PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSB.TO vs. XEM.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSB.TO vs. XEM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF (XSB.TO) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF (XEM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSB.TO achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly lower than XEM.TO's 22.11% return. Over the past 10 years, XSB.TO has underperformed XEM.TO with an annualized return of 1.93%, while XEM.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.89% annualized return.


XSB.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.22%
YTD
0.80%
6M
1.10%
1Y
2.95%
3Y*
4.78%
5Y*
1.98%
10Y*
1.93%

XEM.TO

1D
1.87%
1M
-1.17%
YTD
22.11%
6M
22.63%
1Y
45.44%
3Y*
22.07%
5Y*
8.55%
10Y*
9.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSB.TO vs. XEM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSB.TO
iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF
0.80%3.70%5.87%4.67%-4.04%-1.11%5.20%3.20%1.60%0.13%
XEM.TO
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF
22.11%27.25%14.98%6.49%-15.74%-4.09%14.12%11.47%-8.06%27.79%

Correlation

The correlation between XSB.TO and XEM.TO is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2009

-0.04

The correlation between XSB.TO and XEM.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSB.TO vs. XEM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSB.TO
XSB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
XSB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
XSB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

XEM.TO
XEM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
XEM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
XEM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSB.TO vs. XEM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF (XSB.TO) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF (XEM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSB.TOXEM.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.42

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

3.72

-1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.68

13.29

-6.61

XSB.TO vs. XEM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the XEM.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSB.TO and XEM.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSB.TOXEM.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

2.24

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.51

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.55

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

0.41

+0.56

Drawdowns

XSB.TO vs. XEM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSB.TO drawdown since its inception was -8.65%, smaller than the maximum XEM.TO drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSB.TO and XEM.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSB.TOXEM.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.65%

-35.27%

+26.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.47%

-12.27%

+10.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.47%

-15.30%

+13.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.99%

-31.06%

+24.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.65%

-35.27%

+26.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-6.32%

+5.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.79%

-10.50%

+9.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.44%

3.43%

-2.99%

Volatility

XSB.TO vs. XEM.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF (XSB.TO) is 0.75%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF (XEM.TO) has a volatility of 10.27%. This indicates that XSB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSB.TOXEM.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.75%

10.27%

-9.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.68%

18.17%

-16.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99%

20.45%

-18.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.72%

16.97%

-14.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.40%

18.17%

-14.77%

XSB.TO vs. XEM.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSB.TO has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XEM.TO's 0.81% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSB.TO vs. XEM.TO - Dividend Comparison

XSB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, more than XEM.TO's 1.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XEM.TO
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF
1.56%1.90%2.08%2.39%2.10%1.91%1.28%2.56%1.95%1.78%1.97%2.24%
XSB.TO
iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF
3.11%3.15%3.05%2.67%2.28%2.05%2.21%2.39%2.39%2.36%2.36%2.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSB.TO and XEM.TO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSB.TO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSB.TO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for XEM.TO.

XSB.TO is categorized as Canadian Government Bonds, while XEM.TO is Emerging Markets Equities. XSB.TO tracks Morningstar Can 1-5Y Core Bd GR CAD, while XEM.TO tracks Morningstar EM GR CAD. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for XSB.TO and 0.81% for XEM.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSB.TO and XEM.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer