PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZDY.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZDY.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD) (ZDY.TO) and CT Real Estate Investment Trust (CRT-UN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZDY.TO achieves a 16.12% return, which is significantly higher than CRT-UN.TO's 11.59% return. Over the past 10 years, ZDY.TO has outperformed CRT-UN.TO with an annualized return of 10.44%, while CRT-UN.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 7.63% annualized return.


ZDY.TO

1D
-0.03%
1M
4.72%
YTD
16.12%
6M
4.01%
1Y
17.88%
3Y*
15.55%
5Y*
12.01%
10Y*
10.44%

CRT-UN.TO

1D
-0.11%
1M
1.42%
YTD
11.59%
6M
15.18%
1Y
16.30%
3Y*
12.39%
5Y*
7.05%
10Y*
7.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZDY.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZDY.TO
BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD)
16.12%-0.87%26.24%4.58%1.64%22.92%-5.18%16.94%3.23%6.74%
CRT-UN.TO
CT Real Estate Investment Trust
11.59%20.98%3.91%-0.26%-5.16%16.12%2.73%47.59%-15.85%1.45%

Correlation

The correlation between ZDY.TO and CRT-UN.TO is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.26

The correlation between ZDY.TO and CRT-UN.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZDY.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZDY.TO
ZDY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
ZDY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZDY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZDY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ZDY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZDY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

CRT-UN.TO
CRT-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
CRT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRT-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRT-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
CRT-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRT-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZDY.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD) (ZDY.TO) and CT Real Estate Investment Trust (CRT-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZDY.TOCRT-UN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.22

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

2.63

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.00

6.86

-2.86

ZDY.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZDY.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the CRT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZDY.TO and CRT-UN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZDY.TOCRT-UN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

1.29

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

0.40

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.38

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.54

+0.35

Drawdowns

ZDY.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZDY.TO drawdown since its inception was -32.99%, smaller than the maximum CRT-UN.TO drawdown of -45.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZDY.TO and CRT-UN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZDY.TOCRT-UN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.99%

-45.88%

+12.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.53%

-6.24%

-5.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.33%

-17.38%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.33%

-24.70%

+9.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.99%

-45.88%

+12.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.92%

-0.84%

-1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.42%

-6.26%

+2.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.48%

2.38%

+2.10%

Volatility

ZDY.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD) (ZDY.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.05% compared to CT Real Estate Investment Trust (CRT-UN.TO) at 2.78%. This indicates that ZDY.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRT-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZDY.TOCRT-UN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.05%

2.78%

+2.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.12%

9.36%

+1.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.86%

12.74%

+0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.41%

17.64%

-5.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.29%

20.22%

-4.93%

Dividends

ZDY.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZDY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than CRT-UN.TO's 5.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRT-UN.TO
CT Real Estate Investment Trust
5.35%5.77%6.40%6.04%5.48%4.76%5.08%4.71%6.34%4.84%4.54%5.11%
ZDY.TO
BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD)
1.52%1.80%1.97%2.43%2.48%2.33%3.65%3.02%2.80%2.63%2.46%2.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZDY.TO and CRT-UN.TO have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZDY.TO and CRT-UN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer