PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YUM vs. DHR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

YUM vs. DHR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM) and Danaher Corporation (DHR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YUM achieves a -1.66% return, which is significantly higher than DHR's -19.66% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with YUM having a 11.56% annualized return and DHR not far behind at 11.19%.


YUM

1D
-2.32%
1M
-2.54%
YTD
-1.66%
6M
4.38%
1Y
3.71%
3Y*
5.37%
5Y*
6.61%
10Y*
11.56%

DHR

1D
-0.42%
1M
7.23%
YTD
-19.66%
6M
-17.95%
1Y
-5.73%
3Y*
-3.67%
5Y*
-2.52%
10Y*
11.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YUM vs. DHR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
YUM
YUM! Brands, Inc.
-1.66%14.94%4.72%3.93%-5.99%30.05%9.85%11.41%14.61%31.09%
DHR
Danaher Corporation
-19.66%0.35%-0.35%-1.22%-19.02%48.57%45.34%49.55%11.80%20.01%

Correlation

The correlation between YUM and DHR is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 1997

0.38

The correlation between YUM and DHR shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

YUM:

$41.12B

DHR:

$130.53B

EPS

YUM:

$6.21

DHR:

$5.17

PE Ratio

YUM:

23.72

DHR:

35.51

PS Ratio

YUM:

4.86

DHR:

5.29

Total Revenue (TTM)

YUM:

$8.49B

DHR:

$24.78B

Gross Profit (TTM)

YUM:

$3.88B

DHR:

$15.04B

EBITDA (TTM)

YUM:

$2.83B

DHR:

$6.69B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YUM vs. DHR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YUM
YUM Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
YUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
YUM Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
YUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
YUM Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

DHR
DHR Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
DHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHR Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
DHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHR Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YUM vs. DHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM) and Danaher Corporation (DHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YUMDHRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

0.99

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

-0.17

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.73

-0.42

+1.16

YUM vs. DHR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YUM Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is higher than the DHR Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YUM and DHR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YUMDHRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

-0.21

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

-0.09

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.44

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.65

-0.16

Drawdowns

YUM vs. DHR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YUM drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, which is greater than DHR's maximum drawdown of -45.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YUM and DHR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YUMDHRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.69%

-45.80%

-21.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.41%

-32.97%

+20.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.10%

-41.72%

+25.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.10%

-43.81%

+20.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.17%

-43.81%

-8.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.93%

-36.31%

+24.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.38%

-10.21%

-2.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.07%

13.51%

-8.44%

Volatility

YUM vs. DHR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM) is 6.38%, while Danaher Corporation (DHR) has a volatility of 9.24%. This indicates that YUM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YUMDHRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.38%

9.24%

-2.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.94%

19.43%

-4.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.80%

28.08%

-6.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.43%

28.00%

-7.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.74%

25.53%

-2.79%

Dividends

YUM vs. DHR - Dividend Comparison

YUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, more than DHR's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHR
Danaher Corporation
0.74%0.56%0.47%12.64%0.38%0.26%0.32%0.44%0.62%0.60%32.55%0.58%
YUM
YUM! Brands, Inc.
1.98%1.88%2.00%1.85%1.78%1.44%1.73%1.67%1.57%1.47%41.26%2.31%

Financials

YUM vs. DHR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between YUM! Brands, Inc. and Danaher Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
2.06B
5.95B
(YUM) Total Revenue
(DHR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

YUM vs. DHR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between YUM! Brands, Inc. and Danaher Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%20222023202420252026
44.7%
60.3%
Portfolio components
YUM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, YUM! Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 920.00M and revenue of 2.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.7%.

DHR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaher Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.59B and revenue of 5.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.3%.

YUM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, YUM! Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of 644.00M and revenue of 2.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.3%.

DHR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaher Corporation reported an operating income of 1.34B and revenue of 5.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.6%.

YUM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, YUM! Brands, Inc. reported a net income of 432.00M and revenue of 2.06B, resulting in a net margin of 21.0%.

DHR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaher Corporation reported a net income of 1.03B and revenue of 5.95B, resulting in a net margin of 17.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


YUM and DHR have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DHR has higher volatility (9.24%) compared to YUM (6.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YUM dropped -67.69% vs DHR's -45.80%.

YUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.17 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YUM and DHR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer