PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMMO vs. TIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMMO vs. TIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMMO achieves a 19.66% return, which is significantly higher than TIP's 0.95% return. Over the past 10 years, XMMO has outperformed TIP with an annualized return of 19.50%, while TIP has yielded a comparatively lower 2.45% annualized return.


XMMO

1D
0.46%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
19.66%
6M
19.51%
1Y
31.14%
3Y*
29.91%
5Y*
15.72%
10Y*
19.50%

TIP

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.90%
YTD
0.95%
6M
0.97%
1Y
4.81%
3Y*
3.70%
5Y*
0.88%
10Y*
2.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMMO vs. TIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
19.66%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%16.69%29.17%36.78%6.12%37.18%
TIP
iShares TIPS Bond ETF
0.95%6.77%1.65%3.80%-12.26%5.68%10.84%8.35%-1.42%2.92%

Correlation

The correlation between XMMO and TIP is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2005

-0.07

The correlation between XMMO and TIP shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMMO vs. TIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

TIP
TIP Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
TIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIP Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
TIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIP Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMMO vs. TIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMMOTIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.26

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

2.45

+1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.23

7.37

+7.86

XMMO vs. TIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the TIP Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMMO and TIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMMOTIPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

1.43

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.14

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

0.43

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.57

0.00

Drawdowns

XMMO vs. TIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMMO drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, which is greater than TIP's maximum drawdown of -14.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMO and TIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMMOTIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.37%

-14.57%

-40.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

-1.98%

-6.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.93%

-4.54%

-20.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.91%

-14.51%

-13.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.74%

-14.51%

-22.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.69%

-0.90%

-2.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.45%

-3.43%

-6.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

0.65%

+1.42%

Volatility

XMMO vs. TIP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a higher volatility of 7.70% compared to iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) at 1.01%. This indicates that XMMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMMOTIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.70%

1.01%

+6.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.07%

2.33%

+13.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.18%

3.38%

+15.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.52%

6.21%

+15.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.31%

5.74%

+16.57%

XMMO vs. TIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMMO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than TIP's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMMO vs. TIP - Dividend Comparison

XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than TIP's 3.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TIP
iShares TIPS Bond ETF
3.78%3.46%2.52%2.73%6.96%4.28%1.17%1.75%2.71%2.07%1.48%0.34%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.62%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMMO and TIP have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XMMO has higher volatility (7.70%) compared to TIP (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMMO dropped -55.37% vs TIP's -14.57%.

On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 19.50% vs 2.45% for TIP. On fees, TIP is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, TIP has been the lower-risk option at 1.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 19.50% return vs 2.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TIP is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.

TIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.78%, compared with 0.62% for XMMO.

XMMO is categorized as Momentum, while TIP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while TIP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMMO and 0.18% for TIP.

XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMMO and TIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer