ZTS vs. LPLA
ZTS (Zoetis Inc.) and LPLA (LPL Financial Holdings Inc.) are both stocks. ZTS operates in Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic (Healthcare), while LPLA operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, ZTS returned 6.09%/yr vs 29.01%/yr for LPLA. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ZTS vs. LPLA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZTS achieves a -36.81% return, which is significantly lower than LPLA's -20.40% return. Over the past 10 years, ZTS has underperformed LPLA with an annualized return of 6.09%, while LPLA has yielded a comparatively higher 29.01% annualized return.
ZTS
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- -4.84%
- YTD
- -36.81%
- 6M
- -32.72%
- 1Y
- -52.96%
- 3Y*
- -20.57%
- 5Y*
- -14.04%
- 10Y*
- 6.09%
LPLA
- 1D
- -1.65%
- 1M
- -6.42%
- YTD
- -20.40%
- 6M
- -22.85%
- 1Y
- -26.79%
- 3Y*
- 12.01%
- 5Y*
- 15.99%
- 10Y*
- 29.01%
ZTS vs. LPLA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZTS Zoetis Inc. | -36.81% | -21.75% | -16.63% | 35.91% | -39.51% | 48.26% | 25.76% | 55.71% | 19.45% | 35.55% |
LPLA LPL Financial Holdings Inc. | -20.40% | 9.76% | 44.12% | 5.88% | 35.69% | 54.63% | 14.58% | 52.95% | 8.53% | 66.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZTS and LPLA is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2013 | 0.24 |
The correlation between ZTS and LPLA shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (3 years) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ZTS:
$33.29B
LPLA:
$22.82B
ZTS:
$6.04
LPLA:
$11.30
ZTS:
13.04
LPLA:
25.11
ZTS:
1.46
LPLA:
1.06
ZTS:
3.63
LPLA:
1.24
ZTS:
10.30
LPLA:
4.01
ZTS:
$9.51B
LPLA:
$18.26B
ZTS:
$6.73B
LPLA:
$7.58B
ZTS:
$3.95B
LPLA:
$2.23B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZTS vs. LPLA — Risk / Return Rank
ZTS
LPLA
ZTS vs. LPLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) and LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (LPLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZTS | LPLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.65 | 0.89 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.96 | -0.81 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.06 | -1.70 | -0.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZTS | LPLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.49 | -0.75 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.49 | 0.45 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | 0.76 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.47 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
ZTS vs. LPLA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZTS drawdown since its inception was -68.48%, roughly equal to the maximum LPLA drawdown of -69.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTS and LPLA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZTS | LPLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.48% | -69.32% | +0.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.35% | -33.12% | -22.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.77% | -33.18% | -28.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.48% | -33.18% | -35.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.48% | -60.34% | -8.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.52% | -28.63% | -37.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.79% | -13.91% | -0.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.22% | 15.84% | +10.38% |
Volatility
ZTS vs. LPLA - Volatility Comparison
Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) has a higher volatility of 12.29% compared to LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (LPLA) at 10.60%. This indicates that ZTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LPLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZTS | LPLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.29% | 10.60% | +1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.20% | 27.76% | +3.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.61% | 36.06% | -0.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.74% | 36.03% | -7.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.08% | 38.12% | -11.04% |
Dividends
ZTS vs. LPLA - Dividend Comparison
ZTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than LPLA's 0.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LPLA LPL Financial Holdings Inc. | 0.42% | 0.34% | 0.37% | 0.53% | 0.46% | 0.62% | 0.96% | 1.08% | 1.64% | 1.75% | 2.84% | 2.34% |
ZTS Zoetis Inc. | 2.61% | 1.59% | 1.06% | 0.76% | 0.89% | 0.41% | 0.48% | 0.50% | 0.59% | 0.58% | 0.71% | 0.69% |
Financials
ZTS vs. LPLA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Zoetis Inc. and LPL Financial Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ZTS vs. LPLA - Profitability Comparison
ZTS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zoetis Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.62B and revenue of 2.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.7%.
LPLA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LPL Financial Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.52B and revenue of 4.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 91.5%.
ZTS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zoetis Inc. reported an operating income of 853.00M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.7%.
LPLA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LPL Financial Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 4.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
ZTS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zoetis Inc. reported a net income of 601.00M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.
LPLA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LPL Financial Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 356.40M and revenue of 4.94B, resulting in a net margin of 7.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ZTS and LPLA have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZTS has higher volatility (12.29%) compared to LPLA (10.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZTS dropped -68.48% vs LPLA's -69.32%.
LPLA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.75 vs -1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZTS and LPLA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer