PortfoliosLab logo
FANG Plus Portfolio
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


Performance

Performance Chart


Loading data...

The earliest data available for this chart is Sep 19, 2014, corresponding to the inception date of BABA

Returns By Period

As of May 14, 2025, the FANG Plus Portfolio returned 8.68% Year-To-Date and 29.29% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


YTD1M6M1Y5Y*10Y*
^GSPC
S&P 500
0.08%9.75%-1.63%12.74%15.66%10.77%
FANG Plus Portfolio8.68%16.41%13.67%41.36%28.56%29.29%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
-3.24%17.13%-12.37%43.78%75.02%74.19%
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
55.27%22.20%43.44%56.94%-7.77%4.29%
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
-17.28%32.40%1.70%94.35%44.42%35.13%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
-3.66%14.33%1.18%13.29%12.14%25.88%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc Class A
-15.63%1.52%-11.96%-5.23%18.84%19.41%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
27.73%23.97%38.92%84.63%20.92%29.33%
BIDU
Baidu, Inc.
8.04%10.11%7.42%-18.52%-1.05%-7.25%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
12.14%20.69%12.37%40.69%26.21%23.49%
AAPL
Apple Inc
-14.77%7.60%-4.81%14.84%23.24%22.20%
TCEHY
Tencent Holdings Limited
22.20%14.77%26.37%36.69%5.56%13.45%
*Annualized

Monthly Returns

The table below presents the monthly returns of FANG Plus Portfolio, with color gradation from worst to best to easily spot seasonal factors. Returns are adjusted for dividends.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20254.77%0.06%-5.39%0.26%9.29%8.68%
2024-0.24%9.01%2.62%-0.03%6.96%4.90%0.52%1.43%11.62%-1.94%5.96%4.79%55.09%
202322.71%0.81%12.15%-5.11%11.60%9.58%8.15%-3.17%-6.52%-4.99%10.16%2.62%69.24%
2022-6.27%-8.43%2.56%-17.91%-1.46%-5.14%8.92%-2.84%-11.32%-8.93%14.00%-6.00%-38.14%
20214.57%0.12%-3.27%6.25%-3.23%7.33%-3.84%4.11%-4.14%11.60%0.26%-2.88%16.53%
20207.74%-0.33%-8.10%16.77%5.84%11.16%12.39%19.91%-6.62%0.36%6.35%9.71%99.78%
201912.37%1.38%3.87%3.19%-15.71%9.91%1.98%-4.58%0.41%7.95%7.29%8.45%38.82%
201816.07%-0.94%-6.65%3.11%6.72%2.78%-2.58%4.21%-2.95%-11.14%-1.29%-8.99%-4.52%
20179.51%1.88%4.94%5.14%9.27%0.01%9.11%3.73%1.14%6.69%0.08%-0.38%63.80%
2016-10.34%-0.22%11.20%-1.50%6.77%-3.62%7.41%4.22%5.15%1.54%-1.97%3.83%22.68%
20153.46%4.37%-2.14%7.12%3.80%0.21%4.74%-4.53%-2.25%15.48%6.93%-2.66%38.32%
2014-3.17%1.33%3.85%-5.81%-4.01%

Expense Ratio

FANG Plus Portfolio has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


The portfolio doesn't include any funds that charge management fees.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

With an overall rank of 88, FANG Plus Portfolio is among the top 12% of portfolios on our website when it comes to balancing risk and reward. Below is a breakdown of how it compares using common performance measures.


The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FANG Plus Portfolio is 8888
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FANG Plus Portfolio is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FANG Plus Portfolio is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FANG Plus Portfolio is 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FANG Plus Portfolio is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FANG Plus Portfolio is 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance Indicators

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for positions. Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Portfolio components
Sharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.741.371.171.263.11
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
1.242.081.260.874.09
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
1.312.081.251.603.91
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
0.390.711.090.371.00
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc Class A
-0.17-0.050.99-0.19-0.42
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
2.623.421.454.4914.68
BIDU
Baidu, Inc.
-0.43-0.340.96-0.23-0.82
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.111.641.211.133.50
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.450.911.130.481.62
TCEHY
Tencent Holdings Limited
1.051.671.230.803.75

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

FANG Plus Portfolio Sharpe ratios as of May 14, 2025 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 1.48
  • 5-Year: 0.96
  • 10-Year: 1.07
  • All Time: 1.07

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 0.59 to 1.09, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio is in the top 25%. This signifies superior risk-adjusted performance, meaning the portfolio is delivering strong returns for the level of risk taken compared to most others.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of FANG Plus Portfolio compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time. For deeper analysis or to customize the calculation, use the Sharpe ratio tool.


Loading data...

Dividends

Dividend yield

FANG Plus Portfolio provided a 0.25% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Portfolio0.25%0.27%0.86%0.50%0.09%0.09%0.16%0.25%0.19%0.26%0.34%0.34%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.03%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%1.70%
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
0.50%0.78%1.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc Class A
0.50%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BIDU
Baidu, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.31%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.47%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%1.67%
TCEHY
Tencent Holdings Limited
0.66%0.81%6.83%4.22%0.35%0.21%0.26%0.29%0.15%0.25%0.24%0.04%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading data...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the FANG Plus Portfolio. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the FANG Plus Portfolio was 48.44%, occurring on Nov 9, 2022. Recovery took 178 trading sessions.

The current FANG Plus Portfolio drawdown is 2.41%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-48.44%Nov 22, 2021244Nov 9, 2022178Jul 28, 2023422
-31.91%Feb 20, 202020Mar 18, 202051Jun 1, 202071
-30.26%Jun 21, 2018129Dec 24, 2018247Dec 17, 2019376
-23.01%Feb 18, 202536Apr 8, 2025
-22.59%Dec 7, 201546Feb 11, 201674May 27, 2016120

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 10 assets, with an effective number of assets of 10.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests that the portfolio's investments are spread across a variety of assets, indicating a well-diversified allocation. However, true diversification also depends on the correlations between assets.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

^GSPCTCEHYTSLABABABIDUNFLXNVDAAAPLMETAAMZNGOOGLPortfolio
^GSPC1.000.160.470.450.460.510.630.690.620.650.700.74
TCEHY0.161.000.130.380.330.130.130.140.130.150.150.37
TSLA0.470.131.000.310.340.390.420.420.360.420.390.64
BABA0.450.380.311.000.660.370.380.370.400.410.410.67
BIDU0.460.330.340.661.000.360.380.380.390.390.420.68
NFLX0.510.130.390.370.361.000.470.440.510.540.480.66
NVDA0.630.130.420.380.380.471.000.520.520.550.530.71
AAPL0.690.140.420.370.380.440.521.000.510.560.580.66
META0.620.130.360.400.390.510.520.511.000.610.650.69
AMZN0.650.150.420.410.390.540.550.560.611.000.680.73
GOOGL0.700.150.390.410.420.480.530.580.650.681.000.71
Portfolio0.740.370.640.670.680.660.710.660.690.730.711.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Sep 22, 2014

AI Insight on Diversification


The portfolio is moderately diversified but leans toward concentration within a specific sector and theme, namely large-cap technology and internet-related companies often grouped under the "FANG Plus" label. The correlation matrix reveals several insights about the portfolio's internal relationships and diversification characteristics.

Firstly, many of the positions exhibit relatively high positive correlations, especially among the U.S.-based tech giants such as AAPL, NVDA, META, GOOGL, and AMZN, with correlations generally ranging from about 0.5 to 0.7. These strong correlations suggest that these stocks tend to move in tandem, which reduces the diversification benefit within this subset of the portfolio.

Among the Chinese tech names (TCEHY, BIDU, BABA), correlations are also moderately high, with BIDU and BABA showing a correlation of 0.66, indicating these positions are somewhat clustered and may respond similarly to regional or sector-specific factors. This clustering reduces diversification across geographic lines within the portfolio.

Tesla (TSLA) stands out with notably lower correlations to TCEHY (0.12) and generally lower correlations to other positions compared to the rest, with most correlations in the 0.3 to 0.4 range. This lower correlation helps improve diversification by introducing some idiosyncratic risk that is less tied to the broader tech and internet sector movements.

Looking at the portfolio’s correlation with individual positions, the portfolio correlates most strongly with AMZN (0.73), NVDA (0.71), and GOOGL (0.71), indicating these stocks have a dominant influence on the portfolio’s overall behavior. This suggests a concentration risk, where the portfolio’s performance is heavily driven by a few large-cap tech names.

On the other hand, TCEHY has the lowest correlation with the portfolio at 0.37, indicating it contributes some diversification benefit by behaving differently from the portfolio’s main drivers.

In summary, while the portfolio includes a few lower-correlated positions like TSLA and TCEHY that help mitigate concentration risk, it remains relatively concentrated in highly correlated large-cap tech stocks. This concentration means the portfolio is exposed to sector-specific risks and may not be well insulated against broad tech market downturns. The diversification benefits are moderate but limited by the strong co-movement among the core tech holdings.

Last updated May 14, 2025