PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLD and BTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


GLD 70.00%BTC-USD 30.00%CommodityCommodityCryptocurrencyCryptocurrency
PositionCategory/SectorTarget Weight
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
Gold, Precious Metals
70%
BTC-USD
Bitcoin
30%

S&P 500 Index

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right asset allocation for GLD and BTC

Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in GLD and BTC, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of Jun 17, 2026, the GLD and BTC returned -9.09% Year-To-Date and 35.40% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


Position1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
-1.21%0.23%8.39%10.39%24.03%18.94%12.24%13.61%
Portfolio
GLD and BTC
-2.14%-10.14%-9.09%-9.34%3.78%34.67%21.13%35.40%
BTC-USD
Bitcoin
-1.83%-16.28%-26.38%-25.28%-38.41%34.73%12.44%55.71%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
-2.27%-7.13%-1.95%-2.68%24.58%28.86%18.70%12.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Oct 2, 2012, GLD and BTC's average daily return is +0.12%, while the average monthly return is +4.03%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 1.5 years.

Historically, 59% of months were positive and 41% were negative. The best month was Nov 2013 with a return of +179.6%, while the worst month was Dec 2013 at -31.4%. The longest winning streak lasted 8 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 6 months.

On a daily basis, GLD and BTC closed higher 53% of trading days. The best single day was Nov 18, 2013 with a return of +29.8%, while the worst single day was Dec 6, 2013 at -18.4%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20265.57%2.72%-8.41%2.43%-2.20%-8.63%-9.09%
20257.66%-4.15%6.34%8.01%3.45%1.19%1.93%1.40%9.89%1.32%-1.09%0.89%42.49%
2024-0.81%13.67%11.44%-2.49%4.19%-2.02%4.67%-1.17%5.68%6.24%9.33%-2.12%55.48%
202315.98%-3.40%13.33%1.43%-3.06%1.98%0.39%-4.13%-2.45%13.73%4.69%5.07%49.50%
2022-6.10%7.71%2.35%-6.54%-6.45%-9.87%3.18%-6.69%-2.94%0.38%0.75%1.18%-22.00%
20212.03%8.11%12.39%2.00%-4.68%-7.18%7.18%4.34%-4.68%13.32%-3.13%-4.75%24.72%

Benchmark Metrics

GLD and BTC has an annualized alpha of 37.47%, beta of 0.24, and R2 of 0.02 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since October 02, 2012.

  • This portfolio captured 134.50% of S&P 500 Index gains but only 21.40% of its losses - a favorable profile for investors.
  • Beta of 0.24 may look defensive, but with R2 of 0.02 this portfolio is largely uncorrelated with S&P 500 Index - low beta reflects independence, not downside protection. See the Volatility section for a true picture of this portfolio's risk.
  • R2 of 0.02 means this portfolio moves largely independently of S&P 500 Index - capture ratios reflect limited market correlation rather than active downside protection. Consider using a more representative benchmark.

Alpha
37.47%
Beta
0.24
0.02
Upside Capture
134.50%
Downside Capture
21.40%

Expense Ratio

GLD and BTC has an expense ratio of 0.28%, placing it in the medium range. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

GLD and BTC ranks 5 for risk / return — in the bottom 5% of Portfolios on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.


GLD and BTC Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
GLD and BTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD and BTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD and BTC Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD and BTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD and BTC Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics

The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for GLD and BTC and compares them with S&P 500 Index.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.15

1.94

-1.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.36

2.64

-2.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.35

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.15

2.65

-2.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.40

11.88

-11.48


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

PositionRisk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
BTC-USD
Bitcoin
32
-0.90-1.230.87-0.75-1.29
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
24
0.901.261.191.012.82

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk. Learn how to interpret the Sharpe ratio.

The current GLD and BTC Sharpe ratio is 0.15 as of Jun 17, 2026 (the value is recalculated daily), calculated over the past 12 months.

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.65 to 2.50, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio places it in the bottom 25%. This suggests weaker risk-adjusted returns than most portfolios, possibly due to lower returns, higher volatility, or both. It may be worth reviewing the allocation. You can use the Portfolio Optimization tool to explore options for improving the Sharpe ratio.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of GLD and BTC compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading charts...

Dividends

Dividend yield


GLD and BTC doesn't pay dividends

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading charts...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the GLD and BTC. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the GLD and BTC was 54.62%, occurring on Aug 18, 2015. Recovery took 623 trading sessions.

The current GLD and BTC drawdown is 21.23%.


Related event

Drawdown

Fall

Recovery

Underwater

2015 bear market2015
-54.62%Aug 2015
1y 8mo1y 8mo
3y 4moDec 2013 - May 2017
2013 bear market2013
-46.46%Jul 2013
2mo 26d4mo 6d
7mo 2dApr 2013 - Nov 2013
Rate-hike selloffLate 2018
-45.73%Dec 2018
12mo 3d6mo 13d
1y 6moDec 2017 - Jun 2019
Bear market2022
-35.74%Nov 2022
11mo 29d1y 24d
2y 18dNov 2021 - Dec 2023
2026 bear market2026
-25.94%Jun 2026
4mo 12d
4mo 20dJan 2026 - now

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 2 assets, with an effective number of assets of 1.72, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is well-distributed across most of your holdings, with only mild concentration in a few names. True diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.


Diversification Ratio
1Y
3Y
5Y
10Y
All Time
Diversification Ratio

1.29

1.35

1.34

1.31

1.31

The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.31, in line with the typical range across portfolios. There's room to improve by adding less correlated assets.

GLD and BTC correlation to the S&P 500 Index

GLD and BTC has a 0.44 correlation to S&P 500 Index over the trailing 12 months. This section compares each holding's correlation to the benchmark and to the portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2012

0.13


Benchmark Correlations

Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. BTC-USD has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.16, while GLD has the lowest at 0.02.

GLD
0.02

Portfolio Correlations

Correlation vs. GLD and BTC. BTC-USD has the highest portfolio correlation at 0.86, while GLD has the lowest at 0.46.

GLD
0.46

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

GLDBTC-USD
GLD1.000.07
BTC-USD0.071.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Oct 2, 2012
Diversification Analysis

Find what GLD and BTC is missing

See which holdings overlap, where GLD and BTC is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.

Analyze Diversification