XSTC.L vs. EQQQ.L
XSTC.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D) and EQQQ.L (Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSTC.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while EQQQ.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSTC.L returned 23.34%/yr vs 18.12%/yr for EQQQ.L. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XSTC.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EQQQ.L.
Performance
XSTC.L vs. EQQQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSTC.L achieves a 20.18% return, which is significantly higher than EQQQ.L's 17.33% return.
XSTC.L
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 7.02%
- YTD
- 20.18%
- 6M
- 17.03%
- 1Y
- 48.37%
- 3Y*
- 30.42%
- 5Y*
- 23.34%
- 10Y*
- —
EQQQ.L
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 3.83%
- YTD
- 17.33%
- 6M
- 15.28%
- 1Y
- 38.00%
- 3Y*
- 24.64%
- 5Y*
- 18.12%
- 10Y*
- 22.24%
XSTC.L vs. EQQQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D | 20.18% | 14.31% | 39.50% | 48.82% | -22.54% | 33.47% | 41.54% | 43.20% | 3.21% |
EQQQ.L Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF | 17.33% | 11.54% | 28.55% | 47.79% | -25.54% | 29.59% | 43.32% | 33.69% | 3.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSTC.L and EQQQ.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2018 | 0.96 |
The correlation between XSTC.L and EQQQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
XSTC.L vs. EQQQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSTC.L
EQQQ.L
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Energy
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XSTC.L
EQQQ.L
Industrials
XSTC.L
EQQQ.L
Communication Services
XSTC.L
EQQQ.L
Energy
XSTC.L
EQQQ.L
Financial Services
XSTC.L
EQQQ.L
Basic Materials
XSTC.L
-
EQQQ.L
Consumer Cyclical
XSTC.L
-
EQQQ.L
Consumer Defensive
XSTC.L
-
EQQQ.L
Healthcare
XSTC.L
-
EQQQ.L
Real Estate
XSTC.L
-
EQQQ.L
Utilities
XSTC.L
-
EQQQ.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSTC.L vs. EQQQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
XSTC.L
EQQQ.L
XSTC.L vs. EQQQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSTC.L | EQQQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.45 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | 3.45 | -0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.05 | 10.14 | -3.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSTC.L | EQQQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 2.55 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.05 | 0.95 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | 0.11 | +1.01 |
Drawdowns
XSTC.L vs. EQQQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSTC.L drawdown since its inception was -29.30%, smaller than the maximum EQQQ.L drawdown of -65.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSTC.L and EQQQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSTC.L | EQQQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.30% | -65.36% | +36.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.49% | -10.97% | -6.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.30% | -24.09% | -5.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.30% | -27.76% | -1.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.18% | -2.72% | -2.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.29% | -12.51% | +6.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.84% | 3.74% | +3.10% |
Volatility
XSTC.L vs. EQQQ.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) has a higher volatility of 7.59% compared to Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) at 4.63%. This indicates that XSTC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQQQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSTC.L | EQQQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.59% | 4.63% | +2.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.66% | 10.51% | +4.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.88% | 14.87% | +5.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.24% | 19.16% | +3.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.41% | 19.36% | +3.05% |
XSTC.L vs. EQQQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSTC.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than EQQQ.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSTC.L vs. EQQQ.L - Dividend Comparison
XSTC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, more than EQQQ.L's 0.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQQQ.L Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF | 0.23% | 0.29% | 0.38% | 0.39% | 0.56% | 0.25% | 0.41% | 0.56% | 0.63% | 0.67% | 0.77% | 0.72% |
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D | 0.26% | 0.33% | 0.37% | 0.53% | 1.08% | 0.53% | 0.63% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, XSTC.L and EQQQ.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XSTC.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSTC.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EQQQ.L.
XSTC.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while EQQQ.L is Nasdaq-100. XSTC.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while EQQQ.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XSTC.L and 0.30% for EQQQ.L.
Find the right allocation for XSTC.L and EQQQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer