PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZRE.TO vs. ZCM.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZRE.TO vs. ZCM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF (ZRE.TO) and BMO Mid Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZCM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZRE.TO achieves a 10.13% return, which is significantly higher than ZCM.TO's 1.18% return. Over the past 10 years, ZRE.TO has outperformed ZCM.TO with an annualized return of 6.88%, while ZCM.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 2.93% annualized return.


ZRE.TO

1D
-0.42%
1M
0.29%
YTD
10.13%
6M
12.31%
1Y
11.54%
3Y*
8.50%
5Y*
3.17%
10Y*
6.88%

ZCM.TO

1D
-0.32%
1M
0.11%
YTD
1.18%
6M
2.05%
1Y
4.95%
3Y*
6.91%
5Y*
2.18%
10Y*
2.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZRE.TO vs. ZCM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZRE.TO
BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF
10.13%11.28%2.89%0.91%-17.74%34.04%-7.72%25.86%3.36%14.36%
ZCM.TO
BMO Mid Corporate Bond Index ETF
1.18%5.06%8.07%7.97%-10.18%-2.08%10.35%8.60%0.58%2.29%

Correlation

The correlation between ZRE.TO and ZCM.TO is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2010

0.11

Over the past year, ZRE.TO and ZCM.TO have become more correlated (0.31) than their long-term average of 0.11, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZRE.TO vs. ZCM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZRE.TO
ZRE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
ZRE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZRE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZRE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
ZRE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZRE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

ZCM.TO
ZCM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
ZCM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZCM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZCM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
ZCM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZCM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZRE.TO vs. ZCM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF (ZRE.TO) and BMO Mid Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZCM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZRE.TOZCM.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.21

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

1.61

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.39

4.64

-0.26

ZRE.TO vs. ZCM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZRE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is comparable to the ZCM.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZRE.TO and ZCM.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZRE.TOZCM.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

1.11

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.36

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.34

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.55

-0.03

Drawdowns

ZRE.TO vs. ZCM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZRE.TO drawdown since its inception was -46.29%, which is greater than ZCM.TO's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZRE.TO and ZCM.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZRE.TOZCM.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.29%

-26.06%

-20.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.07%

-3.08%

-3.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.14%

-4.02%

-13.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.44%

-15.81%

-16.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.29%

-26.06%

-20.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-1.13%

+0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.70%

-2.61%

-5.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

1.07%

+1.57%

Volatility

ZRE.TO vs. ZCM.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF (ZRE.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.95% compared to BMO Mid Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZCM.TO) at 1.80%. This indicates that ZRE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZCM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZRE.TOZCM.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.95%

1.80%

+1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.41%

3.67%

+4.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.14%

4.48%

+6.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.53%

6.10%

+9.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.67%

8.77%

+8.90%

ZRE.TO vs. ZCM.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZRE.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than ZCM.TO's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZRE.TO vs. ZCM.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZRE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than ZCM.TO's 4.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ZCM.TO
BMO Mid Corporate Bond Index ETF
4.28%4.03%3.85%3.94%3.81%3.30%3.13%3.34%3.23%3.04%3.18%3.43%
ZRE.TO
BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF
4.43%4.96%5.26%5.14%4.97%3.87%5.01%4.17%4.95%5.05%5.46%6.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZRE.TO and ZCM.TO have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZCM.TO is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZCM.TO is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for ZRE.TO.

ZRE.TO is categorized as REIT, while ZCM.TO is Corporate Bonds. ZRE.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada REIT Index, while ZCM.TO tracks FTSE Canada Mid Term Corporate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for ZRE.TO and 0.33% for ZCM.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZRE.TO and ZCM.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer