PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


S&P 500 Index

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right asset allocation for Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio

Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of Jun 5, 2026, the Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio returned 6.60% Year-To-Date and 10.10% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


Position1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.41%4.48%10.79%10.60%27.02%21.07%12.39%13.65%
Portfolio
Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio
0.09%1.69%6.60%4.33%8.66%15.96%8.86%10.10%
APD
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.
0.21%-6.94%16.06%9.59%3.65%2.98%1.01%9.52%
CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company
0.27%-1.42%9.03%11.02%-3.27%6.21%2.68%4.13%
EMR
Emerson Electric Co.
0.84%3.07%7.88%4.79%18.72%22.22%9.85%13.05%
IBM
International Business Machines Corporation
-1.26%32.73%3.21%-0.74%16.56%35.83%21.09%12.12%
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
2.21%1.74%11.48%13.94%52.64%16.30%9.61%9.99%
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
-0.31%-2.81%-5.21%-7.76%-28.72%-8.08%-2.88%0.25%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
-2.46%-2.12%10.64%9.79%10.76%11.41%9.65%8.76%
MMM
3M Company
0.74%7.52%-3.65%-8.87%6.01%26.96%1.17%4.05%
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
0.42%-2.84%-0.32%-1.73%-12.73%1.40%3.30%8.37%
WMT
Walmart Inc.
0.73%-9.81%6.10%3.14%19.50%34.55%21.56%19.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Jan 5, 1987, Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio's average daily return is +0.05%, while the average monthly return is +1.09%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 5.3 years.

Historically, 65% of months were positive and 35% were negative. The best month was Oct 1998 with a return of +17.2%, while the worst month was Oct 1987 at -20.2%. The longest winning streak lasted 8 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 6 months.

On a daily basis, Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio closed higher 54% of trading days. The best single day was Oct 13, 2008 with a return of +10.1%, while the worst single day was Oct 19, 1987 at -20.6%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20266.56%4.97%-7.05%1.66%1.80%-0.93%6.60%
20256.58%2.90%-3.00%-2.56%4.68%0.90%-1.60%1.21%0.37%0.81%2.74%-3.03%9.92%
20240.72%2.35%4.46%-1.09%3.77%1.50%5.81%5.60%2.14%-3.66%7.23%-5.62%24.84%
2023-3.46%-4.54%3.50%2.74%-6.00%6.79%2.46%-0.43%-4.70%-0.08%3.33%2.42%1.15%
2022-2.26%-5.03%2.87%1.36%-1.39%-2.71%2.20%-3.57%-7.53%10.29%8.74%-1.31%0.16%
2021-3.72%-1.17%7.87%1.39%2.84%-0.78%1.86%0.17%-5.35%2.96%-3.44%9.37%11.50%

Benchmark Metrics

Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio has an annualized alpha of 5.72%, beta of 0.76, and R2 of 0.70 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since January 05, 1987.

  • This portfolio participates in less of S&P 500 Index's moves in both directions, but captures a larger share of gains (88.97%) than losses (70.10%) - typical of diversified or defensive assets.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 5.72% versus S&P 500 Index - delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.

Alpha
5.72%
Beta
0.76
0.70
Upside Capture
88.97%
Downside Capture
70.10%

Expense Ratio

Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


The portfolio doesn't include any funds that charge management fees.

Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio ranks 9 for risk / return — in the bottom 9% of Portfolios on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.


Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics

The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio and compares them with S&P 500 Index.


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.73

2.28

-1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

1.11

3.12

-2.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.41

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

2.98

-2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.39

13.78

-11.39


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

PositionRisk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
APD
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.
440.150.401.050.160.41
CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company
33-0.16-0.080.99-0.18-0.29
EMR
Emerson Electric Co.
580.631.051.130.801.77
IBM
International Business Machines Corporation
540.430.861.120.541.17
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
943.164.591.574.8314.43
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
4-1.16-1.480.79-0.97-1.51
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
620.671.131.121.372.68
MMM
3M Company
470.230.521.060.320.72
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
11-0.70-0.900.90-0.82-1.44
WMT
Walmart Inc.
660.831.301.171.244.17

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio Sharpe ratios as of Jun 5, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 0.73
  • 5-Year: 0.67
  • 10-Year: 0.67
  • All Time: 0.77

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.84 to 2.81, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio places it in the bottom 25%. This suggests weaker risk-adjusted returns than most portfolios, possibly due to lower returns, higher volatility, or both. It may be worth reviewing the allocation. You can use the Portfolio Optimization tool to explore options for improving the Sharpe ratio.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading charts...

