PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
001
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


XRP-USD 33.33%^RTSI 33.33%^GSPC 33.33%CryptocurrencyCryptocurrencyEquityEquity
PositionCategory/SectorTarget Weight
XRP-USD
XRP
33.33%
^RTSI
RTS Index
33.33%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
33.33%

S&P 500 Index

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right asset allocation for 001

Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in 001, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading charts...

Returns By Period


Position1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.30%0.09%8.18%8.17%23.42%19.88%11.91%13.45%
Portfolio
001
0.09%-5.67%-10.53%-12.89%-9.42%27.60%13.54%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
0.30%0.09%8.18%8.17%23.42%19.88%11.91%13.45%
^RTSI
RTS Index
-1.70%1.53%0.37%-0.37%0.87%2.07%-7.45%2.17%
XRP-USD
XRP
-0.09%-18.75%-37.24%-44.31%-49.12%28.98%4.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Jan 2, 2017, 001's average daily return is +0.19%, while the average monthly return is +7.96%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 0.8 years.

Historically, 48% of months were positive and 52% were negative. The best month was Dec 2017 with a return of +301.8%, while the worst month was Dec 2020 at -34.3%. The longest winning streak lasted 6 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 8 months.

On a daily basis, 001 closed higher 50% of trading days. The best single day was Apr 2, 2017 with a return of +80.1%, while the worst single day was Apr 3, 2017 at -33.1%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
2026-1.70%-5.72%-4.60%5.53%1.50%-5.52%-10.53%
202518.46%-6.51%-3.49%1.88%1.95%2.92%10.38%-1.02%-0.85%-4.52%-0.97%-2.80%13.75%
2024-4.23%6.63%3.60%-7.16%1.07%-0.11%8.49%-7.27%5.66%-10.44%84.31%6.04%84.53%
20239.58%-5.17%17.85%-2.40%3.69%-2.87%19.30%-11.51%-2.91%7.11%4.21%1.00%39.12%
2022-13.58%-5.73%6.37%-9.56%-2.15%-0.17%2.93%-3.76%7.53%3.46%-1.57%-11.77%-26.73%
202141.41%-7.14%20.90%61.22%-18.00%-13.45%2.15%22.46%-8.84%9.22%-7.41%-5.35%98.27%

Benchmark Metrics

001 has an annualized alpha of 52.62%, beta of 0.79, and R2 of 0.07 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since January 02, 2017.

  • This portfolio captured 212.27% of S&P 500 Index gains but only 76.99% of its losses - a favorable profile for investors.
  • R2 of 0.07 means this portfolio moves largely independently of S&P 500 Index - capture ratios reflect limited market correlation rather than active downside protection. Consider using a more representative benchmark.

Alpha
52.62%
Beta
0.79
0.07
Upside Capture
212.27%
Downside Capture
76.99%

Expense Ratio

001 has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


The portfolio doesn't include any funds that charge management fees.

Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

001 ranks 3 for risk / return — in the bottom 3% of Portfolios on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.


001 Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
001 Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
001 Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
001 Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
001 Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
001 Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics

The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for 001 and compares them with S&P 500 Index.


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

1.94

-2.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

2.63

-3.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.35

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.34

2.59

-2.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.57

11.84

-12.41


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

PositionRisk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
681.942.631.352.5911.84
^RTSI
RTS Index
9-0.060.071.01-0.07-0.15
XRP-USD
XRP
50-0.73-0.960.90-0.71-1.13

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

001 Sharpe ratios as of Jun 9, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: -0.38
  • 5-Year: 0.37
  • All Time: 1.02

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.59 to 2.46, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio places it in the bottom 25%. This suggests weaker risk-adjusted returns than most portfolios, possibly due to lower returns, higher volatility, or both. It may be worth reviewing the allocation. You can use the Portfolio Optimization tool to explore options for improving the Sharpe ratio.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of 001 compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading charts...

Dividends

Dividend yield


001 doesn't pay dividends

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading charts...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the 001. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the 001 was 61.75%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 331 trading sessions.

The current 001 drawdown is 25.85%.


Related event

Drawdown

Fall

Recovery

Underwater

COVID crash2020
-61.75%Mar 2020
2y 2mo11mo 1d
3y 1moJan 2018 - Feb 2021
Bear market2022
-49.06%Jul 2022
1y 2mo2y 4mo
3y 7moApr 2021 - Nov 2024
2017 bear market2017
-43.17%May 2017
9d6mo 20d
6mo 29dMay 2017 - Dec 2017
2017 bear market2017
-35.93%Apr 2017
17d14d
1mo 1dApr 2017 - May 2017
2026 bear market2026
-27.54%Mar 2026
8mo 10d
10mo 21dJul 2025 - now

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 3 assets, with an effective number of assets of 3.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is spread almost evenly across your holdings, indicating a well-balanced allocation. Note that true diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.


Diversification Ratio
1Y
3Y
5Y
All Time
Diversification Ratio

1.32

1.32

1.36

1.27

The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.27, in line with the typical range across portfolios. There's room to improve by adding less correlated assets.

001 correlation to the S&P 500 Index

001 has a 0.58 correlation to S&P 500 Index over the trailing 12 months. This section compares each holding's correlation to the benchmark and to the portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2017

0.42


Benchmark Correlations

Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. ^GSPC has the highest benchmark correlation at 1.00, while ^RTSI has the lowest at 0.21.

^RTSI
0.21
^GSPC
1.00

Portfolio Correlations

Correlation vs. 001. XRP-USD has the highest portfolio correlation at 0.91, while ^RTSI has the lowest at 0.33.

^RTSI
0.33
^GSPC
0.35

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

^RTSIXRP-USD^GSPC
^RTSI1.000.070.19
XRP-USD0.071.000.19
^GSPC0.190.191.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Jan 2, 2017
Diversification Analysis

Find what 001 is missing

See which holdings overlap, where 001 is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.

Analyze Diversification