PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMMO vs. MDCPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMMO vs. MDCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and BlackRock Balanced Capital Fund Investor A Shares (MDCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMMO achieves a 19.66% return, which is significantly higher than MDCPX's 6.42% return. Over the past 10 years, XMMO has outperformed MDCPX with an annualized return of 19.50%, while MDCPX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.99% annualized return.


XMMO

1D
0.46%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
19.66%
6M
19.51%
1Y
31.14%
3Y*
29.91%
5Y*
15.72%
10Y*
19.50%

MDCPX

1D
-1.99%
1M
-0.68%
YTD
6.42%
6M
7.39%
1Y
16.87%
3Y*
14.13%
5Y*
7.95%
10Y*
9.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMMO vs. MDCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
19.66%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%16.69%29.17%36.78%6.12%37.18%
MDCPX
BlackRock Balanced Capital Fund Investor A Shares
6.42%15.32%12.47%16.59%-15.70%16.49%15.07%21.59%-3.48%14.24%

Correlation

The correlation between XMMO and MDCPX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2005

0.83

The correlation between XMMO and MDCPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMMO vs. MDCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

MDCPX
MDCPX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
MDCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
MDCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMMO vs. MDCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and BlackRock Balanced Capital Fund Investor A Shares (MDCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMMOMDCPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.38

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

2.80

+0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.23

12.12

+3.11

XMMO vs. MDCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the MDCPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMMO and MDCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMMOMDCPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

2.04

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.72

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

0.87

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.66

-0.09

Drawdowns

XMMO vs. MDCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMMO drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, which is greater than MDCPX's maximum drawdown of -41.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMO and MDCPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMMOMDCPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.37%

-41.98%

-13.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

-6.22%

-2.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.93%

-10.65%

-14.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.91%

-21.99%

-5.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.74%

-24.58%

-12.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.69%

-2.36%

-1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.45%

-5.09%

-4.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

1.43%

+0.64%

Volatility

XMMO vs. MDCPX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a higher volatility of 7.70% compared to BlackRock Balanced Capital Fund Investor A Shares (MDCPX) at 3.07%. This indicates that XMMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMMOMDCPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.70%

3.07%

+4.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.07%

7.03%

+9.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.18%

8.55%

+10.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.52%

11.09%

+10.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.31%

11.48%

+10.83%

XMMO vs. MDCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMMO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than MDCPX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMMO vs. MDCPX - Dividend Comparison

XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than MDCPX's 8.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDCPX
BlackRock Balanced Capital Fund Investor A Shares
8.09%8.61%7.44%2.63%3.82%12.27%4.02%5.25%7.84%19.39%4.67%5.04%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.62%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMMO and MDCPX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XMMO has higher volatility (7.70%) compared to MDCPX (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMMO dropped -55.37% vs MDCPX's -41.98%.

MDCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMMO and MDCPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer