XSTC.L vs. ANXG.L
XSTC.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D) and ANXG.L (Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD) are both exchange-traded funds - XSTC.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while ANXG.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSTC.L returned 23.34%/yr vs 18.36%/yr for ANXG.L. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XSTC.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for ANXG.L.
Performance
XSTC.L vs. ANXG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSTC.L achieves a 20.18% return, which is significantly higher than ANXG.L's 17.42% return.
XSTC.L
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 7.02%
- YTD
- 20.18%
- 6M
- 17.03%
- 1Y
- 48.37%
- 3Y*
- 30.42%
- 5Y*
- 23.34%
- 10Y*
- —
ANXG.L
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 3.84%
- YTD
- 17.42%
- 6M
- 15.28%
- 1Y
- 38.24%
- 3Y*
- 24.81%
- 5Y*
- 18.36%
- 10Y*
- 18.08%
XSTC.L vs. ANXG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D | 20.18% | 14.31% | 39.50% | 48.82% | -22.54% | 33.47% | 41.54% | 43.20% | 3.21% |
ANXG.L Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD | 17.42% | 11.70% | 28.70% | 48.00% | -25.42% | 29.85% | 43.37% | 34.20% | 4.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSTC.L and ANXG.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2018 | 0.94 |
The correlation between XSTC.L and ANXG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
XSTC.L vs. ANXG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSTC.L
ANXG.L
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Energy
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XSTC.L
ANXG.L
Industrials
XSTC.L
ANXG.L
Communication Services
XSTC.L
ANXG.L
Energy
XSTC.L
ANXG.L
Financial Services
XSTC.L
ANXG.L
Basic Materials
XSTC.L
-
ANXG.L
Consumer Cyclical
XSTC.L
-
ANXG.L
Consumer Defensive
XSTC.L
-
ANXG.L
Healthcare
XSTC.L
-
ANXG.L
Real Estate
XSTC.L
-
ANXG.L
Utilities
XSTC.L
-
ANXG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSTC.L vs. ANXG.L — Risk / Return Rank
XSTC.L
ANXG.L
XSTC.L vs. ANXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSTC.L | ANXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.45 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | 3.45 | -0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.05 | 10.11 | -3.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSTC.L | ANXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 2.56 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.05 | 0.96 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | 0.91 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
XSTC.L vs. ANXG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSTC.L drawdown since its inception was -29.30%, smaller than the maximum ANXG.L drawdown of -33.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSTC.L and ANXG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSTC.L | ANXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.30% | -33.00% | +3.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.49% | -11.04% | -6.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.30% | -24.54% | -4.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.30% | -27.69% | -1.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.18% | -2.68% | -2.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.29% | -6.03% | -0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.84% | 3.77% | +3.07% |
Volatility
XSTC.L vs. ANXG.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) has a higher volatility of 7.59% compared to Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L) at 4.63%. This indicates that XSTC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANXG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSTC.L | ANXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.59% | 4.63% | +2.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.66% | 10.57% | +4.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.88% | 14.89% | +4.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.24% | 19.16% | +3.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.41% | 21.10% | +1.31% |
XSTC.L vs. ANXG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSTC.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ANXG.L's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XSTC.L vs. ANXG.L - Dividend Comparison
XSTC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, while ANXG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANXG.L Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D | 0.26% | 0.33% | 0.37% | 0.53% | 1.08% | 0.53% | 0.63% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, XSTC.L and ANXG.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XSTC.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSTC.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for ANXG.L.
XSTC.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while ANXG.L is Nasdaq-100. XSTC.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while ANXG.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XSTC.L and 0.13% for ANXG.L.
Find the right allocation for XSTC.L and ANXG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer