PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMMO vs. PTTRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMMO vs. PTTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and PIMCO Total Return Fund Institutional Class (PTTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMMO achieves a 19.66% return, which is significantly higher than PTTRX's -0.05% return. Over the past 10 years, XMMO has outperformed PTTRX with an annualized return of 19.50%, while PTTRX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.23% annualized return.


XMMO

1D
0.46%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
19.66%
6M
19.51%
1Y
31.14%
3Y*
29.91%
5Y*
15.72%
10Y*
19.50%

PTTRX

1D
-0.46%
1M
-0.61%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
0.68%
1Y
6.97%
3Y*
5.16%
5Y*
0.54%
10Y*
2.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMMO vs. PTTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
19.66%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%16.69%29.17%36.78%6.12%37.18%
PTTRX
PIMCO Total Return Fund Institutional Class
-0.05%9.35%2.62%6.33%-14.72%-0.59%8.88%8.36%-0.24%5.13%

Correlation

The correlation between XMMO and PTTRX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2005

-0.07

The correlation between XMMO and PTTRX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMMO vs. PTTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

PTTRX
PTTRX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
PTTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
PTTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMMO vs. PTTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and PIMCO Total Return Fund Institutional Class (PTTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMMOPTTRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.25

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

1.70

+2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.23

5.19

+10.03

XMMO vs. PTTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the PTTRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMMO and PTTRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMMOPTTRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

1.35

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.09

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

0.43

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

1.14

-0.58

Drawdowns

XMMO vs. PTTRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMMO drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, which is greater than PTTRX's maximum drawdown of -19.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMO and PTTRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMMOPTTRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.37%

-19.28%

-36.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

-3.69%

-4.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.93%

-6.18%

-18.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.91%

-19.28%

-8.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.74%

-19.28%

-17.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.69%

-2.16%

-1.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.45%

-2.19%

-7.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

1.21%

+0.86%

Volatility

XMMO vs. PTTRX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a higher volatility of 7.70% compared to PIMCO Total Return Fund Institutional Class (PTTRX) at 1.73%. This indicates that XMMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMMOPTTRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.70%

1.73%

+5.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.07%

3.55%

+12.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.18%

4.64%

+14.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.52%

6.27%

+15.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.31%

5.23%

+17.08%

XMMO vs. PTTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMMO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PTTRX's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMMO vs. PTTRX - Dividend Comparison

XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than PTTRX's 4.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PTTRX
PIMCO Total Return Fund Institutional Class
4.57%4.47%4.61%3.81%3.63%2.59%6.11%3.96%3.13%2.63%3.02%6.64%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.62%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMMO and PTTRX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XMMO has higher volatility (7.70%) compared to PTTRX (1.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMMO dropped -55.37% vs PTTRX's -19.28%.

XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMMO and PTTRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer