PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZTS vs. MAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ZTS vs. MAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) and Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZTS achieves a -36.81% return, which is significantly lower than MAR's 26.66% return. Over the past 10 years, ZTS has underperformed MAR with an annualized return of 6.09%, while MAR has yielded a comparatively higher 20.49% annualized return.


ZTS

1D
-0.78%
1M
-4.84%
YTD
-36.81%
6M
-32.72%
1Y
-52.96%
3Y*
-20.57%
5Y*
-14.04%
10Y*
6.09%

MAR

1D
-0.28%
1M
11.05%
YTD
26.66%
6M
36.53%
1Y
48.66%
3Y*
31.04%
5Y*
23.16%
10Y*
20.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZTS vs. MAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZTS
Zoetis Inc.
-36.81%-21.75%-16.63%35.91%-39.51%48.26%25.76%55.71%19.45%35.55%
MAR
Marriott International, Inc.
26.66%12.31%24.92%53.06%-9.34%25.26%-12.53%41.49%-19.05%66.24%

Correlation

The correlation between ZTS and MAR is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2013

0.32

Fundamentals

EPS

ZTS:

$6.04

MAR:

$12.66

PE Ratio

ZTS:

13.04

MAR:

30.92

PEG Ratio

ZTS:

1.46

MAR:

0.81

PS Ratio

ZTS:

3.63

MAR:

3.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

ZTS:

$9.51B

MAR:

$21.73B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ZTS:

$6.73B

MAR:

$1.31B

EBITDA (TTM)

ZTS:

$3.95B

MAR:

$3.81B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZTS vs. MAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZTS
ZTS Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
ZTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZTS Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
ZTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZTS Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

MAR
MAR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
MAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAR Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
MAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAR Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZTS vs. MAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) and Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZTSMARDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.65

1.32

-0.67

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.96

3.87

-4.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-2.06

9.70

-11.76

ZTS vs. MAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZTS Sharpe Ratio is -1.49, which is lower than the MAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZTS and MAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZTSMARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.49

1.87

-3.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.49

0.81

-1.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

0.63

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.47

-0.17

Drawdowns

ZTS vs. MAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZTS drawdown since its inception was -68.48%, smaller than the maximum MAR drawdown of -75.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTS and MAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZTSMARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.48%

-75.59%

+7.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.35%

-12.65%

-42.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.77%

-30.50%

-31.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.48%

-30.50%

-37.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.48%

-61.26%

-7.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-66.52%

-0.28%

-66.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.79%

-14.91%

+0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.22%

5.03%

+21.19%

Volatility

ZTS vs. MAR - Volatility Comparison

Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) has a higher volatility of 12.29% compared to Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) at 6.25%. This indicates that ZTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZTSMARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.29%

6.25%

+6.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.20%

19.86%

+11.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.61%

26.15%

+9.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.74%

28.82%

-0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.08%

32.89%

-5.81%

Dividends

ZTS vs. MAR - Dividend Comparison

ZTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than MAR's 0.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MAR
Marriott International, Inc.
0.70%0.85%0.86%0.87%0.67%0.00%0.36%1.22%1.44%0.95%1.39%1.42%
ZTS
Zoetis Inc.
2.61%1.59%1.06%0.76%0.89%0.41%0.48%0.50%0.59%0.58%0.71%0.69%

Financials

ZTS vs. MAR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Zoetis Inc. and Marriott International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20222023202420252026
2.26B
1.81B
(ZTS) Total Revenue
(MAR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ZTS and MAR have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZTS has higher volatility (12.29%) compared to MAR (6.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZTS dropped -68.48% vs MAR's -75.59%.

MAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs -1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZTS and MAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer