PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MATANA Portfolio
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


MSFT 16.67%AAPL 16.67%TSLA 16.67%GOOG 16.67%NVDA 16.67%AMZN 16.67%EquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right asset allocation for MATANA Portfolio

Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in MATANA Portfolio, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of Jun 3, 2026, the MATANA Portfolio returned 7.62% Year-To-Date and 40.04% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


Position1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.13%5.25%11.16%11.43%28.20%21.12%12.66%13.75%
Portfolio
MATANA Portfolio
-1.04%4.25%7.62%7.27%43.87%37.11%29.30%40.04%
AAPL
Apple Inc
2.90%12.62%16.16%10.34%56.89%20.88%21.22%30.33%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
-1.81%-4.38%11.13%9.43%24.13%27.33%9.99%21.60%
GOOG
Alphabet Inc
-3.81%-6.48%14.29%13.56%111.09%42.36%24.62%25.90%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-4.17%6.71%-8.34%-9.54%-3.71%10.44%13.35%25.43%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
-0.69%12.28%19.48%22.81%62.23%78.33%67.45%69.46%
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
1.89%8.42%-5.78%-1.28%23.65%25.58%17.28%40.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Apr 4, 2014, MATANA Portfolio's average daily return is +0.14%, while the average monthly return is +2.92%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 2.0 years.

Historically, 63% of months were positive and 37% were negative. The best month was Aug 2020 with a return of +27.4%, while the worst month was Apr 2022 at -18.7%. The longest winning streak lasted 11 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 4 months.

On a daily basis, MATANA Portfolio closed higher 56% of trading days. The best single day was Apr 9, 2025 with a return of +14.6%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -13.9%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
2026-0.96%-6.86%-4.59%15.79%7.15%-1.44%7.62%
2025-0.21%-9.10%-9.60%1.68%12.99%4.76%5.59%3.48%10.45%7.36%-1.65%0.24%26.06%
20240.73%9.42%2.95%-0.53%8.23%9.37%0.41%-2.11%6.11%-0.09%10.04%6.60%63.32%
202320.72%4.70%11.56%-1.02%16.34%9.51%4.20%0.49%-6.66%-3.26%12.21%3.08%94.43%
2022-8.95%-2.48%8.74%-18.73%-4.04%-9.55%19.01%-7.75%-11.21%-0.57%4.10%-14.44%-41.20%
20213.20%-1.74%0.11%10.27%-2.65%10.47%2.48%7.30%-4.92%17.43%7.02%-2.69%53.92%

Benchmark Metrics

MATANA Portfolio has an annualized alpha of 19.97%, beta of 1.34, and R2 of 0.69 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since April 04, 2014.

  • This portfolio captured 207.59% of S&P 500 Index gains but only 98.96% of its losses - a favorable profile for investors.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 19.97% versus S&P 500 Index - delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.

Alpha
19.97%
Beta
1.34
0.69
Upside Capture
207.59%
Downside Capture
98.96%

Expense Ratio

MATANA Portfolio has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


The portfolio doesn't include any funds that charge management fees.

Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

MATANA Portfolio ranks 29 for risk / return — below 29% of Portfolios on our site. The returns aren't fully compensating for the risk involved. This isn't necessarily a dealbreaker, but factor it into your decision — especially if you're risk-averse.


MATANA Portfolio Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
MATANA Portfolio Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MATANA Portfolio Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
MATANA Portfolio Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MATANA Portfolio Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
MATANA Portfolio Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics

The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for MATANA Portfolio and compares them with S&P 500 Index.


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.25

2.39

-0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.94

3.25

-0.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.43

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

3.11

-0.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.25

14.38

-6.13


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

PositionRisk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
AAPL
Apple Inc
902.573.561.464.1710.52
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
630.811.291.161.162.79
GOOG
Alphabet Inc
953.915.281.635.2119.12
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
33-0.15-0.041.00-0.10-0.21
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
821.842.471.303.217.92
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
550.510.981.120.751.74

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

MATANA Portfolio Sharpe ratios as of Jun 3, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 2.25
  • 5-Year: 0.99
  • 10-Year: 1.36
  • All Time: 1.32

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.95 to 2.94, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and return—likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of MATANA Portfolio compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading charts...

Dividends

Dividend yield

MATANA Portfolio provided a 0.23% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio0.23%0.23%0.24%0.21%0.31%0.20%0.28%0.42%0.66%0.60%0.79%0.91%
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.33%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GOOG
Alphabet Inc
0.23%0.26%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.81%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading charts...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the MATANA Portfolio. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the MATANA Portfolio was 46.26%, occurring on Jan 5, 2023. Recovery took 113 trading sessions.

The current MATANA Portfolio drawdown is 2.15%.


Related event

Drawdown

Fall

Recovery

Underwater

2023 bear market2023
-46.26%Jan 2023
1y 1mo5mo 16d
1y 7moNov 2021 - Jun 2023
COVID crash2020
-35.31%Mar 2020
27d2mo 15d
3mo 12dFeb 2020 - Jun 2020
2025 selloff2025
-31.88%Apr 2025
3mo 21d4mo 2d
7mo 23dDec 2024 - Aug 2025
Rate-hike selloffLate 2018
-27.94%Dec 2018
2mo 23d10mo 4d
1y 22dOct 2018 - Oct 2019
2016 bear market2016
-21.66%Feb 2016
1mo 12d1mo 26d
3mo 8dDec 2015 - Apr 2016

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Diversification

AI Analysis


Thesis

The portfolio is a six-stock megacap growth basket, with Microsoft (MSFT), Apple (AAPL), Tesla (TSLA), Alphabet (GOOG), NVIDIA (NVDA), and Amazon (AMZN) each at 16.67%. It is, in some sense, a bet on the same broad market regime wearing different ticker symbols.

The numbers

  • Effective asset count is 6.0 of 6, so the weights are evenly spread; concentration is not the issue.
  • Diversification ratio is 1.58 at 1Y, versus 1.31 at inception and 1.29-1.38 over longer windows, placing the portfolio around the 55th-72nd percentile on the platform.
  • Pairwise correlations average 0.51, with a tight cluster around Microsoft (MSFT), Alphabet (GOOG), Amazon (AMZN), and Apple (AAPL).

What works

  • The portfolio does have real name-level spread: Tesla (TSLA) is the clear odd stock out, and NVIDIA (NVDA) is not just a clone of the software megacaps.
  • The 1Y diversification ratio is better than the long-run readings, which means recent co-movement has not been especially punishing.

What does not

  • Four of the six holdings sit in a single moving cluster, so the portfolio’s internal economy is closer to one factor than six.
  • Position-to-portfolio correlations of 0.70-0.76 say each sleeve is doing a lot of the same work.

Stress Scenario

  • A broad drawdown in U.S. mega-cap growth, especially one driven by higher discount rates or weaker cloud/AI spending, would likely compress the whole cluster at once.
  • Tesla (TSLA) offers some separation, but not enough to prevent the portfolio from behaving like one equity bet when correlations rise.

Worth knowing

  • Portfolios with this correlation profile are often diversified more by earnings-driver heterogeneity than by ticker count.
  • The data fits a portfolio that is diversified at the position level, but only moderately diversified at the risk-factor level.
AI-generated analysis. Not investment advice. Verify key facts independently.
Was this useful?

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 6 assets, with an effective number of assets of 6.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is spread almost evenly across your holdings, indicating a well-balanced allocation. Note that true diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.


Diversification Ratio
1Y
3Y
5Y
10Y
All Time
Diversification Ratio

1.58

1.38

1.30

1.29

1.31

The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.31, in line with the typical range across portfolios. There's room to improve by adding less correlated assets.

MATANA Portfolio correlation to the S&P 500 Index

MATANA Portfolio has a 0.82 correlation to S&P 500 Index over the trailing 12 months. This section compares each holding's correlation to the benchmark and to the portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2014

0.78


Benchmark Correlations

Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. MSFT has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.72, while TSLA has the lowest at 0.47.

TSLA
0.47
NVDA
0.62
AMZN
0.64
AAPL
0.67
GOOG
0.69
MSFT
0.72

Portfolio Correlations

Correlation vs. MATANA Portfolio. NVDA has the highest portfolio correlation at 0.76, while AAPL has the lowest at 0.70.

AAPL
0.70
TSLA
0.72
GOOG
0.74
MSFT
0.75
AMZN
0.76
NVDA
0.76

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Apr 4, 2014
Diversification Analysis

Find what MATANA Portfolio is missing

See which holdings overlap, where MATANA Portfolio is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.

Analyze Diversification