Asset Allocation
| Position | Category/Sector | Target Weight |
|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | Technology | 16.67% |
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | Consumer Cyclical | 16.67% |
GOOG Alphabet Inc | Communication Services | 16.67% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | Technology | 16.67% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | Technology | 16.67% |
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | Consumer Cyclical | 16.67% |
Performance
Performance Chart
The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in MATANA Portfolio, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.
Loading graphics...
The earliest data available for this chart is Apr 3, 2014, corresponding to the inception date of GOOG
Returns By Period
As of Apr 11, 2026, the MATANA Portfolio returned -7.68% Year-To-Date and 38.34% of annualized return in the last 10 years.
| 1D | 1M | YTD | 6M | 1Y | 3Y* | 5Y* | 10Y* | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark S&P 500 Index | -0.11% | 2.78% | -0.42% | 4.03% | 27.10% | 18.38% | 10.55% | 12.70% |
Portfolio MATANA Portfolio | 0.81% | 1.85% | -7.68% | 0.72% | 44.01% | 39.28% | 25.07% | 38.34% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | -0.59% | -6.24% | -23.14% | -27.12% | -3.79% | 10.31% | 8.60% | 22.66% |
AAPL Apple Inc | -0.00% | 4.14% | -4.10% | 6.40% | 32.03% | 18.01% | 14.99% | 26.40% |
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | 0.96% | -10.80% | -22.41% | -15.61% | 38.30% | 23.16% | 9.11% | 35.67% |
GOOG Alphabet Inc | -0.21% | 4.73% | 0.68% | 33.12% | 98.75% | 44.22% | 22.73% | 23.96% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 2.57% | 4.65% | 1.15% | 3.00% | 70.08% | 90.83% | 67.37% | 71.10% |
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 2.02% | 14.79% | 3.28% | 10.17% | 28.94% | 33.62% | 7.17% | 22.97% |
Monthly Returns
Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Apr 4, 2014, MATANA Portfolio's average daily return is +0.14%, while the average monthly return is +2.85%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 2.1 years.
Historically, 63% of months were positive and 37% were negative. The best month was Aug 2020 with a return of +27.4%, while the worst month was Apr 2022 at -18.7%. The longest winning streak lasted 11 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 4 months.
On a daily basis, MATANA Portfolio closed higher 56% of trading days. The best single day was Apr 9, 2025 with a return of +14.6%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -13.9%.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -0.96% | -6.86% | -4.59% | 4.91% | -7.68% | ||||||||
| 2025 | -0.21% | -9.10% | -9.60% | 1.68% | 12.99% | 4.76% | 5.59% | 3.48% | 10.45% | 7.36% | -1.65% | 0.24% | 26.06% |
| 2024 | 0.73% | 9.42% | 2.95% | -0.53% | 8.23% | 9.37% | 0.41% | -2.11% | 6.11% | -0.09% | 10.04% | 6.60% | 63.32% |
| 2023 | 20.72% | 4.70% | 11.56% | -1.02% | 16.34% | 9.51% | 4.20% | 0.49% | -6.66% | -3.26% | 12.21% | 3.08% | 94.43% |
| 2022 | -8.95% | -2.48% | 8.74% | -18.73% | -4.04% | -9.55% | 19.01% | -7.75% | -11.21% | -0.57% | 4.10% | -14.44% | -41.20% |
| 2021 | 3.20% | -1.74% | 0.11% | 10.27% | -2.65% | 10.47% | 2.48% | 7.30% | -4.92% | 17.43% | 7.02% | -2.69% | 53.92% |
Benchmark Metrics
MATANA Portfolio has an annualized alpha of 20.16%, beta of 1.34, and R² of 0.69 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since April 04, 2014.
- This portfolio captured 209.22% of S&P 500 Index gains but only 98.96% of its losses — a favorable profile for investors.
- This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 20.16% versus S&P 500 Index — delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.
- Alpha
- 20.16%
- Beta
- 1.34
- R²
- 0.69
- Upside Capture
- 209.22%
- Downside Capture
- 98.96%
Expense Ratio
MATANA Portfolio has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.
Return for Risk
Risk / Return Rank
MATANA Portfolio ranks 34 for risk / return — below 34% of portfolios on our site. The returns aren't fully compensating for the risk involved. This isn't necessarily a dealbreaker, but factor it into your decision — especially if you're risk-averse.
