y
3.37%
3Y*
14.24%
5Y*
9.05%
10Y*
9.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^AEX vs. ^GDAXI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^AEX
^AEX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
^AEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^AEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
^AEX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
^AEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
^AEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

^GDAXI
^GDAXI Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
^GDAXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GDAXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GDAXI Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
^GDAXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GDAXI Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^AEX vs. ^GDAXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AEX Index (^AEX) and DAX Performance Index (^GDAXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^AEX^GDAXIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.50

0.19

+0.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.76

0.38

+0.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.05

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

0.33

+2.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.66

1.12

+4.54

^AEX vs. ^GDAXI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^AEX Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is higher than the ^GDAXI Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^AEX and ^GDAXI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^AEX^GDAXIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

0.19

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.53

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.49

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.41

-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between ^AEX and ^GDAXI is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Drawdowns

^AEX vs. ^GDAXI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^AEX drawdown since its inception was -71.60%, roughly equal to the maximum ^GDAXI drawdown of -72.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^AEX and ^GDAXI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


^AEX^GDAXIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.60%

-72.68%

+1.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.65%

-12.27%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.80%

-26.40%

+2.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.78%

-38.78%

+3.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.18%

-8.35%

+3.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.69%

-14.75%

-7.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

3.62%

-0.78%

Volatility

^AEX vs. ^GDAXI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AEX Index (^AEX) is 5.17%, while DAX Performance Index (^GDAXI) has a volatility of 6.90%. This indicates that ^AEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GDAXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


^AEX^GDAXIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.17%

6.90%

-1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.00%

11.31%

-1.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.47%

17.71%

-2.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.39%

16.80%

-1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.22%

18.30%

-2.08%