PortfoliosLab logo
Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


Performance

Performance Chart


Loading data...

The earliest data available for this chart is Jan 2, 1987, corresponding to the inception date of APD

Returns By Period

As of May 11, 2025, the Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio returned 4.08% Year-To-Date and 9.54% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


YTD1M6M1Y5Y*10Y*
^GSPC
S&P 500
-3.77%7.44%-5.60%8.37%14.12%10.46%
Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio4.08%3.45%2.72%18.31%11.88%9.54%
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
-4.78%-2.99%-4.81%-3.18%9.14%10.11%
MMM
3M Company
11.01%7.24%7.24%47.43%7.39%4.00%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
14.10%-0.34%11.98%14.81%12.59%8.99%
WMT
Walmart Inc.
7.60%7.00%14.86%61.56%20.37%16.29%
CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company
-0.09%-1.62%-1.89%-3.53%7.80%5.33%
APD
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.
-5.37%3.47%-12.31%10.96%5.61%9.62%
IBM
International Business Machines Corporation
14.87%9.28%19.09%53.60%21.64%8.83%
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
2.44%-3.23%1.36%0.82%2.71%5.35%
EMR
Emerson Electric Co.
-8.80%12.85%-10.82%-0.83%17.70%9.35%
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
7.49%3.72%0.79%6.18%3.55%7.32%
*Annualized

Monthly Returns

The table below presents the monthly returns of Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio, with color gradation from worst to best to easily spot seasonal factors. Returns are adjusted for dividends.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20256.58%2.90%-3.00%-2.56%0.40%4.08%
20240.72%2.35%4.46%-1.09%3.77%1.50%5.81%5.60%2.14%-3.66%7.23%-5.62%24.84%
2023-3.46%-4.54%3.50%2.74%-6.00%6.79%2.46%-0.43%-4.70%-0.08%3.33%2.42%1.15%
2022-2.26%-5.03%2.87%1.36%-1.39%-2.71%2.20%-3.57%-7.53%10.29%8.74%-1.31%0.16%
2021-3.72%-1.17%7.87%1.39%2.84%-0.78%1.86%0.17%-5.35%2.96%-3.44%9.37%11.50%
20200.90%-8.13%-7.47%10.54%2.83%-0.84%5.84%5.51%-1.57%-3.64%8.18%1.35%12.28%
20195.62%3.31%3.05%2.69%-5.26%7.31%1.39%-0.54%2.72%-1.77%2.74%2.28%25.54%
20182.05%-6.64%-0.90%-4.24%-0.88%1.54%5.81%1.92%0.91%-5.17%5.49%-5.88%-6.77%
20171.09%5.70%0.14%-0.04%2.54%-0.17%-0.34%0.30%0.92%3.40%3.69%1.51%20.18%
20160.10%2.03%7.05%-1.16%1.05%3.33%1.79%-0.52%-0.18%-3.96%1.16%1.19%12.13%
2015-3.55%3.55%-2.46%-0.84%0.35%-3.71%1.61%-6.43%-0.92%4.73%0.75%0.71%-6.58%
2014-4.96%3.79%2.18%2.76%-0.43%0.68%-2.49%3.30%0.07%1.42%4.94%-1.11%10.15%

Expense Ratio

Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


The portfolio doesn't include any funds that charge management fees.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

With an overall rank of 88, Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio is among the top 12% of portfolios on our website when it comes to balancing risk and reward. Below is a breakdown of how it compares using common performance measures.


The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio is 8888
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio is 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio is 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance Indicators

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for positions. Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Portfolio components
Sharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
-0.14-0.060.99-0.22-0.50
MMM
3M Company
1.412.671.361.229.30
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
0.941.451.181.032.27
WMT
Walmart Inc.
2.503.341.462.829.42
CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company
-0.12-0.031.00-0.12-0.22
APD
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.
0.390.841.110.451.27
IBM
International Business Machines Corporation
2.002.731.393.2710.01
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
0.040.221.030.090.20
EMR
Emerson Electric Co.
-0.030.521.070.230.60
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
0.340.621.090.411.10

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio Sharpe ratios as of May 11, 2025 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 1.29
  • 5-Year: 0.85
  • 10-Year: 0.62
  • All Time: 0.74

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 0.41 to 0.94, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio is in the top 25%. This signifies superior risk-adjusted performance, meaning the portfolio is delivering strong returns for the level of risk taken compared to most others.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time. For deeper analysis or to customize the calculation, use the Sharpe ratio tool.


Loading data...

Dividends

Dividend yield

Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio provided a 2.46% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Portfolio2.46%2.49%3.06%2.89%2.64%2.75%2.77%3.20%2.69%2.82%2.78%2.09%
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
2.59%2.36%2.55%2.38%2.08%2.24%2.37%3.09%2.98%3.18%3.31%2.78%
MMM
3M Company
1.98%2.60%5.49%4.97%3.33%3.36%3.26%2.86%2.00%2.49%2.72%2.08%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
2.79%3.12%3.12%2.77%2.84%2.99%2.89%3.29%3.23%3.38%3.07%2.89%
WMT
Walmart Inc.
0.92%0.92%1.45%1.58%1.52%1.50%1.78%2.23%2.07%2.89%3.20%2.24%
CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company
2.25%2.18%2.40%2.36%2.10%2.05%2.48%2.79%2.11%2.37%2.25%2.05%
APD
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.
2.62%1.83%2.56%2.10%1.97%1.96%1.97%2.75%2.32%1.20%0.00%0.00%
IBM
International Business Machines Corporation
2.68%3.03%4.05%4.68%4.74%5.17%4.80%5.46%3.85%3.31%3.63%2.65%
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
3.70%3.72%3.88%3.42%3.19%3.17%3.00%3.51%3.22%3.22%2.77%0.73%
EMR
Emerson Electric Co.
1.87%1.70%2.14%2.15%2.18%2.49%2.58%3.26%2.76%3.42%3.94%2.85%
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
3.22%3.40%3.00%2.52%2.45%2.53%2.57%2.74%2.38%2.73%2.87%2.64%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading data...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio was 35.95%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 181 trading sessions.

The current Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio drawdown is 5.10%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-35.95%Jun 6, 2008190Mar 9, 2009181Nov 23, 2009371
-35.63%Aug 26, 198738Oct 19, 1987444Jul 21, 1989482
-28.71%Jan 10, 200043Mar 10, 2000187Dec 5, 2000230
-27.63%Feb 7, 202031Mar 23, 202096Aug 7, 2020127
-21.42%Mar 20, 200286Jul 22, 2002353Dec 12, 2003439

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 10 assets, with an effective number of assets of 10.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests that the portfolio's investments are spread across a variety of assets, indicating a well-diversified allocation. However, true diversification also depends on the correlations between assets.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

^GSPCWMTIBMKMBJNJAPDEMRCLKOMMMPGPortfolio
^GSPC1.000.520.590.420.500.570.630.450.510.600.490.79
WMT0.521.000.320.310.350.310.320.340.370.350.370.60
IBM0.590.321.000.270.320.350.430.300.310.400.300.59
KMB0.420.310.271.000.350.330.290.480.390.350.490.61
JNJ0.500.350.320.351.000.320.320.390.430.380.450.61
APD0.570.310.350.330.321.000.470.330.350.460.330.64
EMR0.630.320.430.290.320.471.000.310.340.510.330.65
CL0.450.340.300.480.390.330.311.000.460.350.560.65
KO0.510.370.310.390.430.350.340.461.000.380.500.65
MMM0.600.350.400.350.380.460.510.350.381.000.380.67
PG0.490.370.300.490.450.330.330.560.500.381.000.67
Portfolio0.790.600.590.610.610.640.650.650.650.670.671.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Jan 5, 1987

AI Insight on Diversification


The portfolio is moderately diversified, composed of dividend-paying stocks with generally positive correlations ranging mostly between 0.27 and 0.67. The correlation matrix reveals that while no pair of stocks exhibits extremely high correlation (e.g., above 0.8), several positions show moderately strong correlations that could somewhat limit diversification benefits.

Notably, Procter & Gamble (PG) and Clorox (CL) have a correlation of 0.56, and PG also correlates strongly with Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at 0.49. These elevated correlations among consumer staples suggest some clustering within that sector, which may reduce the effectiveness of risk reduction through diversification in that segment.

On the other hand, IBM shows relatively lower correlations with many other stocks, such as 0.27 with KMB and around 0.3 with several others, indicating it contributes positively to diversification by behaving somewhat independently compared to the rest of the portfolio.

The portfolio’s correlation with individual positions ranges from 0.59 (IBM) to 0.67 (MMM and PG), indicating that no single stock overwhelmingly dominates the portfolio’s overall behavior. However, the slightly higher correlations of MMM and PG with the portfolio suggest these positions may have a somewhat larger influence on portfolio returns and risk.

Overall, the portfolio is neither highly concentrated nor extremely diversified. It leans toward moderate concentration within consumer staples and industrials, with some diversification benefits coming from less correlated stocks like IBM. This structure provides a balance between income stability from dividend payers and some risk mitigation through moderate diversification.

Last updated May 11, 2025