Dividends

Dividend yield

Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio provided a 2.49% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio2.49%2.54%3.85%3.06%2.89%2.64%2.75%2.77%3.20%2.69%2.94%3.03%
APD
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.
2.54%2.89%1.83%2.56%2.10%1.97%1.96%1.97%2.75%2.32%2.39%2.49%
CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company
2.46%2.61%2.18%2.40%2.36%2.10%2.05%2.48%2.79%2.11%2.37%2.25%
EMR
Emerson Electric Co.
1.54%1.61%1.70%2.14%2.15%2.18%2.49%2.58%3.26%2.76%3.42%3.94%
IBM
International Business Machines Corporation
2.23%2.27%3.03%4.05%4.68%4.74%5.17%4.80%5.46%3.85%3.31%3.63%
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
2.30%2.48%3.40%3.00%2.52%2.45%2.53%2.57%2.74%2.38%2.73%2.87%
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
5.36%5.00%3.72%3.88%3.42%3.19%3.17%3.00%3.51%3.22%3.22%2.77%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
2.68%2.92%3.12%3.12%2.77%2.84%2.99%2.89%3.29%3.23%3.38%3.07%
MMM
3M Company
1.98%1.82%16.27%5.49%4.97%3.33%3.36%3.26%2.86%2.00%2.49%2.72%
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
3.03%2.91%2.36%2.55%2.38%2.08%2.24%2.37%3.09%2.98%3.18%3.31%
WMT
Walmart Inc.
0.82%0.84%0.92%1.45%1.58%1.52%1.50%1.78%2.23%2.07%2.89%3.20%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading charts...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio was 35.62%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 176 trading sessions.

The current Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio drawdown is 5.26%.


Related event

Drawdown

Fall

Recovery

Underwater

Financial crisis2007–2009
-35.62%Mar 2009
9mo 6d8mo 12d
1y 5moJun 2008 - Nov 2009
Black Monday1987
-35.60%Oct 1987
1mo 24d1y 8mo
1y 10moAug 1987 - Jun 1989
Dot-com crash2000–2002
-28.65%Mar 2000
2mo8mo 29d
10mo 29dJan 2000 - Dec 2000
COVID crash2020
-27.63%Mar 2020
1mo 15d4mo 17d
6mo 2dFeb 2020 - Aug 2020
Dot-com crash2000–2002
-21.38%Jul 2002
4mo 4d1y 4mo
1y 8moMar 2002 - Dec 2003

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Diversification

AI Analysis


Thesis

The portfolio is a 10-stock equal-weight bet on defensive earnings streams, with a few industrial and technology sleeves that keep it from being just a grocery-list version of the consumer-staples trade.

The numbers

  • The diversification ratio is 2.02 over 1Y and 1.49 in inception data, both strong by platform standards at the 89.7th and 75.7th percentiles, respectively.
  • Effective asset count is 10.0 of 10, so the weight structure is tidy; the math says this is broad ownership, not one hidden hero.
  • Average pairwise correlation is 0.37, which is low enough to matter, though several consumer staples names still behave like cousins.

What works

  • The portfolio mixes Consumer Defensive, Industrials, Basic Materials, Technology, and Healthcare, so the earnings drivers are not all the same quarterly sermon.
  • IBM, WMT, APD, and JNJ sit in separate clusters, which helps keep portfolio-level movement from becoming a single-factor impression.
  • To be fair, the 1Y diversification is better than the long-run figure, so the sleeve interactions have recently been doing some work.

What does not

  • Procter & Gamble (PG), Coca-Cola (KO), Clorox (CL), and Kimberly-Clark (KMB) form a familiar staples knot; their correlations around 0.48-0.57 are not fatal, just repetitive.
  • Emerson Electric (EMR) and 3M (MMM) also travel together, so the industrial piece is thinner than the ticker count suggests.

Stress Scenario

  • A recession-flavored slowdown with sticky input costs would press the staples cluster and the industrial cluster at the same time, making the correlation structure look more unified than it appears in normal markets.

Worth knowing

  • The portfolio’s strongest diversification benefit comes from cross-sector mixing, not from especially uncorrelated individual names.
  • Portfolios with this profile are usually complemented by exposures whose return drivers are less tied to defensive U.S. consumer demand and steady industrial capex.
AI-generated analysis. Not investment advice. Verify key facts independently.
Was this useful?

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 10 assets, with an effective number of assets of 10.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is spread almost evenly across your holdings, indicating a well-balanced allocation. Note that true diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.


Diversification Ratio
1Y
3Y
5Y
10Y
All Time
Diversification Ratio

2.02

1.80

1.65

1.49

1.49

The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.49, in line with the typical range across portfolios. There's room to improve by adding less correlated assets.

Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio correlation to the S&P 500 Index

Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio has a 0.38 correlation to S&P 500 Index over the trailing 12 months. This section compares each holding's correlation to the benchmark and to the portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1987

0.78


Benchmark Correlations

Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. EMR has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.63, while KMB has the lowest at 0.41.

KMB
0.41
CL
0.44
PG
0.47
KO
0.48
JNJ
0.48
WMT
0.50
APD
0.56
IBM
0.58
MMM
0.59
EMR
0.63

Portfolio Correlations

Correlation vs. Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio. PG has the highest portfolio correlation at 0.67, while IBM has the lowest at 0.58.

IBM
0.58
WMT
0.59
KMB
0.61
JNJ
0.61
APD
0.64
KO
0.64
EMR
0.64
CL
0.65
MMM
0.67
PG
0.67

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Jan 5, 1987
Diversification Analysis

Find what Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio is missing

See which holdings overlap, where Dividend-Paying Stocks Portfolio is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.

Analyze Diversification