PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMMO vs. VDE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMMO vs. VDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMMO achieves a 19.66% return, which is significantly lower than VDE's 31.33% return. Over the past 10 years, XMMO has outperformed VDE with an annualized return of 19.50%, while VDE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.47% annualized return.


XMMO

1D
0.46%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
19.66%
6M
19.51%
1Y
31.14%
3Y*
29.91%
5Y*
15.72%
10Y*
19.50%

VDE

1D
1.27%
1M
3.82%
YTD
31.33%
6M
29.93%
1Y
44.64%
3Y*
16.98%
5Y*
20.26%
10Y*
9.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMMO vs. VDE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
19.66%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%16.69%29.17%36.78%6.12%37.18%
VDE
Vanguard Energy ETF
31.33%7.11%6.75%0.03%62.89%56.31%-33.02%9.28%-19.95%-2.50%

Correlation

The correlation between XMMO and VDE is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2005

0.56

The correlation between XMMO and VDE shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XMMO vs. VDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XMMO
VDE

Industrials

41.1%
0.1%

Technology

16.7%

-

Energy

7.7%
99.5%

Basic Materials

7.2%
0.4%

Healthcare

6.3%

-

Real Estate

6.1%

-

Utilities

5.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

4.6%

-

Financial Services

2.4%

-

Communication Services

1.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.5%

-

Industrials

XMMO
41.1%
VDE
0.1%

Technology

XMMO
16.7%
VDE

-

Energy

XMMO
7.7%
VDE
99.5%

Basic Materials

XMMO
7.2%
VDE
0.4%

Healthcare

XMMO
6.3%
VDE

-

Real Estate

XMMO
6.1%
VDE

-

Utilities

XMMO
5.8%
VDE

-

Consumer Cyclical

XMMO
4.6%
VDE

-

Financial Services

XMMO
2.4%
VDE

-

Communication Services

XMMO
1.6%
VDE

-

Consumer Defensive

XMMO
0.5%
VDE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMMO vs. VDE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

VDE
VDE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
VDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMMO vs. VDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMMOVDEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.35

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

3.80

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.23

10.98

+4.25

XMMO vs. VDE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the VDE Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMMO and VDE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMMOVDEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

2.21

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.77

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

0.32

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.28

+0.29

Drawdowns

XMMO vs. VDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMMO drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, smaller than the maximum VDE drawdown of -74.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMO and VDE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMMOVDEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.37%

-74.20%

+18.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

-11.80%

+3.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.93%

-21.41%

-3.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.91%

-26.58%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.74%

-69.29%

+32.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.69%

-7.08%

+3.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.45%

-19.96%

+10.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

4.08%

-2.01%

Volatility

XMMO vs. VDE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a higher volatility of 7.70% compared to Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) at 6.96%. This indicates that XMMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMMOVDEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.70%

6.96%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.07%

16.37%

-0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.18%

20.36%

-1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.52%

26.42%

-4.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.31%

29.93%

-7.62%

XMMO vs. VDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMMO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VDE's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMMO vs. VDE - Dividend Comparison

XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than VDE's 2.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VDE
Vanguard Energy ETF
2.39%3.11%3.23%3.34%3.65%4.13%4.76%3.42%3.35%2.90%2.31%3.17%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.62%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMMO and VDE have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XMMO has higher volatility (7.70%) compared to VDE (6.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMMO dropped -55.37% vs VDE's -74.20%.

On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 19.50% vs 9.47% for VDE. On fees, VDE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VDE has been the lower-risk option at 6.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 19.50% return vs 9.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VDE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.

VDE has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 0.62% for XMMO.

XMMO is categorized as Momentum, while VDE is Energy Equities. XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while VDE tracks MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMMO and 0.09% for VDE.

VDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMMO and VDE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer