PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZWB.TO vs. XSB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZWB.TO vs. XSB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB.TO) and iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF (XSB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZWB.TO achieves a 18.31% return, which is significantly higher than XSB.TO's 0.80% return. Over the past 10 years, ZWB.TO has outperformed XSB.TO with an annualized return of 12.43%, while XSB.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 1.93% annualized return.


ZWB.TO

1D
0.35%
1M
5.16%
YTD
18.31%
6M
20.90%
1Y
52.20%
3Y*
26.73%
5Y*
14.38%
10Y*
12.43%

XSB.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.22%
YTD
0.80%
6M
1.10%
1Y
2.95%
3Y*
4.78%
5Y*
1.98%
10Y*
1.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZWB.TO vs. XSB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZWB.TO
BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF
18.31%34.91%19.41%6.67%-11.00%30.81%1.68%14.32%-8.08%11.52%
XSB.TO
iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF
0.80%3.70%5.87%4.67%-4.04%-1.11%5.20%3.20%1.60%0.13%

Correlation

The correlation between ZWB.TO and XSB.TO is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2011

-0.09

The correlation between ZWB.TO and XSB.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZWB.TO vs. XSB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZWB.TO
ZWB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ZWB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZWB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZWB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ZWB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZWB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

XSB.TO
XSB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
XSB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
XSB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZWB.TO vs. XSB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB.TO) and iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF (XSB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZWB.TOXSB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.89

1.29

+0.60

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.71

2.01

+4.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

30.11

6.68

+23.42

ZWB.TO vs. XSB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZWB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.62, which is higher than the XSB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZWB.TO and XSB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZWB.TOXSB.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.62

1.49

+3.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.14

0.73

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.57

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.97

-0.22

Drawdowns

ZWB.TO vs. XSB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZWB.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.36%, which is greater than XSB.TO's maximum drawdown of -8.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWB.TO and XSB.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZWB.TOXSB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.36%

-8.65%

-30.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.82%

-1.47%

-6.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.05%

-1.47%

-12.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.26%

-6.99%

-18.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.36%

-8.65%

-30.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-0.34%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.56%

-0.79%

-4.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

0.44%

+1.30%

Volatility

ZWB.TO vs. XSB.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.89% compared to iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF (XSB.TO) at 0.75%. This indicates that ZWB.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZWB.TOXSB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.89%

0.75%

+3.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.91%

1.68%

+8.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.39%

1.99%

+9.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.64%

2.72%

+9.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.68%

3.40%

+12.28%

ZWB.TO vs. XSB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZWB.TO has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than XSB.TO's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZWB.TO vs. XSB.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZWB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, more than XSB.TO's 3.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XSB.TO
iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF
3.11%3.15%3.05%2.67%2.28%2.05%2.21%2.39%2.39%2.36%2.36%2.50%
ZWB.TO
BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF
4.93%5.38%6.66%7.62%7.30%5.46%5.80%5.53%5.59%4.80%5.04%5.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZWB.TO and XSB.TO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSB.TO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSB.TO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for ZWB.TO.

ZWB.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while XSB.TO is Canadian Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: BMO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for ZWB.TO and 0.10% for XSB.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZWB.TO and XSB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer