PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XSP.TO vs. IXN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XSP.TO vs. IXN

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

XSP.TO (iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and IXN (iShares Global Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSP.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while IXN is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Information Technology Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSP.TO returned 13.25%/yr vs 25.90%/yr for IXN. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSP.TO charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for IXN.

Performance

XSP.TO vs. IXN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XSP.TO) and iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XSP.TO is traded in CAD, while IXN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IXN values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSP.TO achieves a 7.46% return, which is significantly lower than IXN's 34.36% return. Over the past 10 years, XSP.TO has underperformed IXN with an annualized return of 13.25%, while IXN has yielded a comparatively higher 25.90% annualized return.

XSP.TO

1D
0.25%
1M
0.19%
YTD
7.46%
6M
7.38%
1Y
22.08%
3Y*
19.32%
5Y*
11.15%
10Y*
13.25%

IXN

1D
2.69%
1M
6.33%
YTD
34.36%
6M
31.08%
1Y
64.86%
3Y*
35.13%
5Y*
25.12%
10Y*
25.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSP.TO vs. IXN - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSP.TO
iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		7.46%15.68%23.39%24.33%-19.32%24.27%15.16%29.37%-6.25%20.69%
IXN
iShares Global Tech ETF		34.41%19.53%35.41%49.34%-25.42%29.52%40.22%41.79%2.51%31.67%

Correlation

The correlation between XSP.TO and IXN is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2006

0.75

The correlation between XSP.TO and IXN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

XSP.TO vs. IXN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XSP.TO
IXN

Technology

36.2%
99.3%

Financial Services

11.9%

-

Communication Services

10.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%

-

Healthcare

8.4%
0.1%

Industrials

8.1%
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%
0.1%

Utilities

2.3%

-

Real Estate

1.9%
0.0%

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

XSP.TO
36.2%
IXN
99.3%

Financial Services

XSP.TO
11.9%
IXN

-

Communication Services

XSP.TO
10.9%
IXN

-

Consumer Cyclical

XSP.TO
10.1%
IXN

-

Healthcare

XSP.TO
8.4%
IXN
0.1%

Industrials

XSP.TO
8.1%
IXN
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

XSP.TO
4.9%
IXN

-

Energy

XSP.TO
3.5%
IXN
0.1%

Utilities

XSP.TO
2.3%
IXN

-

Real Estate

XSP.TO
1.9%
IXN
0.0%

Basic Materials

XSP.TO
1.8%
IXN

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

iShares Global Tech ETF

Often compared with XSP.TO:
XSP.TO vs. XUS.TOXSP.TO vs. XEQT.TOXSP.TO vs. ZSP.TOXSP.TO vs. VSP.TOXSP.TO vs. XIU.TOXSP.TO vs. VFVAXSP.TO vs. XQQ.TO
Often compared with IXN:
IXN vs. VGTIXN vs. QQQIXN vs. IGMIXN vs. XLKIXN vs. FTECIXN vs. VOOIXN vs. IETC

Return for Risk

XSP.TO vs. IXN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XSP.TO
XSP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
XSP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
XSP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
IXN
IXN Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
IXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXN Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXN Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSP.TO vs. IXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XSP.TO) and iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XSP.TOIXNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.85
2.78

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.52
3.35

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.45

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

4.64

-2.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.81

14.27

-3.45

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XSP.TO vs. IXN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSP.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is lower than the IXN Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSP.TO and IXN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XSP.TOIXNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

2.78

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.98

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

1.02

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.64

-0.15

Drawdowns

XSP.TO vs. IXN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSP.TO drawdown since its inception was -57.71%, which is greater than IXN's maximum drawdown of -43.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSP.TO and IXN.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XSP.TOIXNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.71%

-43.16%

-14.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.41%

-14.04%

+4.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.77%

-25.94%

+7.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.51%

-31.53%

+4.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.05%

-31.53%

-4.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.71%

-6.77%

+4.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.46%

-9.06%

-0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

4.56%

-2.51%

Volatility

XSP.TO vs. IXN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XSP.TO) is 4.07%, while iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) has a volatility of 11.57%. This indicates that XSP.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IXN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XSP.TOIXNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.07%

11.57%

-7.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.40%

19.85%

-10.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.04%

23.53%

-11.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.85%

25.80%

-8.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.24%

25.46%

-7.22%

XSP.TO vs. IXN - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSP.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IXN's 0.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

XSP.TO vs. IXN - Dividend Comparison

XSP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, more than IXN's 0.79% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IXN
iShares Global Tech ETF		0.79%1.04%0.43%0.55%0.81%0.58%0.63%1.06%0.94%0.93%1.03%1.12%
XSP.TO
iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		1.14%1.23%1.09%1.18%1.37%1.01%1.31%1.73%1.86%1.45%1.76%1.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

XSP.TO and IXN have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSP.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSP.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IXN.

XSP.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while IXN is Technology Equities. XSP.TO tracks S&P 500 Index, while IXN tracks S&P Global Information Technology Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XSP.TO and 0.46% for IXN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSP.TO and IXN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer