PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ONill
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


ELF 27.00%LNTH 24.00%TGLS 24.00%BELFB 15.00%ACLS 8.00%1 position 2.00%EquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in ONill, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Sep 22, 2016, corresponding to the inception date of ELF

Returns By Period


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
-0.11%2.78%-0.42%4.03%27.10%18.38%10.55%12.70%
Portfolio
ONill
-0.56%2.01%6.06%0.63%33.97%21.35%45.26%
ELF
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.
1.88%-11.28%-14.35%-49.78%21.49%-8.19%18.52%
LNTH
Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
-1.03%1.38%21.10%50.52%-20.99%-2.27%30.81%45.62%
TGLS
Tecnoglass Inc.
-4.43%-4.31%-13.07%-29.32%-38.23%2.36%28.28%18.68%
BELFB
Bel Fuse Inc.
0.31%19.27%39.02%71.30%242.01%89.53%67.01%34.50%
ACLS
Axcelis Technologies, Inc.
1.97%32.67%37.38%39.37%134.58%-4.28%20.01%26.03%
FCNCA
First Citizens BancShares, Inc.
-0.43%12.54%-7.19%17.18%20.55%26.96%18.87%23.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Sep 23, 2016, ONill's average daily return is +0.13%, while the average monthly return is +2.65%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 2.2 years.

Historically, 58% of months were positive and 42% were negative. The best month was Jul 2022 with a return of +24.2%, while the worst month was Mar 2020 at -31.9%. The longest winning streak lasted 7 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 5 months.

On a daily basis, ONill closed higher 53% of trading days. The best single day was Feb 24, 2022 with a return of +13.0%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -19.1%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20266.14%5.31%-11.63%7.39%6.06%
2025-6.01%-8.33%-4.63%-0.81%21.85%9.24%1.25%-3.51%1.70%-1.72%-12.22%6.47%-0.99%
2024-0.72%10.58%1.16%-2.17%11.32%2.79%6.01%-0.88%0.54%-2.88%6.28%-1.40%33.66%
202313.06%15.90%10.73%5.84%6.78%13.46%-0.73%-4.54%-12.28%-5.77%10.75%14.63%85.02%
2022-12.90%23.15%11.99%-2.99%3.46%-2.15%24.24%5.88%-6.49%8.90%16.40%-1.99%80.30%
20211.75%14.66%21.84%6.13%14.94%-0.57%-4.46%11.02%-5.76%12.02%1.99%2.66%102.13%

Benchmark Metrics

ONill has an annualized alpha of 17.72%, beta of 1.19, and R² of 0.40 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since September 23, 2016.

  • This portfolio captured 179.28% of S&P 500 Index gains and 107.50% of its losses — amplifying both gains and losses, but participating more in upside than downside.
  • R² of 0.40 means the benchmark explains less than half of this portfolio's behavior — treat beta with caution or consider switching to a more representative benchmark.

Alpha
17.72%
Beta
1.19
0.40
Upside Capture
179.28%
Downside Capture
107.50%

Expense Ratio

ONill has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


The portfolio doesn't include any funds that charge management fees.

Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

ONill ranks 11 for risk / return — in the bottom 11% of portfolios on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.


ONill Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
ONill Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONill Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONill Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
ONill Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONill Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.15

2.23

-1.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.64

3.12

-1.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.42

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

4.05

-2.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.36

17.91

-12.55


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
ELF
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.
420.300.881.130.470.89
LNTH
Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
21-0.36-0.120.98-0.25-0.36
TGLS
Tecnoglass Inc.
10-0.90-1.290.85-0.55-0.93
BELFB
Bel Fuse Inc.
975.584.941.6514.2344.34
ACLS
Axcelis Technologies, Inc.
872.823.131.406.0514.25
FCNCA
First Citizens BancShares, Inc.
510.781.151.161.162.64

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

ONill Sharpe ratios as of Apr 11, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 1.15
  • 5-Year: 1.31
  • All Time: 0.88

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 2.13 to 3.05, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio places it in the bottom 25%. This suggests weaker risk-adjusted returns than most portfolios, possibly due to lower returns, higher volatility, or both. It may be worth reviewing the allocation. You can use the Portfolio Optimization tool to explore options for improving the Sharpe ratio.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of ONill compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

ONill provided a 0.36% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio0.36%0.32%0.20%0.26%0.35%0.46%0.67%1.84%1.48%1.90%0.63%0.25%
ELF
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LNTH
Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TGLS
Tecnoglass Inc.
1.38%1.19%0.61%0.79%0.91%0.56%1.59%6.79%5.20%7.21%2.04%0.00%
BELFB
Bel Fuse Inc.
0.12%0.17%0.34%0.42%0.85%2.17%1.86%1.37%1.52%1.11%0.91%1.62%
ACLS
Axcelis Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FCNCA
First Citizens BancShares, Inc.
0.41%0.37%0.33%0.27%0.28%0.23%0.29%0.30%0.38%0.31%0.34%0.46%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the ONill. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the ONill was 57.73%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 190 trading sessions.

The current ONill drawdown is 7.88%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-57.73%Feb 14, 202023Mar 18, 2020190Dec 16, 2020213
-36.58%Jan 12, 2018239Dec 24, 2018189Sep 25, 2019428
-33.74%Jul 15, 2024185Apr 8, 202545Jun 12, 2025230
-26.8%Jul 19, 202380Nov 8, 202373Feb 26, 2024153
-26.29%Sep 19, 202545Nov 20, 2025

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 6 assets, with an effective number of assets of 4.60, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkTGLSLNTHELFFCNCABELFBACLSPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.350.370.420.500.440.590.58
TGLS0.351.000.190.240.310.280.280.60
LNTH0.370.191.000.220.290.260.310.62
ELF0.420.240.221.000.280.250.340.67
FCNCA0.500.310.290.281.000.380.350.45
BELFB0.440.280.260.250.381.000.400.57
ACLS0.590.280.310.340.350.401.000.56
Portfolio0.580.600.620.670.450.570.561.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Sep 23, 2016