XMMO vs. VDE
XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) and VDE (Vanguard Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while VDE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMMO returned 19.50%/yr vs 9.47%/yr for VDE. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMMO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VDE.
Performance
XMMO vs. VDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMMO achieves a 19.66% return, which is significantly lower than VDE's 31.33% return. Over the past 10 years, XMMO has outperformed VDE with an annualized return of 19.50%, while VDE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.47% annualized return.
XMMO
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 19.66%
- 6M
- 19.51%
- 1Y
- 31.14%
- 3Y*
- 29.91%
- 5Y*
- 15.72%
- 10Y*
- 19.50%
VDE
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 3.82%
- YTD
- 31.33%
- 6M
- 29.93%
- 1Y
- 44.64%
- 3Y*
- 16.98%
- 5Y*
- 20.26%
- 10Y*
- 9.47%
XMMO vs. VDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 19.66% | 13.04% | 38.03% | 20.39% | -16.02% | 16.69% | 29.17% | 36.78% | 6.12% | 37.18% |
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 31.33% | 7.11% | 6.75% | 0.03% | 62.89% | 56.31% | -33.02% | 9.28% | -19.95% | -2.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMMO and VDE is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2005 | 0.56 |
The correlation between XMMO and VDE shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XMMO vs. VDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMMO
VDE
Industrials
Technology
-
Energy
Basic Materials
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
XMMO
VDE
Technology
XMMO
VDE
-
Energy
XMMO
VDE
Basic Materials
XMMO
VDE
Healthcare
XMMO
VDE
-
Real Estate
XMMO
VDE
-
Utilities
XMMO
VDE
-
Consumer Cyclical
XMMO
VDE
-
Financial Services
XMMO
VDE
-
Communication Services
XMMO
VDE
-
Consumer Defensive
XMMO
VDE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMMO vs. VDE — Risk / Return Rank
XMMO
VDE
XMMO vs. VDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMMO | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.35 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.75 | 3.80 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.23 | 10.98 | +4.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMMO | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 2.21 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.77 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | 0.32 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.28 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
XMMO vs. VDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMMO drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, smaller than the maximum VDE drawdown of -74.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMO and VDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMMO | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.37% | -74.20% | +18.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -11.80% | +3.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.93% | -21.41% | -3.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.91% | -26.58% | -1.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.74% | -69.29% | +32.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.69% | -7.08% | +3.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.45% | -19.96% | +10.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 4.08% | -2.01% |
Volatility
XMMO vs. VDE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a higher volatility of 7.70% compared to Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) at 6.96%. This indicates that XMMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMMO | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.70% | 6.96% | +0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.07% | 16.37% | -0.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.18% | 20.36% | -1.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.52% | 26.42% | -4.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.31% | 29.93% | -7.62% |
XMMO vs. VDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMMO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VDE's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMMO vs. VDE - Dividend Comparison
XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than VDE's 2.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 2.39% | 3.11% | 3.23% | 3.34% | 3.65% | 4.13% | 4.76% | 3.42% | 3.35% | 2.90% | 2.31% | 3.17% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.62% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMMO and VDE have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XMMO has higher volatility (7.70%) compared to VDE (6.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMMO dropped -55.37% vs VDE's -74.20%.
On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 19.50% vs 9.47% for VDE. On fees, VDE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VDE has been the lower-risk option at 6.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 19.50% return vs 9.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VDE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.
VDE has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 0.62% for XMMO.
XMMO is categorized as Momentum, while VDE is Energy Equities. XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while VDE tracks MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMMO and 0.09% for VDE.
VDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XMMO and VDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer