PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZBRA vs. FANUY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ZBRA vs. FANUY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) and Fanuc Corporation (FANUY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZBRA achieves a -4.03% return, which is significantly lower than FANUY's 17.51% return. Over the past 10 years, ZBRA has outperformed FANUY with an annualized return of 15.32%, while FANUY has yielded a comparatively lower -0.78% annualized return.


ZBRA

1D
0.40%
1M
3.10%
YTD
-4.03%
6M
-11.86%
1Y
-21.10%
3Y*
-5.33%
5Y*
-14.34%
10Y*
15.32%

FANUY

1D
1.02%
1M
-6.04%
YTD
17.51%
6M
20.94%
1Y
76.68%
3Y*
8.78%
5Y*
-0.10%
10Y*
-0.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZBRA vs. FANUY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZBRA
Zebra Technologies Corporation
-4.03%-37.13%41.30%6.60%-56.92%54.87%50.46%60.42%53.40%21.04%
FANUY
Fanuc Corporation
17.51%51.15%-9.96%-1.61%-30.16%-13.77%34.04%22.31%-37.35%44.38%

Correlation

The correlation between ZBRA and FANUY is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2008

0.32

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ZBRA:

$11.80B

FANUY:

$42.69B

EPS

ZBRA:

$8.16

FANUY:

$90.48

PE Ratio

ZBRA:

28.56

FANUY:

0.25

PS Ratio

ZBRA:

2.14

FANUY:

0.05

PB Ratio

ZBRA:

3.40

FANUY:

0.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

ZBRA:

$5.58B

FANUY:

$869.72B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ZBRA:

$2.65B

FANUY:

$332.99B

EBITDA (TTM)

ZBRA:

$1.02B

FANUY:

$258.17B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZBRA vs. FANUY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZBRA
ZBRA Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
ZBRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZBRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZBRA Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
ZBRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZBRA Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

FANUY
FANUY Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FANUY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FANUY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FANUY Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FANUY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FANUY Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZBRA vs. FANUY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) and Fanuc Corporation (FANUY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZBRAFANUYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.30

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.51

3.08

-3.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.88

9.41

-10.30

ZBRA vs. FANUY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZBRA Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the FANUY Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZBRA and FANUY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZBRAFANUYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.51

1.72

-2.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.36

-0.00

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

-0.02

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

-0.06

+0.30

Drawdowns

ZBRA vs. FANUY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZBRA drawdown since its inception was -73.42%, smaller than the maximum FANUY drawdown of -79.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZBRA and FANUY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZBRAFANUYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.42%

-79.98%

+6.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.62%

-24.99%

-16.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.67%

-40.05%

-12.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.78%

-55.55%

-12.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.78%

-64.73%

-3.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.08%

-58.01%

-4.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.69%

-53.58%

+25.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.98%

8.17%

+15.81%

Volatility

ZBRA vs. FANUY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) is 16.92%, while Fanuc Corporation (FANUY) has a volatility of 19.03%. This indicates that ZBRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FANUY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZBRAFANUYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.92%

19.03%

-2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.20%

34.27%

-4.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.55%

44.87%

-3.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.33%

32.97%

+7.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.31%

33.79%

+5.52%

Dividends

ZBRA vs. FANUY - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZBRA nor FANUY has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FANUY
Fanuc Corporation
0.00%0.89%1.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.66%
ZBRA
Zebra Technologies Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ZBRA vs. FANUY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Zebra Technologies Corporation and Fanuc Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B20222023202420252026
1.50B
238.83B
(ZBRA) Total Revenue
(FANUY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ZBRA vs. FANUY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Zebra Technologies Corporation and Fanuc Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
49.6%
40.2%
Portfolio components
ZBRA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zebra Technologies Corporation reported a gross profit of 742.00M and revenue of 1.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.6%.

FANUY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fanuc Corporation reported a gross profit of 95.97B and revenue of 238.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.2%.

ZBRA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zebra Technologies Corporation reported an operating income of 215.00M and revenue of 1.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.

FANUY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fanuc Corporation reported an operating income of 57.09B and revenue of 238.83B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.9%.

ZBRA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zebra Technologies Corporation reported a net income of 135.00M and revenue of 1.50B, resulting in a net margin of 9.0%.

FANUY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fanuc Corporation reported a net income of 50.59B and revenue of 238.83B, resulting in a net margin of 21.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ZBRA and FANUY have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FANUY has higher volatility (19.03%) compared to ZBRA (16.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZBRA dropped -73.42% vs FANUY's -79.98%.

FANUY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZBRA and FANUY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer