PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
inversion
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


BTC-USD 50.00%MSFT 50.00%CryptocurrencyCryptocurrencyEquityEquity
PositionCategory/SectorTarget Weight
BTC-USD
Bitcoin
50%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
Technology
50%

S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in inversion, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Jul 19, 2012, corresponding to the inception date of BTC-USD

Returns By Period

As of Apr 4, 2026, the inversion returned -23.06% Year-To-Date and 55.34% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.11%-4.18%-3.84%-1.98%21.98%16.86%10.37%12.29%
Portfolio
inversion
0.00%-7.88%-23.06%-36.72%-9.44%23.45%10.33%55.34%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
1.11%-7.83%-22.60%-27.51%0.86%10.00%9.94%22.58%
BTC-USD
Bitcoin
0.01%-7.96%-23.54%-45.31%-19.57%33.40%2.82%65.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Jul 20, 2012, inversion's average daily return is +0.18%, while the average monthly return is +6.46%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 0.9 years.

Historically, 59% of months were positive and 41% were negative. The best month was Nov 2013 with a return of +276.6%, while the worst month was Dec 2013 at -34.3%. The longest winning streak lasted 7 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 7 months.

On a daily basis, inversion closed higher 54% of trading days. The best single day was Nov 18, 2013 with a return of +36.8%, while the worst single day was Mar 12, 2020 at -25.0%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
2026-10.57%-11.70%-2.05%-0.52%-23.06%
20254.13%-11.34%-3.79%9.73%13.77%5.17%7.63%-5.68%3.78%-1.98%-11.00%-2.38%4.63%
20243.17%23.55%9.88%-11.26%8.99%0.49%-1.58%-4.69%5.41%2.50%21.91%-2.25%64.42%
202321.59%0.42%19.84%4.64%0.22%7.41%-2.70%-6.65%-0.11%17.82%10.43%6.13%106.49%
2022-12.10%3.79%4.35%-13.62%-8.34%-19.25%12.98%-10.46%-7.05%2.59%-3.44%-4.99%-46.14%
20219.30%19.28%18.85%2.66%-17.26%2.79%11.69%10.03%-6.95%29.14%-4.02%-9.44%73.66%

Benchmark Metrics

inversion has an annualized alpha of 55.69%, beta of 0.93, and R² of 0.13 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since July 20, 2012.

  • This portfolio captured 296.39% of S&P 500 Index gains but only 82.26% of its losses — a favorable profile for investors.
  • R² of 0.13 means this portfolio moves largely independently of S&P 500 Index — capture ratios reflect limited market correlation rather than active downside protection. Consider using a more representative benchmark.

Alpha
55.69%
Beta
0.93
0.13
Upside Capture
296.39%
Downside Capture
82.26%

Expense Ratio

inversion has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


The portfolio doesn't include any funds that charge management fees.

Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

inversion ranks 1 for risk / return — in the bottom 1% of portfolios on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.


inversion Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
inversion Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
inversion Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
inversion Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
inversion Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
inversion Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.32

0.88

-1.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.27

1.37

-1.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.21

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-1.17

1.39

-2.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-2.23

6.43

-8.67


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
35-0.060.111.01-0.05-0.12
BTC-USD
Bitcoin
36-0.44-0.380.96-1.12-2.00

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

inversion Sharpe ratios as of Apr 4, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: -0.32
  • 5-Year: 0.30
  • 10-Year: 1.35
  • All Time: 1.53

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 0.99 to 1.69, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio places it in the bottom 25%. This suggests weaker risk-adjusted returns than most portfolios, possibly due to lower returns, higher volatility, or both. It may be worth reviewing the allocation. You can use the Portfolio Optimization tool to explore options for improving the Sharpe ratio.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of inversion compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

inversion provided a 0.47% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio0.47%0.35%0.37%0.37%0.53%0.34%0.47%0.60%0.85%0.93%1.18%1.16%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.93%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%
BTC-USD
Bitcoin
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the inversion. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the inversion was 59.89%, occurring on Jan 31, 2015. Recovery took 676 trading sessions.

The current inversion drawdown is 38.00%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-59.89%Dec 5, 2013423Jan 31, 2015676Dec 7, 20161099
-58.35%Nov 9, 2021366Nov 9, 2022457Feb 9, 2024823
-55.26%Dec 17, 2017409Jan 29, 2019145Jun 23, 2019554
-50.3%Apr 10, 20137Apr 16, 2013189Oct 23, 2013196
-40.39%Feb 15, 202027Mar 12, 202090Jun 10, 2020117

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 2 assets, with an effective number of assets of 2.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkBTC-USDMSFTPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.150.710.38
BTC-USD0.151.000.090.92
MSFT0.710.091.000.38
Portfolio0.380.920.381.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Jul 20, 2012