PortfoliosLab logo
Quality Growth Less SC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


Performance

Performance Chart


Loading data...

The earliest data available for this chart is May 18, 2012, corresponding to the inception date of META

Returns By Period

As of May 15, 2025, the Quality Growth Less SC returned 1.30% Year-To-Date and 24.38% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


YTD1M6M1Y5Y*10Y*
^GSPC
S&P 500
0.19%9.00%-1.55%12.31%15.59%10.78%
Quality Growth Less SC1.30%9.86%3.64%17.83%21.64%24.38%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
7.67%16.79%6.95%9.56%20.98%27.00%
AAPL
Apple Inc
-15.01%4.98%-5.45%13.81%23.29%22.14%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc Class A
-12.54%3.96%-7.34%-2.45%19.40%19.83%
V
Visa Inc.
13.17%6.53%15.57%29.52%15.07%18.61%
MA
Mastercard Inc
9.21%11.87%10.19%26.96%16.21%20.70%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
-4.17%15.45%-1.80%12.39%11.82%25.79%
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
2.01%-5.18%-2.95%-0.21%2.29%6.57%
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
-4.56%-5.97%-3.95%-2.32%9.33%9.94%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
29.13%23.59%38.60%87.56%20.51%29.44%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
12.71%24.06%13.88%40.25%25.82%23.53%
ADBE
Adobe Inc
-10.17%13.84%-24.98%-16.07%1.81%17.64%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
8.48%1.38%6.45%28.12%29.30%23.41%
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
-7.15%-5.14%-11.56%-5.73%36.73%27.98%
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
-13.91%37.78%5.28%95.82%45.70%35.64%
*Annualized

Monthly Returns

The table below presents the monthly returns of Quality Growth Less SC, with color gradation from worst to best to easily spot seasonal factors. Returns are adjusted for dividends.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20252.92%-0.92%-6.91%1.28%5.36%1.30%
20243.54%4.58%-0.04%-3.67%6.03%6.47%-1.25%3.23%1.51%-1.65%6.12%1.00%28.38%
20239.10%-1.91%10.70%3.91%5.76%7.05%2.48%-0.17%-5.16%1.39%10.12%1.86%53.78%
2022-5.47%-5.13%4.01%-10.60%-2.39%-6.78%11.37%-5.10%-9.63%4.66%5.32%-6.64%-25.42%
2021-0.59%-0.03%1.89%6.69%-1.56%6.39%5.02%3.57%-5.28%8.02%0.68%3.57%31.30%
20206.54%-6.24%-5.77%15.10%4.62%6.97%6.79%13.53%-6.89%-4.31%8.62%5.58%50.20%
20197.87%4.10%5.12%5.75%-6.46%7.42%2.73%-0.57%0.45%4.98%5.20%5.12%49.37%
20189.08%0.26%-3.18%2.04%6.75%2.25%3.31%8.13%0.30%-6.11%-0.57%-8.13%13.32%
20175.72%4.88%2.94%3.09%4.68%-2.67%4.67%3.31%-0.43%7.45%2.06%0.41%42.15%
2016-4.58%-3.38%7.83%-4.28%4.64%-2.74%7.45%1.21%2.61%1.74%-3.20%3.10%9.73%
2015-0.59%7.06%-3.74%6.87%2.00%-1.09%7.18%-4.76%-0.67%11.49%2.79%-0.76%27.37%
2014-1.28%5.68%-2.31%-0.40%5.08%2.45%0.58%5.54%-0.14%2.33%4.02%-2.92%19.70%

Expense Ratio

Quality Growth Less SC has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


The portfolio doesn't include any funds that charge management fees.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

The current rank of Quality Growth Less SC is 63, indicating average performance compared to other portfolios on our website. Here’s a breakdown of how it compares using common performance measures.


The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of Quality Growth Less SC is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of Quality Growth Less SC is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of Quality Growth Less SC is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of Quality Growth Less SC is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of Quality Growth Less SC is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of Quality Growth Less SC is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance Indicators

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for positions. Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Portfolio components
Sharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.300.761.100.430.96
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.380.851.120.441.44
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc Class A
-0.120.141.02-0.06-0.13
V
Visa Inc.
1.281.811.271.926.41
MA
Mastercard Inc
1.241.741.251.556.48
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
0.380.761.100.411.09
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
-0.060.121.02-0.01-0.02
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
-0.15-0.040.99-0.20-0.45
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
2.723.441.464.5314.80
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.021.731.231.213.76
ADBE
Adobe Inc
-0.48-0.430.93-0.34-0.83
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
1.231.811.251.654.79
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
-0.230.081.01-0.20-0.39
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
1.392.171.261.754.22

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

Quality Growth Less SC Sharpe ratios as of May 15, 2025 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 0.84
  • 5-Year: 1.01
  • 10-Year: 1.13
  • All Time: 1.32

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 0.54 to 1.03, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and return—likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of Quality Growth Less SC compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time. For deeper analysis or to customize the calculation, use the Sharpe ratio tool.


Loading data...

Dividends

Dividend yield

Quality Growth Less SC provided a 0.78% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Portfolio0.78%0.71%0.78%0.76%0.61%0.83%0.86%1.15%1.29%1.37%1.48%1.30%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.88%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%2.48%
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.48%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%1.67%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc Class A
0.48%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
V
Visa Inc.
0.79%0.68%0.72%0.76%0.62%0.56%0.56%0.67%0.61%0.75%0.64%0.64%
MA
Mastercard Inc
0.50%0.50%0.53%0.56%0.49%0.45%0.44%0.53%0.58%0.74%0.66%0.51%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
3.39%3.40%3.00%2.52%2.45%2.53%2.57%2.74%2.38%2.73%2.87%2.64%
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
2.58%2.36%2.55%2.38%2.08%2.24%2.37%3.09%2.98%3.18%3.32%2.78%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.31%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ADBE
Adobe Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.48%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%0.97%
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
0.75%0.67%0.78%1.07%1.23%1.75%1.96%1.94%2.46%2.77%2.37%2.84%
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading data...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Quality Growth Less SC. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the Quality Growth Less SC was 30.45%, occurring on Nov 3, 2022. Recovery took 152 trading sessions.

The current Quality Growth Less SC drawdown is 2.94%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-30.45%Dec 28, 2021216Nov 3, 2022152Jun 14, 2023368
-26.94%Feb 20, 202023Mar 23, 202052Jun 5, 202075
-21.29%Oct 2, 201858Dec 24, 201859Mar 21, 2019117
-18.8%Feb 14, 202537Apr 8, 2025
-14.65%Dec 7, 201543Feb 8, 2016119Jul 28, 2016162

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 14 assets, with an effective number of assets of 9.52, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets indicates a moderate level of diversification, where some assets may have a more significant influence on overall performance.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

^GSPCPGLLYJNJTSLANFLXCOSTMETAAAPLVAMZNMAADBEGOOGLMSFTPortfolio
^GSPC1.000.430.430.450.450.480.560.560.640.680.640.700.670.690.720.86
PG0.431.000.320.480.100.150.400.160.250.360.210.360.270.250.320.38
LLY0.430.321.000.440.140.200.300.260.240.300.260.300.300.280.320.41
JNJ0.450.480.441.000.100.150.330.170.230.380.210.370.270.270.280.38
TSLA0.450.100.140.101.000.370.260.340.380.290.400.310.380.380.370.49
NFLX0.480.150.200.150.371.000.290.460.390.360.520.380.480.460.440.61
COST0.560.400.300.330.260.291.000.310.380.410.400.410.420.400.450.54
META0.560.160.260.170.340.460.311.000.450.430.570.420.510.600.500.66
AAPL0.640.250.240.230.380.390.380.451.000.440.500.450.490.530.560.74
V0.680.360.300.380.290.360.410.430.441.000.470.830.560.520.530.68
AMZN0.640.210.260.210.400.520.400.570.500.471.000.490.580.650.600.75
MA0.700.360.300.370.310.380.410.420.450.830.491.000.560.530.550.70
ADBE0.670.270.300.270.380.480.420.510.490.560.580.561.000.590.660.74
GOOGL0.690.250.280.270.380.460.400.600.530.520.650.530.591.000.650.78
MSFT0.720.320.320.280.370.440.450.500.560.530.600.550.660.651.000.84
Portfolio0.860.380.410.380.490.610.540.660.740.680.750.700.740.780.841.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from May 21, 2012