Asset Allocation
| Position | Category/Sector | Target Weight |
|---|---|---|
BA.L BAE Systems plc | Industrials | 16.67% |
GD General Dynamics Corporation | 16.67% | |
LHX L3Harris Technologies, Inc. | Industrials | 16.67% |
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | Industrials | 16.67% |
RTX Raytheon Technologies Corporation | Industrials | 16.67% |
TDG TransDigm Group Incorporated | Industrials | 16.67% |
Performance
Performance Chart
The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Aerospace Comparison, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.
Loading graphics...
The earliest data available for this chart is Mar 15, 2006, corresponding to the inception date of TDG
Returns By Period
As of Apr 2, 2026, the Aerospace Comparison returned 13.41% Year-To-Date and 18.96% of annualized return in the last 10 years.
| 1D | 1M | YTD | 6M | 1Y | 3Y* | 5Y* | 10Y* | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark S&P 500 Index | 0.11% | -3.43% | -3.84% | -1.98% | 16.08% | 16.86% | 10.37% | 12.29% |
Portfolio Aerospace Comparison | 0.08% | -4.68% | 13.41% | 12.35% | 38.24% | 25.06% | 21.93% | 18.96% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||
BA.L BAE Systems plc | -0.74% | 2.18% | 31.35% | 10.23% | 51.28% | 38.26% | 37.82% | 19.65% |
RTX Raytheon Technologies Corporation | 0.77% | -4.99% | 7.34% | 18.61% | 49.85% | 27.70% | 23.21% | 16.59% |
LHX L3Harris Technologies, Inc. | 0.59% | -2.92% | 21.69% | 21.15% | 70.88% | 23.93% | 14.08% | 18.78% |
GD General Dynamics Corporation | -0.41% | -4.28% | 4.12% | 3.23% | 28.90% | 16.94% | 16.57% | 12.68% |
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | 0.83% | -6.74% | 29.44% | 26.33% | 41.28% | 11.53% | 13.95% | 13.73% |
TDG TransDigm Group Incorporated | -0.53% | -12.01% | -12.25% | -9.10% | -10.88% | 22.33% | 18.39% | 23.84% |
Monthly Returns
Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Apr 18, 2007, Aerospace Comparison's average daily return is +0.06%, while the average monthly return is +1.36%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 4.3 years.
Historically, 66% of months were positive and 34% were negative. The best month was Nov 2020 with a return of +20.5%, while the worst month was Mar 2020 at -20.4%. The longest winning streak lasted 10 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 5 months.
On a daily basis, Aerospace Comparison closed higher 54% of trading days. The best single day was Oct 28, 2008 with a return of +10.6%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -12.0%.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 14.42% | 1.77% | -4.90% | 2.42% | 13.41% | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2.97% | 2.53% | 4.42% | 4.30% | 6.32% | 2.64% | 2.24% | 0.01% | 8.03% | -1.61% | -3.15% | 2.90% | 35.92% |
| 2024 | 3.05% | 2.89% | 5.52% | 1.56% | 5.26% | -3.47% | 6.46% | 4.72% | 0.04% | -1.84% | -1.85% | -6.99% | 15.38% |
| 2023 | 1.31% | 0.70% | 0.76% | 1.10% | -5.93% | 7.58% | -1.61% | 0.48% | -6.51% | 7.78% | 4.45% | 5.28% | 15.22% |
| 2022 | 2.65% | 15.09% | -0.82% | -3.69% | 1.02% | -0.94% | 0.61% | -1.51% | -8.14% | 16.02% | 2.15% | -0.43% | 21.28% |
| 2021 | -6.98% | 6.79% | 7.99% | 4.52% | 4.23% | -1.72% | 3.29% | -1.14% | -1.71% | 1.52% | -5.71% | 6.21% | 17.20% |
Benchmark Metrics
Aerospace Comparison has an annualized alpha of 9.07%, beta of 0.79, and R² of 0.59 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since April 18, 2007.
- This portfolio captured 104.40% of S&P 500 Index gains but only 72.86% of its losses — a favorable profile for investors.
- This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 9.07% versus S&P 500 Index — delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.
- Alpha
- 9.07%
- Beta
- 0.79
- R²
- 0.59
- Upside Capture
- 104.40%
- Downside Capture
- 72.86%
Expense Ratio
Aerospace Comparison has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.
Return for Risk
Risk / Return Rank
Aerospace Comparison ranks 91 for risk / return — in the top 91% of portfolios on our site. This means strong returns relative to risk — exactly what professional investors look for. Well-suited for investors who want to maximize return per unit of risk.