Return / Risk — by metrics
| Portfolio | Benchmark | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.18 | 2.23 | -0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.92 | 3.12 | -0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.42 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 4.05 | -0.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.32 | 17.91 | -6.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.
| Risk / Return Rank | Sharpe ratio | Sortino ratio | Omega ratio | Calmar ratio | Martin ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 29 | -0.08 | 0.05 | 1.01 | 0.16 | 0.40 |
AAPL Apple Inc | 75 | 1.57 | 2.32 | 1.30 | 3.75 | 9.07 |
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | 57 | 0.80 | 1.34 | 1.16 | 1.91 | 4.84 |
GOOG Alphabet Inc | 93 | 3.75 | 4.65 | 1.59 | 5.60 | 20.65 |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 81 | 2.19 | 2.75 | 1.34 | 4.75 | 11.78 |
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 60 | 1.01 | 1.59 | 1.20 | 1.83 | 4.36 |
Loading graphics...
Dividends
Dividend yield
MATANA Portfolio provided a 0.27% dividend yield over the last twelve months.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portfolio | 0.27% | 0.23% | 0.24% | 0.21% | 0.31% | 0.20% | 0.28% | 0.42% | 0.66% | 0.60% | 0.79% | 0.91% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||||||
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.94% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.40% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GOOG Alphabet Inc | 0.27% | 0.26% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
Drawdowns Chart
The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.
Loading graphics...
Worst Drawdowns
The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the MATANA Portfolio. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.
The maximum drawdown for the MATANA Portfolio was 46.26%, occurring on Jan 5, 2023. Recovery took 113 trading sessions.
The current MATANA Portfolio drawdown is 10.33%.
Depth | Start | To Bottom | Bottom | To Recover | End | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -46.26% | Nov 22, 2021 | 282 | Jan 5, 2023 | 113 | Jun 20, 2023 | 395 |
| -35.31% | Feb 20, 2020 | 20 | Mar 18, 2020 | 51 | Jun 1, 2020 | 71 |
| -31.88% | Dec 18, 2024 | 75 | Apr 8, 2025 | 84 | Aug 8, 2025 | 159 |
| -27.94% | Oct 2, 2018 | 58 | Dec 24, 2018 | 210 | Oct 24, 2019 | 268 |
| -21.66% | Dec 30, 2015 | 29 | Feb 10, 2016 | 38 | Apr 6, 2016 | 67 |
Volatility
Volatility Chart
The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Diversification
Diversification Metrics
Number of Effective Assets
The portfolio contains 6 assets, with an effective number of assets of 6.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets indicates a moderate level of diversification, where some assets may have a more significant influence on overall performance.
Asset Correlations Table
| Benchmark | TSLA | NVDA | AAPL | AMZN | GOOG | MSFT | Portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | 1.00 | 0.47 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.78 |
| TSLA | 0.47 | 1.00 | 0.41 | 0.40 | 0.41 | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.72 |
| NVDA | 0.63 | 0.41 | 1.00 | 0.49 | 0.53 | 0.50 | 0.58 | 0.76 |
| AAPL | 0.67 | 0.40 | 0.49 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 0.55 | 0.58 | 0.70 |
| AMZN | 0.64 | 0.41 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.76 |
| GOOG | 0.69 | 0.38 | 0.50 | 0.55 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.74 |
| MSFT | 0.73 | 0.38 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.63 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.75 |
| Portfolio | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 1.00 |
AI Insight on Diversification
The portfolio is moderately diversified but leans toward concentration within a group of highly correlated technology stocks. The correlation matrix reveals that all individual positions—TSLA, AAPL, NVDA, GOOG, AMZN, and MSFT—exhibit moderate to high positive correlations with each other, generally ranging from about 0.38 to 0.66. This clustering of correlations above 0.4 indicates that these stocks tend to move in the same direction, which limits diversification benefits.
Among the individual stocks, the highest correlations appear between GOOG, MSFT, AMZN, and NVDA, with correlations often above 0.5 and as high as 0.66 (GOOG-AMZN). These strong interrelationships suggest that these positions are likely to respond similarly to market events, reducing the risk mitigation that diversification typically provides.
TSLA stands out as having the lowest correlations with the other stocks, mostly around 0.38 to 0.41. While these correlations are still positive, TSLA contributes somewhat to diversification by not moving as tightly in sync with the other positions.
The portfolio’s correlation with individual positions is quite high, ranging from 0.7 to 0.76. This indicates that no single stock overwhelmingly dominates the portfolio’s behavior, but rather the portfolio’s performance is strongly influenced by the collective movement of all these correlated tech stocks. The relatively narrow range of portfolio-to-position correlations suggests a balanced weighting among the holdings rather than a concentration in one or two names.
Overall, the portfolio is not highly diversified across different sectors or uncorrelated assets but is concentrated within a tech-heavy group with moderate to high internal correlations. While TSLA provides some diversification relief, the portfolio remains exposed to sector-specific risks and market factors affecting large-cap technology companies.