YBTC vs. GLDY

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

YBTC (Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF) and GLDY (Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YBTC is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Roundhill, while GLDY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Defiance. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, YBTC returned -36.91% vs 11.50% for GLDY. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. YBTC charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for GLDY.

Performance

YBTC vs. GLDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) and Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YBTC achieves a -26.04% return, which is significantly lower than GLDY's -4.78% return.

YBTC

• 1D: 5.52%
• 1M: -20.34%
• YTD: -26.04%
• 6M: -27.27%
• 1Y: -36.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GLDY

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: -6.85%
• YTD: -4.78%
• 6M: -2.80%
• 1Y: 11.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YBTC vs. GLDY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF	-26.04%	0.37%
GLDY Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF	-4.78%	15.40%

Correlation

The correlation between YBTC and GLDY is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025	0.14

Return for Risk

YBTC vs. GLDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YBTC

YBTC Risk / Return Rank: 2
YBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
YBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
YBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
YBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
YBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

GLDY

GLDY Risk / Return Rank: 19
GLDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
GLDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
GLDY Omega Ratio Rank: 22
GLDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
GLDY Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YBTC vs. GLDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) and Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	YBTC	GLDY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.93	0.57	-1.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.25	0.78	-2.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	1.13	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.76	0.74	-1.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.41	1.98	-3.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

YBTC vs. GLDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YBTC Sharpe Ratio is -0.93, which is lower than the GLDY Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YBTC and GLDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	YBTC	GLDY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.93	0.57	-1.50
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	0.42	-0.30

Drawdowns

YBTC vs. GLDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YBTC drawdown since its inception was -48.82%, which is greater than GLDY's maximum drawdown of -15.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBTC and GLDY.

Drawdown Indicators

	YBTC	GLDY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.82%	-15.57%	-33.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-48.82%	-15.57%	-33.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-45.99%	-15.33%	-30.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.06%	-4.02%	-9.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.19%	5.83%	+20.36%

Volatility

YBTC vs. GLDY - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) has a higher volatility of 11.99% compared to Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY) at 4.95%. This indicates that YBTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	YBTC	GLDY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.99%	4.95%	+7.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.26%	18.57%	+13.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.93%	20.14%	+19.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.09%	19.71%	+21.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.09%	19.71%	+21.38%

YBTC vs. GLDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

YBTC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than GLDY's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

YBTC vs. GLDY - Dividend Comparison

YBTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 88.91%, more than GLDY's 48.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GLDY Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF	48.51%	37.38%	0.00%
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF	88.91%	76.04%	44.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YBTC and GLDY in my portfolio?

YBTC and GLDY have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, YBTC or GLDY?

YBTC has higher volatility (11.99%) compared to GLDY (4.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YBTC dropped -48.82% vs GLDY's -15.57%.

Which ETF is better, YBTC or GLDY?

On 1-year performance, GLDY leads with 11.50% vs -36.91% for YBTC. On fees, YBTC is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, GLDY has been the lower-risk option at 4.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, YBTC or GLDY?

Over the 1-year period, GLDY has performed better with a 11.50% return vs -36.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, YBTC or GLDY?

YBTC is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GLDY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, YBTC or GLDY?

YBTC has the higher dividend yield at 88.91%, compared with 48.51% for GLDY.

What is the main difference between YBTC and GLDY?

YBTC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while GLDY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for YBTC and 0.99% for GLDY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.