PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XYLD vs. VIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XYLD vs. VIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XYLD achieves a 4.47% return, which is significantly lower than VIG's 6.58% return. Over the past 10 years, XYLD has underperformed VIG with an annualized return of 8.23%, while VIG has yielded a comparatively higher 13.05% annualized return.


XYLD

1D
0.27%
1M
0.88%
YTD
4.47%
6M
5.83%
1Y
16.60%
3Y*
10.96%
5Y*
7.62%
10Y*
8.23%

VIG

1D
0.03%
1M
2.32%
YTD
6.58%
6M
6.47%
1Y
18.31%
3Y*
16.04%
5Y*
10.62%
10Y*
13.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XYLD vs. VIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
4.47%8.02%19.49%11.10%-12.05%19.59%-0.56%21.41%-6.09%16.49%
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
6.58%14.17%16.99%14.51%-9.80%23.76%15.43%29.62%-2.08%22.22%

Correlation

The correlation between XYLD and VIG is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2013

0.75

The correlation between XYLD and VIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

XYLD vs. VIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XYLD
VIG

Technology

35.6%
26.2%

Financial Services

11.8%
20.6%

Communication Services

11.2%
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
4.7%

Healthcare

8.5%
16.5%

Industrials

8.3%
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
10.1%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
3.2%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%
3.5%

Technology

XYLD
35.6%
VIG
26.2%

Financial Services

XYLD
11.8%
VIG
20.6%

Communication Services

XYLD
11.2%
VIG
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

XYLD
10.2%
VIG
4.7%

Healthcare

XYLD
8.5%
VIG
16.5%

Industrials

XYLD
8.3%
VIG
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

XYLD
4.9%
VIG
10.1%

Energy

XYLD
3.5%
VIG
3.5%

Utilities

XYLD
2.3%
VIG
3.2%

Real Estate

XYLD
1.9%
VIG

-

Basic Materials

XYLD
1.8%
VIG
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XYLD vs. VIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XYLD
XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

VIG
VIG Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIG Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIG Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XYLD vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XYLDVIGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.33

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

2.33

+0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.73

9.37

+7.36

XYLD vs. VIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the VIG Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XYLD and VIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XYLDVIGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

1.82

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.75

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.82

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.60

0.00

Drawdowns

XYLD vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XYLD drawdown since its inception was -33.46%, smaller than the maximum VIG drawdown of -46.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLD and VIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XYLDVIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.46%

-46.81%

+13.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.29%

-7.91%

+2.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.53%

-14.95%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.66%

-20.39%

+1.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.46%

-31.72%

-1.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-1.34%

+0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-5.51%

+1.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

1.96%

-0.97%

Volatility

XYLD vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) is 1.33%, while Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) has a volatility of 2.42%. This indicates that XYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XYLDVIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.33%

2.42%

-1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.46%

7.68%

-2.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.60%

10.10%

-3.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.23%

14.24%

-3.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.21%

16.06%

-1.85%

XYLD vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VIG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

XYLD vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison

XYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.57%, more than VIG's 1.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
1.48%1.62%1.73%1.88%1.96%1.55%1.63%1.71%2.08%1.88%2.14%2.34%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
10.57%10.51%11.54%10.51%13.43%9.07%7.93%5.76%7.12%5.18%3.23%4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


XYLD and VIG have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VIG has higher volatility (2.42%) compared to XYLD (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XYLD dropped -33.46% vs VIG's -46.81%.

On 10-year performance, VIG leads with 13.05% vs 8.23% for XYLD. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, XYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VIG has performed better with a 13.05% return vs 8.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XYLD.

XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.57%, compared with 1.48% for VIG.

XYLD is categorized as Derivative Income, while VIG is Dividend. XYLD tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index, while VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XYLD and 0.04% for VIG.

XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XYLD and VIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer