PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZMMK.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZMMK.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO) and CT Real Estate Investment Trust (CRT-UN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZMMK.TO achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than CRT-UN.TO's 11.59% return.


ZMMK.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.19%
YTD
0.99%
6M
1.15%
1Y
2.48%
3Y*
3.85%
5Y*
10Y*

CRT-UN.TO

1D
-0.11%
1M
1.42%
YTD
11.59%
6M
15.18%
1Y
16.30%
3Y*
12.39%
5Y*
7.05%
10Y*
7.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZMMK.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ZMMK.TO
BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series
0.99%2.77%4.94%4.86%1.99%0.04%
CRT-UN.TO
CT Real Estate Investment Trust
11.59%20.98%3.91%-0.26%-5.16%3.58%

Correlation

The correlation between ZMMK.TO and CRT-UN.TO is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2021

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZMMK.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZMMK.TO
ZMMK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
ZMMK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZMMK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZMMK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
ZMMK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZMMK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

CRT-UN.TO
CRT-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
CRT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRT-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRT-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
CRT-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRT-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZMMK.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO) and CT Real Estate Investment Trust (CRT-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZMMK.TOCRT-UN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+7.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+20.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

5.37

1.22

+4.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

62.17

2.63

+59.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

353.74

6.86

+346.88

ZMMK.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZMMK.TO Sharpe Ratio is 9.19, which is higher than the CRT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZMMK.TO and CRT-UN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZMMK.TOCRT-UN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.19

1.29

+7.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

10.21

0.54

+9.67

Drawdowns

ZMMK.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZMMK.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.16%, smaller than the maximum CRT-UN.TO drawdown of -45.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZMMK.TO and CRT-UN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZMMK.TOCRT-UN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.16%

-45.88%

+45.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.04%

-6.24%

+6.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.08%

-17.38%

+17.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.84%

+0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.00%

-6.26%

+6.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

2.38%

-2.37%

Volatility

ZMMK.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO) is 0.07%, while CT Real Estate Investment Trust (CRT-UN.TO) has a volatility of 2.78%. This indicates that ZMMK.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRT-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZMMK.TOCRT-UN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.07%

2.78%

-2.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.19%

9.36%

-9.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27%

12.74%

-12.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.34%

17.64%

-17.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.34%

20.22%

-19.88%

Dividends

ZMMK.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZMMK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than CRT-UN.TO's 5.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRT-UN.TO
CT Real Estate Investment Trust
5.35%5.77%6.40%6.04%5.48%4.76%5.08%4.71%6.34%4.84%4.54%5.11%
ZMMK.TO
BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series
2.53%3.02%4.66%4.98%1.95%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZMMK.TO and CRT-UN.TO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZMMK.TO and CRT-UN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer