Asset Allocation
| Position | Category/Sector | Target Weight |
|---|---|---|
MXWO.L Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF | Global Equities | 89.70% |
MXFS.L Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc | Emerging Markets Equities | 10.30% |
Find the right asset allocation for global world
Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio OptimizerPerformance
Performance Chart
The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in global world, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
As of Jun 17, 2026, the global world returned 11.63% Year-To-Date and 13.23% of annualized return in the last 10 years.
| Position | 1D | 1M | YTD | 6M | 1Y | 3Y* | 5Y* | 10Y* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark S&P 500 Index | -0.57% | 1.39% | 9.73% | 10.46% | 24.50% | 19.43% | 12.21% | 13.75% |
Portfolio global world | -0.27% | 2.73% | 11.63% | 13.68% | 27.27% | 19.90% | 11.52% | 13.23% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||
MXFS.L Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc | -1.13% | 6.12% | 26.68% | 31.59% | 49.03% | 22.30% | 7.67% | 10.39% |
MXWO.L Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF | -0.16% | 2.32% | 9.96% | 11.72% | 24.91% | 19.56% | 11.89% | 13.50% |
Monthly Returns
Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Apr 27, 2010, global world's average daily return is +0.04%, while the average monthly return is +0.90%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 6.4 years.
Historically, 65% of months were positive and 35% were negative. The best month was Nov 2020 with a return of +12.0%, while the worst month was Mar 2020 at -11.1%. The longest winning streak lasted 15 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 5 months.
On a daily basis, global world closed higher 54% of trading days. The best single day was Mar 24, 2020 with a return of +8.6%, while the worst single day was Mar 12, 2020 at -10.5%.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.33% | 1.30% | -7.79% | 10.79% | 5.38% | 0.04% | 11.63% | ||||||
| 2025 | 3.61% | -2.31% | -3.83% | 0.83% | 6.41% | 4.56% | 1.94% | 1.95% | 3.20% | 2.66% | 0.02% | 1.54% | 22.14% |
| 2024 | 0.77% | 3.35% | 3.55% | -2.70% | 2.59% | 3.65% | 1.19% | 1.70% | 2.68% | -1.76% | 3.86% | -1.94% | 17.98% |
| 2023 | 6.75% | -2.17% | 2.58% | 1.49% | -1.20% | 6.29% | 3.66% | -2.75% | -3.83% | -3.70% | 9.14% | 5.59% | 22.86% |
| 2022 | -5.82% | -1.45% | 2.85% | -7.50% | -1.50% | -8.19% | 6.45% | -2.87% | -8.41% | 4.74% | 5.44% | -2.09% | -18.25% |
| 2021 | -0.02% | 2.06% | 2.94% | 4.16% | 1.77% | 1.12% | 1.13% | 2.29% | -3.32% | 4.20% | -1.86% | 3.62% | 19.33% |
Benchmark Metrics
global world has an annualized alpha of 3.57%, beta of 0.58, and R2 of 0.40 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since April 27, 2010.
- This portfolio participated in 97.22% of S&P 500 Index downside but only 91.52% of its upside - more exposed to losses than it benefited from rallies.
- Beta of 0.58 may look defensive, but with R2 of 0.40 this portfolio is largely uncorrelated with S&P 500 Index - low beta reflects independence, not downside protection. See the Volatility section for a true picture of this portfolio's risk.
- R2 of 0.40 means the benchmark explains less than half of this portfolio's behavior - treat beta with caution or consider switching to a more representative benchmark.
- Alpha
- 3.57%
- Beta
- 0.58
- R²
- 0.40
- Upside Capture
- 91.52%
- Downside Capture
- 97.22%
Expense Ratio
global world has an expense ratio of 0.19%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.
Return for Risk
Risk / Return Rank
global world ranks 49 for risk / return — on par with similar Portfolios. You're getting a typical balance of risk and reward. Not a standout, but not a red flag either — a reasonable choice if other factors align with your goals.
Return / Risk — by metrics
The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for global world and compares them with S&P 500 Index.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| Portfolio | Benchmark | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.12 | 1.98 | +0.14 |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.16 | 2.70 | +0.46 |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.36 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.11 | 2.71 | +0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.73 | 12.15 | +0.57 |
How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.
| Position | Risk / Return Rank | Sharpe ratio | Sortino ratio | Omega ratio | Calmar ratio | Martin ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXFS.L Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc | 78 | 2.36 | 3.17 | 1.43 | 3.82 | 13.42 |
MXWO.L Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF | 67 | 2.02 | 3.04 | 1.37 | 2.98 | 12.43 |
Loading charts...
Dividends
Dividend yield
Drawdowns
Drawdowns Chart
The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.
Loading charts...
Worst Drawdowns
The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the global world. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.
The maximum drawdown for the global world was 33.67%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 106 trading sessions.
The current global world drawdown is 0.68%.
Related event | Drawdown | Fall | Recovery | Underwater |
|---|---|---|---|---|
COVID crash2020 | -33.67%Mar 2020 | 1mo 4d | 5mo 4d | 6mo 8dFeb 2020 - Aug 2020 |
Bear market2022 | -26.02%Oct 2022 | 9mo 15d | 1y 3mo | 2y 24dDec 2021 - Jan 2024 |
2011 bear market2011 | -23.98%Oct 2011 | 5mo 4d | 1y 3mo | 1y 8moMay 2011 - Jan 2013 |
2016 bear market2016 | -20.12%Feb 2016 | 8mo 25d | 11mo 7d | 1y 7moMay 2015 - Jan 2017 |
Rate-hike selloffLate 2018 | -18.01%Dec 2018 | 10mo 29d | 6mo 11d | 1y 5moJan 2018 - Jul 2019 |
Volatility
Volatility Chart
The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Diversification
Diversification Metrics
Number of Effective Assets
The portfolio contains 2 assets, with an effective number of assets of 1.23, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your allocation shows noticeable concentration: a few holdings carry significantly more weight than the rest. Rebalancing toward more even weights — or adding less correlated assets — could reduce risk.
Diversification Ratio
1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | All Time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Diversification Ratio | 1.03 | 1.03 | 1.03 | 1.03 | 1.03 |
The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.03, placing it in the bottom quartile across portfolios — positions are highly correlated. Consider adding assets from different classes or sectors to reduce risk.
global world correlation to the S&P 500 Index
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2010 | 0.61 |
Benchmark Correlations
Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. MXWO.L has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.61, while MXFS.L has the lowest at 0.50.
Asset Correlations Table
Find what global world is missing
See which holdings overlap, where global world is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.
Analyze Diversification