YUMC vs. LI
YUMC (Yum China Holdings, Inc.) and LI (Li Auto Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — YUMC in Restaurants, LI in Auto Manufacturers. Over the past 5 years, YUMC returned -7.86%/yr vs -11.93%/yr for LI. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
YUMC vs. LI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YUMC achieves a -10.25% return, which is significantly higher than LI's -14.18% return.
YUMC
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- -9.15%
- YTD
- -10.25%
- 6M
- -6.88%
- 1Y
- 0.49%
- 3Y*
- -9.20%
- 5Y*
- -7.86%
- 10Y*
- —
LI
- 1D
- 2.32%
- 1M
- -19.28%
- YTD
- -14.18%
- 6M
- -19.05%
- 1Y
- -50.78%
- 3Y*
- -22.96%
- 5Y*
- -11.93%
- 10Y*
- —
YUMC vs. LI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YUMC Yum China Holdings, Inc. | -10.25% | 1.18% | 15.41% | -21.60% | 10.75% | -11.99% | 12.72% |
LI Li Auto Inc. | -14.18% | -29.43% | -35.91% | 83.48% | -36.45% | 11.34% | 75.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between YUMC and LI is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2020 | 0.38 |
The correlation between YUMC and LI shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
YUMC:
$14.94B
LI:
$14.73B
YUMC:
$2.60
LI:
-$1.74
YUMC:
1.27
LI:
0.14
YUMC:
2.75
LI:
0.21
YUMC:
$12.09B
LI:
$108.98B
YUMC:
$1.47B
LI:
$17.42B
YUMC:
$1.71B
LI:
-$2.83B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YUMC vs. LI — Risk / Return Rank
YUMC
LI
YUMC vs. LI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) and Li Auto Inc. (LI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YUMC | LI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 0.77 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.02 | -0.92 | +0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.05 | -1.38 | +1.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YUMC | LI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 | -1.27 | +1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.21 | -0.19 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | -0.03 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
YUMC vs. LI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YUMC drawdown since its inception was -56.49%, smaller than the maximum LI drawdown of -69.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YUMC and LI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YUMC | LI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.49% | -69.56% | +13.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.06% | -55.35% | +29.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.42% | -69.56% | +18.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.45% | -69.56% | +13.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.37% | -68.85% | +34.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.36% | -39.88% | +20.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.35% | 36.80% | -26.45% |
Volatility
YUMC vs. LI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) is 5.08%, while Li Auto Inc. (LI) has a volatility of 17.56%. This indicates that YUMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YUMC | LI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.08% | 17.56% | -12.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.77% | 28.48% | -9.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.43% | 40.22% | -14.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.20% | 63.55% | -26.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.39% | 68.35% | -32.96% |
Dividends
YUMC vs. LI - Dividend Comparison
YUMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, while LI has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LI Li Auto Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YUMC Yum China Holdings, Inc. | 2.50% | 2.01% | 1.33% | 1.23% | 0.88% | 0.96% | 0.42% | 1.00% | 1.25% | 0.25% |
Financials
YUMC vs. LI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Yum China Holdings, Inc. and Li Auto Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
YUMC vs. LI - Profitability Comparison
YUMC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Yum China Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
LI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Li Auto Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.80B and revenue of 22.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.9%.
YUMC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Yum China Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 447.00M and revenue of 3.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.7%.
LI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Li Auto Inc. reported an operating income of -2.95B and revenue of 22.84B, resulting in an operating margin of -12.9%.
YUMC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Yum China Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 309.00M and revenue of 3.27B, resulting in a net margin of 9.5%.
LI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Li Auto Inc. reported a net income of -2.28B and revenue of 22.84B, resulting in a net margin of -10.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
YUMC and LI have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LI has higher volatility (17.56%) compared to YUMC (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YUMC dropped -56.49% vs LI's -69.56%.
YUMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.02 vs -1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YUMC and LI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer