PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSMO vs. IJR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSMO vs. IJR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSMO achieves a 20.54% return, which is significantly higher than IJR's 15.49% return. Over the past 10 years, XSMO has outperformed IJR with an annualized return of 14.34%, while IJR has yielded a comparatively lower 10.61% annualized return.


XSMO

1D
0.66%
1M
-0.62%
YTD
20.54%
6M
18.72%
1Y
30.63%
3Y*
23.23%
5Y*
10.21%
10Y*
14.34%

IJR

1D
0.65%
1M
0.17%
YTD
15.49%
6M
15.12%
1Y
30.47%
3Y*
13.78%
5Y*
5.37%
10Y*
10.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSMO vs. IJR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSMO
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF
20.54%9.80%17.45%21.55%-15.44%19.24%21.96%28.65%-3.44%23.95%
IJR
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
15.49%5.89%8.63%16.06%-16.20%26.58%11.28%22.82%-8.51%13.15%

Correlation

The correlation between XSMO and IJR is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2005

0.88

The correlation between XSMO and IJR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

XSMO vs. IJR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSMO
IJR

Technology

20.9%
15.5%

Industrials

19.5%
15.5%

Healthcare

13.9%
11.1%

Financial Services

12.3%
16.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
13.4%

Basic Materials

5.8%
5.1%

Real Estate

5.0%
7.6%

Communication Services

4.1%
3.6%

Utilities

4.0%
2.0%

Energy

3.1%
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
3.5%

Technology

XSMO
20.9%
IJR
15.5%

Industrials

XSMO
19.5%
IJR
15.5%

Healthcare

XSMO
13.9%
IJR
11.1%

Financial Services

XSMO
12.3%
IJR
16.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XSMO
9.0%
IJR
13.4%

Basic Materials

XSMO
5.8%
IJR
5.1%

Real Estate

XSMO
5.0%
IJR
7.6%

Communication Services

XSMO
4.1%
IJR
3.6%

Utilities

XSMO
4.0%
IJR
2.0%

Energy

XSMO
3.1%
IJR
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

XSMO
2.4%
IJR
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSMO vs. IJR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSMO
XSMO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
XSMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
XSMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

IJR
IJR Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
IJR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJR Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IJR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJR Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSMO vs. IJR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSMOIJRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.30

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

3.52

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.75

11.72

+0.03

XSMO vs. IJR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the IJR Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSMO and IJR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSMOIJRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

1.74

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.25

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.47

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.43

-0.05

Drawdowns

XSMO vs. IJR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSMO drawdown since its inception was -58.06%, roughly equal to the maximum IJR drawdown of -58.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSMO and IJR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSMOIJRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.06%

-58.15%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-8.68%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.76%

-28.02%

+3.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.62%

-28.02%

-1.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.39%

-44.36%

+4.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.86%

-1.20%

-1.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.13%

-9.28%

-1.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

2.61%

0.00%

Volatility

XSMO vs. IJR - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) has a higher volatility of 6.73% compared to iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) at 4.73%. This indicates that XSMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IJR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSMOIJRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.73%

4.73%

+2.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.49%

11.82%

+2.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.01%

17.63%

+1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.68%

21.42%

+1.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.14%

22.92%

+1.22%

XSMO vs. IJR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSMO has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than IJR's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSMO vs. IJR - Dividend Comparison

XSMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than IJR's 1.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJR
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
1.15%1.44%2.05%1.31%1.41%1.53%1.11%1.44%1.58%1.20%1.22%1.48%
XSMO
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF
0.54%0.75%0.63%0.96%1.19%0.30%0.82%0.69%0.66%0.27%0.30%0.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, XSMO and IJR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XSMO has higher volatility (6.73%) compared to IJR (4.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSMO dropped -58.06% vs IJR's -58.15%.

On 10-year performance, XSMO leads with 14.34% vs 10.61% for IJR. On fees, IJR is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IJR has been the lower-risk option at 4.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XSMO has performed better with a 14.34% return vs 10.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IJR is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for XSMO.

IJR has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.54% for XSMO.

XSMO is categorized as Momentum, while IJR is Small Cap Blend Equities. XSMO tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index, while IJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for XSMO and 0.06% for IJR.

IJR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSMO and IJR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer