PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
test2
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


BND 25.00%BIZD 25.00%MAIN 25.00%O 25.00%BondBondEquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in test2, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Feb 12, 2013, corresponding to the inception date of BIZD

Returns By Period

As of Apr 2, 2026, the test2 returned -2.13% Year-To-Date and 8.18% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.11%-3.43%-3.84%-1.98%16.08%16.86%10.37%12.29%
Portfolio
test2
1.07%-3.86%-2.13%-4.07%0.71%9.41%6.81%8.18%
BIZD
VanEck Vectors BDC Income ETF
2.15%-0.82%-9.35%-9.08%-15.03%6.54%5.67%7.92%
MAIN
Main Street Capital Corporation
1.39%-7.08%-11.22%-14.68%-1.57%19.10%14.06%13.84%
O
Realty Income Corporation
0.53%-6.12%11.80%6.39%15.07%5.34%4.90%5.14%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
0.22%-0.98%0.31%0.85%4.27%3.53%0.30%1.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Feb 13, 2013, test2's average daily return is +0.03%, while the average monthly return is +0.73%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 7.9 years.

Historically, 64% of months were positive and 36% were negative. The best month was Apr 2020 with a return of +15.4%, while the worst month was Mar 2020 at -27.8%. The longest winning streak lasted 7 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 3 months.

On a daily basis, test2 closed higher 55% of trading days. The best single day was Mar 24, 2020 with a return of +8.9%, while the worst single day was Mar 18, 2020 at -13.5%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20263.50%-1.98%-3.95%0.43%-2.13%
20253.74%1.42%-2.11%-2.72%2.43%2.40%2.41%2.17%-1.40%-3.68%1.23%0.59%6.33%
20240.46%-0.83%3.43%0.93%1.00%0.98%3.38%1.60%1.79%-1.17%3.07%-0.04%15.47%
20236.63%0.43%-2.37%1.16%-1.69%1.87%3.53%-3.11%-2.06%-4.09%8.63%5.17%14.03%
2022-0.86%-1.60%0.64%-3.31%-2.13%-1.51%9.26%-4.36%-13.15%7.16%3.62%-2.09%-9.73%
2021-0.91%6.89%4.28%6.37%-0.47%-0.11%2.01%1.45%-3.02%5.46%-0.38%2.31%26.03%

Benchmark Metrics

test2 has an annualized alpha of 1.74%, beta of 0.56, and R² of 0.41 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since February 13, 2013.

  • This portfolio participated in 65.32% of S&P 500 Index downside but only 59.68% of its upside — more exposed to losses than it benefited from rallies.
  • Beta of 0.56 may look defensive, but with R² of 0.41 this portfolio is largely uncorrelated with S&P 500 Index — low beta reflects independence, not downside protection. See the Volatility section for a true picture of this portfolio's risk.
  • R² of 0.41 means the benchmark explains less than half of this portfolio's behavior — treat beta with caution or consider switching to a more representative benchmark.

Alpha
1.74%
Beta
0.56
0.41
Upside Capture
59.68%
Downside Capture
65.32%

Expense Ratio

test2 has a high expense ratio of 2.74%, indicating above-average management fees. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

test2 ranks 4 for risk / return — in the bottom 4% of portfolios on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.


test2 Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
test2 Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
test2 Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
test2 Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
test2 Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
test2 Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.05

0.88

-0.83

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.17

1.37

-1.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.21

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.05

1.39

-1.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.12

6.43

-6.32


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
BIZD
VanEck Vectors BDC Income ETF
2-0.71-0.880.89-0.70-1.40
MAIN
Main Street Capital Corporation
34-0.060.091.01-0.10-0.23
O
Realty Income Corporation
660.901.291.161.354.03
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
481.001.421.181.714.64

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

test2 Sharpe ratios as of Apr 2, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 0.05
  • 5-Year: 0.56
  • 10-Year: 0.51
  • All Time: 0.54

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.00 to 1.69, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio places it in the bottom 25%. This suggests weaker risk-adjusted returns than most portfolios, possibly due to lower returns, higher volatility, or both. It may be worth reviewing the allocation. You can use the Portfolio Optimization tool to explore options for improving the Sharpe ratio.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of test2 compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

test2 provided a 7.79% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio7.79%7.21%6.75%6.98%6.61%4.97%6.07%5.58%6.58%5.90%5.66%6.31%
BIZD
VanEck Vectors BDC Income ETF
13.93%11.78%10.94%10.96%11.21%8.14%10.39%9.13%10.88%9.13%8.51%9.12%
MAIN
Main Street Capital Corporation
8.09%7.00%7.02%8.55%7.97%5.74%6.99%6.76%8.43%7.49%7.42%9.15%
O
Realty Income Corporation
5.20%6.19%5.37%5.33%4.68%3.87%4.51%3.69%4.19%4.45%4.18%4.41%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
3.92%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the test2. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the test2 was 42.33%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 245 trading sessions.

The current test2 drawdown is 7.58%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-42.33%Feb 21, 202022Mar 23, 2020245Mar 12, 2021267
-18.36%Jan 13, 2022186Oct 10, 2022296Dec 13, 2023482
-13.38%May 22, 201323Jun 24, 2013164Feb 18, 2014187
-11.76%Feb 24, 202532Apr 8, 202558Jul 2, 202590
-8.85%Sep 12, 2025136Mar 27, 2026

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 4 assets, with an effective number of assets of 4.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkBNDOMAINBIZDPortfolio
Benchmark1.00-0.020.340.510.570.56
BND-0.021.000.25-0.00-0.010.21
O0.340.251.000.290.290.71
MAIN0.51-0.000.291.000.740.81
BIZD0.57-0.010.290.741.000.78
Portfolio0.560.210.710.810.781.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Feb 13, 2013