PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
New thought 2.75
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


S&P 500 Index

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right asset allocation for New thought 2.75

Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in New thought 2.75, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every year.


Loading charts...

Returns By Period


Position1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.30%0.09%8.18%8.17%23.42%19.88%11.91%13.45%
Portfolio
New thought 2.75
-0.38%0.85%4.83%6.41%10.98%13.88%8.97%
ICSU.L
iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-0.06%-2.64%7.60%8.54%4.83%8.88%7.22%
MVUS.L
iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-0.39%2.24%3.12%4.80%10.22%13.40%8.71%10.45%
XDWI.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C
-0.66%-1.57%10.03%11.71%20.33%20.58%11.29%12.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Mar 23, 2017, New thought 2.75's average daily return is +0.04%, while the average monthly return is +0.85%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 6.8 years.

Historically, 70% of months were positive and 30% were negative. The best month was Apr 2020 with a return of +8.7%, while the worst month was Mar 2020 at -10.3%. The longest winning streak lasted 10 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 3 months.

On a daily basis, New thought 2.75 closed higher 55% of trading days. The best single day was Nov 16, 2023 with a return of +20.4%, while the worst single day was Nov 17, 2023 at -16.7%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20261.63%3.32%-7.00%5.69%1.90%-0.34%4.83%
20253.22%0.58%-1.63%-0.63%3.82%2.01%0.31%0.68%1.26%0.25%1.14%1.09%12.66%
20242.58%2.87%3.31%-2.97%2.71%2.46%2.08%2.75%1.97%-0.78%4.10%-4.69%17.20%
20231.59%-3.20%3.02%2.78%-3.25%4.85%1.43%-1.62%-4.25%-2.41%7.28%3.97%9.87%
2022-5.77%-1.39%4.73%-3.50%-2.93%-5.15%5.42%-2.41%-7.02%6.55%4.01%-1.43%-9.64%
2021-1.71%0.25%6.32%3.54%1.35%0.61%2.74%1.78%-4.08%4.47%0.28%5.82%23.01%

Benchmark Metrics

New thought 2.75 has an annualized alpha of 5.77%, beta of 0.41, and R2 of 0.22 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since March 23, 2017.

  • This portfolio participated in 75.40% of S&P 500 Index downside but only 71.64% of its upside - more exposed to losses than it benefited from rallies.
  • Beta of 0.41 may look defensive, but with R2 of 0.22 this portfolio is largely uncorrelated with S&P 500 Index - low beta reflects independence, not downside protection. See the Volatility section for a true picture of this portfolio's risk.
  • R2 of 0.22 means this portfolio moves largely independently of S&P 500 Index - capture ratios reflect limited market correlation rather than active downside protection. Consider using a more representative benchmark.

Alpha
5.77%
Beta
0.41
0.22
Upside Capture
71.64%
Downside Capture
75.40%

Expense Ratio

New thought 2.75 has an expense ratio of 0.20%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

New thought 2.75 ranks 18 for risk / return — in the bottom 18% of Portfolios on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.


New thought 2.75 Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
New thought 2.75 Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
New thought 2.75 Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
New thought 2.75 Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
New thought 2.75 Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
New thought 2.75 Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics

The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for New thought 2.75 and compares them with S&P 500 Index.


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

1.33

1.94

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

1.98

2.63

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.35

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

2.59

-1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.62

11.84

-6.22


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

PositionRisk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
ICSU.L
iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
150.340.591.070.511.07
MVUS.L
iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
381.241.821.211.556.27
XDWI.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C
421.282.011.241.796.81

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

New thought 2.75 Sharpe ratios as of Jun 9, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 1.33
  • 5-Year: 0.53
  • All Time: 0.62

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.62 to 2.49, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio places it in the bottom 25%. This suggests weaker risk-adjusted returns than most portfolios, possibly due to lower returns, higher volatility, or both. It may be worth reviewing the allocation. You can use the Portfolio Optimization tool to explore options for improving the Sharpe ratio.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of New thought 2.75 compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading charts...

Dividends

Dividend yield


New thought 2.75 doesn't pay dividends

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading charts...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the New thought 2.75. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the New thought 2.75 was 32.41%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 140 trading sessions.

The current New thought 2.75 drawdown is 0.74%.


Related event

Drawdown

Fall

Recovery

Underwater

COVID crash2020
-32.41%Mar 2020
1mo 4d6mo 23d
7mo 27dFeb 2020 - Oct 2020
Bear market2022
-19.08%Oct 2022
9mo 14d1y 1mo
1y 10moDec 2021 - Nov 2023
2023 correction2023
-16.67%Nov 2023
0s9mo 2d
9mo 2dNov 2023 - Aug 2024
Rate-hike selloffLate 2018
-15.13%Dec 2018
3mo 1d3mo 9d
6mo 10dSep 2018 - Apr 2019
2025 selloff2025
-11.85%Apr 2025
1mo 4d1mo 12d
2mo 16dMar 2025 - May 2025

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 3 assets, with an effective number of assets of 1.87, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your allocation shows noticeable concentration: a few holdings carry significantly more weight than the rest. Rebalancing toward more even weights — or adding less correlated assets — could reduce risk.


Diversification Ratio
1Y
3Y
5Y
All Time
Diversification Ratio

1.25

1.10

1.10

1.09

The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.09, placing it in the bottom quartile across portfolios — positions are highly correlated. Consider adding assets from different classes or sectors to reduce risk.

New thought 2.75 correlation to the S&P 500 Index

New thought 2.75 has a 0.49 correlation to S&P 500 Index over the trailing 12 months. This section compares each holding's correlation to the benchmark and to the portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2017

0.55


Benchmark Correlations

Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. MVUS.L has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.55, while ICSU.L has the lowest at 0.26.

ICSU.L
0.26
XDWI.L
0.51
MVUS.L
0.55

Portfolio Correlations

Correlation vs. New thought 2.75. MVUS.L has the highest portfolio correlation at 0.98, while ICSU.L has the lowest at 0.70.

ICSU.L
0.70
XDWI.L
0.73
MVUS.L
0.98

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

ICSU.LXDWI.LMVUS.L
ICSU.L1.000.310.65
XDWI.L0.311.000.65
MVUS.L0.650.651.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Mar 23, 2017
Diversification Analysis

Find what New thought 2.75 is missing

See which holdings overlap, where New thought 2.75 is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.

Analyze Diversification