XNAS.L vs. XDEW.DE
XNAS.L (Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) and XDEW.DE (Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XNAS.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while XDEW.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XNAS.L returned 25.23%/yr vs 8.20%/yr for XDEW.DE. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.
Performance
XNAS.L vs. XDEW.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XNAS.L is traded in USD, while XDEW.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XDEW.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XNAS.L achieves a 16.34% return, which is significantly higher than XDEW.DE's 9.10% return.
XNAS.L
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 16.34%
- 6M
- 15.52%
- 1Y
- 36.22%
- 3Y*
- 27.22%
- 5Y*
- 25.23%
- 10Y*
- —
XDEW.DE
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 3.00%
- YTD
- 9.10%
- 6M
- 9.98%
- 1Y
- 19.64%
- 3Y*
- 15.17%
- 5Y*
- 8.20%
- 10Y*
- 11.50%
XNAS.L vs. XDEW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XNAS.L Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 16.34% | 19.82% | 26.59% | 88.40% | -25.44% | -8.88% |
XDEW.DE Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C | 9.10% | 12.37% | 11.87% | 13.56% | -12.06% | 24.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between XNAS.L and XDEW.DE is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2021 | 0.57 |
The correlation between XNAS.L and XDEW.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XNAS.L vs. XDEW.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XNAS.L
XDEW.DE
XNAS.L vs. XDEW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDEW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XNAS.L | XDEW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.32 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 2.94 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.81 | 10.24 | +1.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XNAS.L | XDEW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.26 | 1.84 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.11 | 0.51 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.61 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
XNAS.L vs. XDEW.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNAS.L drawdown since its inception was -34.26%, smaller than the maximum XDEW.DE drawdown of -39.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNAS.L and XDEW.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XNAS.L | XDEW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.26% | -39.23% | +4.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.91% | -6.73% | -4.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.92% | -19.71% | -3.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.52% | -20.94% | -6.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.52% | 0.00% | -3.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.37% | -4.55% | -5.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 1.93% | +1.13% |
Volatility
XNAS.L vs. XDEW.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDEW.DE) at 2.30%. This indicates that XNAS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XNAS.L | XDEW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.49% | 2.30% | +3.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.01% | 7.16% | +4.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.02% | 10.76% | +5.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.70% | 15.81% | +6.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.23% | 17.27% | +7.96% |
XNAS.L vs. XDEW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XNAS.L and XDEW.DE have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XNAS.L vs. XDEW.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XNAS.L nor XDEW.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XNAS.L and XDEW.DE have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XNAS.L and XDEW.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.
XNAS.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while XDEW.DE is S&P 500. XNAS.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while XDEW.DE tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index.
Find the right allocation for XNAS.L and XDEW.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer