PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
Long-Term Bond 1
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


IGLB 100.00%BondBond

S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Long-Term Bond 1, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Dec 9, 2009, corresponding to the inception date of IGLB

Returns By Period

As of Apr 2, 2026, the Long-Term Bond 1 returned -0.00% Year-To-Date and 2.51% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.11%-3.43%-3.84%-1.98%16.08%16.86%10.37%12.29%
Portfolio
Long-Term Bond 1
0.59%-1.76%-0.00%-1.08%3.96%3.31%-1.47%2.51%
IGLB
iShares 10+ Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
0.59%-1.76%-0.00%-1.08%3.96%3.31%-1.47%2.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Dec 10, 2009, Long-Term Bond 1's average daily return is +0.02%, while the average monthly return is +0.40%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 14.5 years.

Historically, 58% of months were positive and 42% were negative. The best month was Nov 2023 with a return of +10.9%, while the worst month was Apr 2022 at -9.7%. The longest winning streak lasted 8 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 5 months.

On a daily basis, Long-Term Bond 1 closed higher 52% of trading days. The best single day was Mar 23, 2020 with a return of +9.9%, while the worst single day was Mar 18, 2020 at -7.9%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20260.46%1.85%-3.01%0.77%0.00%
20250.47%3.63%-1.50%-1.55%-0.05%2.94%-0.16%0.87%3.25%0.20%0.79%-1.44%7.53%
2024-0.47%-2.89%1.98%-4.88%3.14%0.26%3.19%2.29%2.72%-4.30%2.48%-4.44%-1.50%
20237.43%-5.51%4.45%0.77%-2.81%1.62%-0.17%-2.06%-5.37%-4.06%10.89%6.90%11.03%
2022-4.86%-3.30%-3.46%-9.68%1.78%-4.62%5.21%-5.20%-8.35%-2.35%9.95%-2.38%-25.38%
2021-2.71%-3.33%-2.41%1.63%0.59%3.85%2.25%-0.22%-2.52%1.86%0.23%-0.64%-1.68%

Benchmark Metrics

Long-Term Bond 1 has an annualized alpha of 4.02%, beta of 0.08, and R² of 0.01 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since December 10, 2009.

  • This portfolio participated in 33.82% of S&P 500 Index downside but only 28.96% of its upside — more exposed to losses than it benefited from rallies.
  • Beta of 0.08 may look defensive, but with R² of 0.01 this portfolio is largely uncorrelated with S&P 500 Index — low beta reflects independence, not downside protection. See the Volatility section for a true picture of this portfolio's risk.
  • R² of 0.01 means this portfolio moves largely independently of S&P 500 Index — capture ratios reflect limited market correlation rather than active downside protection. Consider using a more representative benchmark.

Alpha
4.02%
Beta
0.08
0.01
Upside Capture
28.96%
Downside Capture
33.82%

Expense Ratio

Long-Term Bond 1 has an expense ratio of 0.06%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

Long-Term Bond 1 ranks 9 for risk / return — in the bottom 9% of portfolios on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.


Long-Term Bond 1 Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
Long-Term Bond 1 Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
Long-Term Bond 1 Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
Long-Term Bond 1 Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
Long-Term Bond 1 Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
Long-Term Bond 1 Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.40

0.88

-0.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.60

1.37

-0.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.21

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.81

1.39

-0.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.91

6.43

-4.53


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
IGLB
iShares 10+ Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
220.400.601.080.811.91

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

Long-Term Bond 1 Sharpe ratios as of Apr 2, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 0.40
  • 5-Year: -0.12
  • 10-Year: 0.20
  • All Time: 0.38

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.01 to 1.70, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio places it in the bottom 25%. This suggests weaker risk-adjusted returns than most portfolios, possibly due to lower returns, higher volatility, or both. It may be worth reviewing the allocation. You can use the Portfolio Optimization tool to explore options for improving the Sharpe ratio.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of Long-Term Bond 1 compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

Long-Term Bond 1 provided a 5.26% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio5.26%5.14%5.10%4.59%4.56%3.16%3.22%3.73%4.56%3.94%4.21%4.58%
IGLB
iShares 10+ Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
5.26%5.14%5.10%4.59%4.56%3.16%3.22%3.73%4.56%3.94%4.21%4.58%

Monthly Dividends

The table below shows the monthly dividends paid by this portfolio.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
2026$0.00$0.22$0.22$0.23$0.67
2025$0.00$0.22$0.22$0.22$0.22$0.22$0.22$0.21$0.21$0.22$0.21$0.43$2.59
2024$0.00$0.21$0.21$0.21$0.21$0.21$0.22$0.20$0.21$0.20$0.22$0.43$2.52
2023$0.00$0.20$0.19$0.20$0.20$0.19$0.19$0.20$0.21$0.21$0.21$0.41$2.42
2022$0.00$0.18$0.19$0.21$0.19$0.18$0.19$0.19$0.19$0.19$0.19$0.37$2.27
2021$0.00$0.18$0.19$0.19$0.19$0.18$0.19$0.18$0.18$0.18$0.18$0.36$2.20

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Long-Term Bond 1. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the Long-Term Bond 1 was 34.12%, occurring on Oct 24, 2022. The portfolio has not yet recovered.

The current Long-Term Bond 1 drawdown is 14.93%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-34.12%Sep 23, 2021274Oct 24, 2022
-27.72%Mar 9, 20209Mar 19, 202077Jul 9, 202086
-14.42%May 3, 201336Jun 24, 2013224May 15, 2014260
-11.2%Feb 2, 2015102Jun 26, 2015239Jun 8, 2016341
-10.23%Aug 7, 2020154Mar 18, 202196Aug 4, 2021250

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 1 assets, with an effective number of assets of 1.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkIGLBPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.020.02
IGLB0.021.001.00
Portfolio0.021.001.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Dec 10, 2009