PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLK TOP 5
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


AAPL 20.00%MSFT 20.00%NVDA 20.00%CRM 20.00%AVGO 20.00%EquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in XLK TOP 5, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Aug 6, 2009, corresponding to the inception date of AVGO

Returns By Period

As of Apr 2, 2026, the XLK TOP 5 returned -14.44% Year-To-Date and 35.64% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.11%-3.43%-3.84%-1.98%16.08%16.86%10.37%12.29%
Portfolio
XLK TOP 5
0.60%-3.22%-14.44%-12.42%22.59%36.46%29.33%35.64%
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.11%-2.97%-5.78%-0.28%14.80%16.04%16.39%26.10%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
1.11%-7.54%-22.60%-27.29%-1.52%10.00%9.94%22.58%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.93%-1.47%-4.88%-6.08%60.69%85.17%66.71%70.07%
CRM
salesforce.com, inc.
0.50%-4.52%-29.34%-21.52%-30.62%-1.21%-2.83%9.61%
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
0.34%0.44%-8.93%-6.61%84.26%72.07%48.84%38.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Aug 7, 2009, XLK TOP 5's average daily return is +0.13%, while the average monthly return is +2.63%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 2.2 years.

Historically, 66% of months were positive and 34% were negative. The best month was Aug 2020 with a return of +21.7%, while the worst month was Apr 2022 at -16.2%. The longest winning streak lasted 12 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 5 months.

On a daily basis, XLK TOP 5 closed higher 56% of trading days. The best single day was Apr 9, 2025 with a return of +14.2%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -16.2%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
2026-7.45%-5.02%-3.70%1.08%-14.44%
2025-4.02%-4.31%-10.41%3.29%12.47%9.59%4.46%1.02%4.86%7.31%-3.25%-0.41%19.87%
20247.67%11.07%3.25%-5.03%7.49%12.38%-1.06%0.84%4.29%1.08%4.61%8.41%68.97%
202315.88%4.67%16.07%1.27%17.65%5.68%4.12%0.18%-8.64%0.18%14.69%6.27%106.26%
2022-9.25%-3.87%5.91%-16.16%-2.22%-9.02%13.93%-9.73%-12.12%8.14%9.58%-9.30%-33.06%
20211.51%-0.30%-0.64%6.85%1.92%9.64%2.01%7.34%-4.15%13.44%7.88%1.14%55.95%

Benchmark Metrics

XLK TOP 5 has an annualized alpha of 16.95%, beta of 1.30, and R² of 0.70 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since August 07, 2009.

  • This portfolio captured 185.91% of S&P 500 Index gains but only 93.22% of its losses — a favorable profile for investors.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 16.95% versus S&P 500 Index — delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.

Alpha
16.95%
Beta
1.30
0.70
Upside Capture
185.91%
Downside Capture
93.22%

Expense Ratio

XLK TOP 5 has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


The portfolio doesn't include any funds that charge management fees.

Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

XLK TOP 5 ranks 18 for risk / return — in the bottom 18% of portfolios on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.


XLK TOP 5 Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
XLK TOP 5 Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK TOP 5 Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK TOP 5 Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK TOP 5 Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK TOP 5 Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.81

0.88

-0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.35

1.37

-0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.21

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

1.39

-0.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.97

6.43

-3.46


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
AAPL
Apple Inc
550.470.921.130.662.04
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
35-0.060.111.01-0.05-0.12
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
811.472.171.273.027.54
CRM
salesforce.com, inc.
8-0.87-1.130.86-0.79-1.64
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
841.762.491.323.087.50

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

XLK TOP 5 Sharpe ratios as of Apr 2, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 0.81
  • 5-Year: 1.01
  • 10-Year: 1.24
  • All Time: 1.24

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.01 to 1.70, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio places it in the bottom 25%. This suggests weaker risk-adjusted returns than most portfolios, possibly due to lower returns, higher volatility, or both. It may be worth reviewing the allocation. You can use the Portfolio Optimization tool to explore options for improving the Sharpe ratio.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of XLK TOP 5 compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

XLK TOP 5 provided a 0.61% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio0.61%0.49%0.51%0.59%0.98%0.69%0.94%1.21%1.41%1.10%1.23%1.32%
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.41%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.93%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
CRM
salesforce.com, inc.
0.89%0.63%0.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
0.79%0.70%0.94%1.71%3.02%2.24%3.05%3.54%3.11%1.87%1.43%1.13%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the XLK TOP 5. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the XLK TOP 5 was 40.94%, occurring on Oct 14, 2022. Recovery took 148 trading sessions.

The current XLK TOP 5 drawdown is 19.27%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-40.94%Dec 28, 2021202Oct 14, 2022148May 18, 2023350
-33.3%Feb 20, 202018Mar 16, 202055Jun 3, 202073
-29.71%Dec 17, 202474Apr 4, 202558Jun 30, 2025132
-28.2%Oct 4, 201856Dec 24, 201881Apr 23, 2019137
-22.97%Feb 18, 2011128Aug 22, 2011120Feb 13, 2012248

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 5 assets, with an effective number of assets of 5.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkAAPLCRMAVGONVDAMSFTPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.620.600.610.610.710.78
AAPL0.621.000.430.470.460.530.69
CRM0.600.431.000.440.490.550.73
AVGO0.610.470.441.000.560.490.77
NVDA0.610.460.490.561.000.540.81
MSFT0.710.530.550.490.541.000.74
Portfolio0.780.690.730.770.810.741.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Aug 7, 2009