Return / Risk — by metrics
| Portfolio | Benchmark | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.99 | 0.88 | +1.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.69 | 1.37 | +1.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.21 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.06 | 1.39 | +2.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.53 | 6.43 | +8.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.
| Risk / Return Rank | Sharpe ratio | Sortino ratio | Omega ratio | Calmar ratio | Martin ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BA.L BAE Systems plc | 78 | 1.60 | 2.19 | 1.28 | 2.01 | 5.07 |
RTX Raytheon Technologies Corporation | 87 | 1.79 | 2.31 | 1.36 | 3.44 | 14.23 |
LHX L3Harris Technologies, Inc. | 95 | 2.87 | 3.75 | 1.49 | 6.69 | 18.63 |
GD General Dynamics Corporation | 80 | 1.32 | 1.94 | 1.26 | 2.90 | 10.17 |
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | 81 | 1.55 | 1.99 | 1.29 | 2.74 | 7.01 |
TDG TransDigm Group Incorporated | 23 | -0.39 | -0.32 | 0.95 | -0.42 | -0.90 |
Loading graphics...
Dividends
Dividend yield
Aerospace Comparison provided a 2.64% dividend yield over the last twelve months.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portfolio | 2.64% | 2.73% | 2.95% | 2.60% | 2.43% | 2.31% | 5.57% | 3.86% | 2.46% | 3.23% | 3.67% | 2.31% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||||||
BA.L BAE Systems plc | 1.49% | 1.99% | 2.69% | 2.53% | 2.99% | 4.40% | 4.75% | 4.00% | 4.79% | 3.75% | 3.57% | 4.14% |
RTX Raytheon Technologies Corporation | 1.39% | 1.46% | 2.14% | 2.76% | 2.14% | 2.33% | 21.21% | 1.96% | 2.66% | 2.13% | 2.39% | 2.66% |
LHX L3Harris Technologies, Inc. | 1.36% | 1.64% | 2.21% | 2.17% | 2.15% | 1.91% | 1.80% | 1.45% | 1.86% | 1.55% | 2.01% | 2.23% |
GD General Dynamics Corporation | 1.72% | 1.76% | 2.12% | 2.01% | 2.00% | 2.24% | 2.90% | 2.26% | 2.31% | 1.61% | 1.72% | 1.96% |
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | 2.17% | 2.76% | 2.62% | 2.68% | 2.34% | 2.98% | 2.76% | 2.31% | 3.13% | 2.32% | 2.71% | 2.83% |
TDG TransDigm Group Incorporated | 7.71% | 6.77% | 5.92% | 3.46% | 2.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.16% | 0.00% | 8.01% | 9.64% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
Drawdowns Chart
The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.
Loading graphics...
Worst Drawdowns
The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Aerospace Comparison. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.
The maximum drawdown for the Aerospace Comparison was 48.63%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 485 trading sessions.
The current Aerospace Comparison drawdown is 5.99%.
Depth | Start | To Bottom | Bottom | To Recover | End | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -48.63% | Nov 7, 2007 | 343 | Mar 9, 2009 | 485 | Jan 25, 2011 | 828 |
| -43.19% | Feb 14, 2020 | 27 | Mar 23, 2020 | 289 | May 7, 2021 | 316 |
| -25.24% | Oct 1, 2018 | 61 | Dec 24, 2018 | 89 | May 1, 2019 | 150 |
| -21.39% | May 4, 2011 | 70 | Aug 10, 2011 | 125 | Feb 3, 2012 | 195 |
| -15.95% | Nov 12, 2024 | 38 | Jan 6, 2025 | 92 | May 15, 2025 | 130 |
Volatility
Volatility Chart
The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Diversification
Diversification Metrics
Number of Effective Assets
The portfolio contains 6 assets, with an effective number of assets of 6.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets indicates a moderate level of diversification, where some assets may have a more significant influence on overall performance.
Asset Correlations Table
| Benchmark | BA.L | TDG | LMT | LHX | RTX | GD | Portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | 1.00 | 0.32 | 0.57 | 0.46 | 0.54 | 0.63 | 0.60 | 0.68 |
| BA.L | 0.32 | 1.00 | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.30 | 0.32 | 0.31 | 0.55 |
| TDG | 0.57 | 0.26 | 1.00 | 0.41 | 0.43 | 0.52 | 0.49 | 0.71 |
| LMT | 0.46 | 0.26 | 0.41 | 1.00 | 0.55 | 0.56 | 0.64 | 0.73 |
| LHX | 0.54 | 0.30 | 0.43 | 0.55 | 1.00 | 0.55 | 0.58 | 0.75 |
| RTX | 0.63 | 0.32 | 0.52 | 0.56 | 0.55 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.78 |
| GD | 0.60 | 0.31 | 0.49 | 0.64 | 0.58 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.79 |
| Portfolio | 0.68 | 0.55 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 1.00 |