PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
2017 btc+eth
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


BTC-USD 50%ETH-USD 50%CryptocurrencyCryptocurrency
PositionCategory/SectorWeight
BTC-USD
Bitcoin
50%
ETH-USD
Ethereum
50%

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in 2017 btc+eth, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Quarterly


-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-23.06%
9.39%
2017 btc+eth
Benchmark (^GSPC)
Portfolio components

The earliest data available for this chart is Aug 7, 2015, corresponding to the inception date of ETH-USD

Returns By Period


Year-To-Date1 month6 months1 year5 years (annualized)10 years (annualized)
^GSPC
S&P 500
18.10%1.42%9.39%26.58%13.42%10.88%
2017 btc+eth20.81%-5.68%-23.06%81.17%55.19%N/A
BTC-USD
Bitcoin
40.03%-0.50%-12.38%123.04%42.15%63.85%
ETH-USD
Ethereum
0.61%-12.21%-34.76%41.43%61.12%N/A

Monthly Returns

The table below presents the monthly returns of 2017 btc+eth, with color gradation from worst to best to easily spot seasonal factors. Returns are adjusted for dividends.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20240.40%45.05%12.88%-16.22%18.02%-7.93%-1.36%-15.14%20.81%
202336.20%0.61%18.34%2.89%-3.57%7.45%-4.04%-11.31%2.75%18.62%10.71%11.62%121.63%
2022-21.97%10.52%8.66%-16.99%-22.30%-41.17%37.62%-10.40%-9.80%11.96%-16.96%-5.73%-65.34%
202145.82%19.03%33.00%21.74%-15.23%-14.20%15.01%24.41%-10.12%41.44%0.56%-19.73%200.10%
202034.47%7.43%-33.38%44.96%10.34%-2.65%38.28%15.70%-13.47%17.56%50.03%34.09%390.71%
2019-13.62%18.97%5.00%22.48%62.62%17.77%-15.79%-11.95%-6.43%6.53%-17.41%-9.92%39.20%
20189.32%-15.04%-45.31%50.68%-16.04%-18.42%8.32%-20.72%-10.16%-9.94%-39.36%4.17%-76.99%
201717.43%36.22%136.12%41.15%135.10%21.45%-7.45%72.64%-13.33%25.37%53.36%49.90%5,975.37%
201666.91%135.03%72.90%-7.17%35.23%7.78%-6.00%-4.85%9.67%-0.98%-5.53%15.90%875.90%
2015-34.36%-12.61%28.34%7.41%10.96%-12.27%

Expense Ratio

2017 btc+eth has an expense ratio of 0.00%, indicating no management fees are charged. Below you can find the expense ratios of portfolio funds side-by-side and effortlessly compare their relative costs.


The portfolio doesn't hold funds that charge fees

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

The current rank of 2017 btc+eth is 4, indicating that it is in the bottom 4% of portfolios on our website in terms of risk-adjusted performance. This ranking is based on the combined values of the indicators listed below.


The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of 2017 btc+eth is 44
2017 btc+eth
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of 2017 btc+eth is 44Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of 2017 btc+eth is 44Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of 2017 btc+eth is 44Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of 2017 btc+eth is 33Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of 2017 btc+eth is 44Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance Indicators

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for positions. Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


2017 btc+eth
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for 2017 btc+eth, currently valued at 0.34, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.34
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for 2017 btc+eth, currently valued at 0.90, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.000.90
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for 2017 btc+eth, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market0.801.001.201.401.601.801.09
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for 2017 btc+eth, currently valued at 0.11, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.000.11
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for 2017 btc+eth, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.20
^GSPC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 1.96, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.96
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 2.65, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.65
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market0.801.001.201.401.601.801.35
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 1.77, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.001.77
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 10.43, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0010.43

Portfolio components
Sharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
BTC-USD
Bitcoin
0.721.361.140.343.16
ETH-USD
Ethereum
-0.040.441.040.02-0.11

Sharpe Ratio

The current 2017 btc+eth Sharpe ratio is 0.34. This value is calculated based on the past 1 year of trading data and takes into account price changes and dividends.

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.64 to 2.29, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio places it in the bottom 25%. This suggests that it may not be performing as well in terms of risk-adjusted returns compared to many other portfolios. The lower performance could be due to either lower returns, higher volatility, or a combination of both. This might indicate that the portfolio requires some fine-tuning. You can use the Portfolio Optimization tool to find an allocation that maximizes the Sharpe ratio.

Use the chart below to compare the Sharpe ratio of 2017 btc+eth with the selected benchmark, providing insights into the investment's historical performance in terms of risk-adjusted returns. Go to the Sharpe ratio tool for more fine-grained control over the calculation options.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.005.006.00AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
0.34
1.96
2017 btc+eth
Benchmark (^GSPC)
Portfolio components

Dividends

Dividend yield


2017 btc+eth doesn't pay dividends

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-32.65%
-0.60%
2017 btc+eth
Benchmark (^GSPC)
Portfolio components

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the 2017 btc+eth. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the 2017 btc+eth was 87.90%, occurring on Dec 15, 2018. Recovery took 743 trading sessions.

The current 2017 btc+eth drawdown is 32.65%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-87.9%Jan 14, 2018336Dec 15, 2018743Dec 27, 20201079
-76.38%Nov 9, 2021366Nov 9, 2022
-54.19%May 12, 202170Jul 20, 202192Oct 20, 2021162
-51.28%Aug 8, 201574Oct 20, 201589Jan 17, 2016163
-48.51%Jun 13, 201734Jul 16, 201727Aug 12, 201761

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The current 2017 btc+eth volatility is 14.84%, representing the average percentage change in the investments's value, either up or down over the past month. The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
14.84%
4.09%
2017 btc+eth
Benchmark (^GSPC)
Portfolio components

Diversification

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BTC-USDETH-USD
BTC-USD1.000.64
ETH-USD0.641.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Aug 8, 2015