ZSP.TO vs. XLK
ZSP.TO (BMO S&P 500 Index ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZSP.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZSP.TO returned 16.03%/yr vs 26.18%/yr for XLK. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZSP.TO charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
ZSP.TO vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ZSP.TO is traded in CAD, while XLK is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLK values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZSP.TO achieves a 10.37% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 30.38% return. Over the past 10 years, ZSP.TO has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 16.03%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 26.18% annualized return.
ZSP.TO
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 2.27%
- YTD
- 10.37%
- 6M
- 9.38%
- 1Y
- 26.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.94%
- 5Y*
- 16.43%
- 10Y*
- 16.03%
XLK
- 1D
- 2.40%
- 1M
- 7.07%
- YTD
- 30.38%
- 6M
- 26.05%
- 1Y
- 58.52%
- 3Y*
- 33.20%
- 5Y*
- 25.75%
- 10Y*
- 26.18%
ZSP.TO vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZSP.TO BMO S&P 500 Index ETF | 10.37% | 12.36% | 35.07% | 23.30% | -12.68% | 27.54% | 15.61% | 24.69% | 3.28% | 13.60% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 30.42% | 18.92% | 31.93% | 52.31% | -23.15% | 34.68% | 40.21% | 43.68% | 6.59% | 25.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZSP.TO and XLK is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2012 | 0.69 |
The correlation between ZSP.TO and XLK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
ZSP.TO vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZSP.TO
XLK
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
ZSP.TO
XLK
Financial Services
ZSP.TO
XLK
-
Communication Services
ZSP.TO
XLK
-
Consumer Cyclical
ZSP.TO
XLK
-
Healthcare
ZSP.TO
XLK
-
Industrials
ZSP.TO
XLK
Consumer Defensive
ZSP.TO
XLK
-
Energy
ZSP.TO
XLK
Utilities
ZSP.TO
XLK
-
Real Estate
ZSP.TO
XLK
-
Basic Materials
ZSP.TO
XLK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZSP.TO vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
ZSP.TO
XLK
ZSP.TO vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZSP.TO | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.43 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | 3.64 | -0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.81 | 10.89 | +0.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZSP.TO | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | 2.65 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.10 | 1.00 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 | 1.03 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.14 | 0.69 | +0.45 |
Drawdowns
ZSP.TO vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZSP.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.94%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -38.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSP.TO and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZSP.TO | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.94% | -38.68% | +11.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.61% | -16.16% | +7.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.95% | -26.35% | +7.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.25% | -29.64% | +7.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.94% | -29.64% | +2.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.03% | -6.41% | +4.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.34% | -7.57% | +4.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.29% | 5.39% | -3.10% |
Volatility
ZSP.TO vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO) is 3.87%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 10.45%. This indicates that ZSP.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZSP.TO | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.87% | 10.45% | -6.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.00% | 18.52% | -9.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.71% | 22.22% | -10.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.00% | 25.83% | -10.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.38% | 25.53% | -9.15% |
ZSP.TO vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZSP.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ZSP.TO vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
ZSP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, more than XLK's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.41% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
ZSP.TO BMO S&P 500 Index ETF | 0.76% | 0.82% | 0.94% | 1.33% | 1.44% | 1.15% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.68% | 1.68% | 2.23% | 1.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZSP.TO and XLK have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for ZSP.TO.
ZSP.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while XLK is Technology Equities. ZSP.TO tracks S&P 500 Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ZSP.TO and 0.08% for XLK.
Find the right allocation for ZSP.TO and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer