XMMO vs. GBTC
XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) and GBTC (Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while GBTC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark Rate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMMO returned 19.50%/yr vs 49.25%/yr for GBTC. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XMMO charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for GBTC.
Performance
XMMO vs. GBTC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMMO achieves a 19.66% return, which is significantly higher than GBTC's -28.07% return. Over the past 10 years, XMMO has underperformed GBTC with an annualized return of 19.50%, while GBTC has yielded a comparatively higher 49.25% annualized return.
XMMO
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 19.66%
- 6M
- 19.51%
- 1Y
- 31.14%
- 3Y*
- 29.91%
- 5Y*
- 15.72%
- 10Y*
- 19.50%
GBTC
- 1D
- 5.06%
- 1M
- -21.09%
- YTD
- -28.07%
- 6M
- -30.74%
- 1Y
- -40.20%
- 3Y*
- 53.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.31%
- 10Y*
- 49.25%
XMMO vs. GBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 19.66% | 13.04% | 38.03% | 20.39% | -16.02% | 16.69% | 29.17% | 36.78% | 6.12% | 37.18% |
GBTC Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF | -28.07% | -7.65% | 113.81% | 317.61% | -75.80% | 7.03% | 290.72% | 106.56% | -82.10% | 1,787.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMMO and GBTC is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2015 | 0.24 |
The correlation between XMMO and GBTC shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMMO vs. GBTC — Risk / Return Rank
XMMO
GBTC
XMMO vs. GBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMMO | GBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 0.86 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.75 | -0.77 | +4.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.23 | -1.38 | +16.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMMO | GBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | -0.91 | +2.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.17 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | 0.60 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.65 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
XMMO vs. GBTC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMMO drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, smaller than the maximum GBTC drawdown of -89.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMO and GBTC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMMO | GBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.37% | -89.91% | +34.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -52.45% | +44.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.93% | -52.45% | +27.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.91% | -85.42% | +57.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.74% | -89.91% | +53.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.69% | -50.05% | +46.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.45% | -43.44% | +33.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 29.16% | -27.09% |
Volatility
XMMO vs. GBTC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) is 7.70%, while Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC) has a volatility of 11.75%. This indicates that XMMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMMO | GBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.70% | 11.75% | -4.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.07% | 34.55% | -18.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.18% | 44.19% | -25.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.52% | 62.40% | -40.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.31% | 82.22% | -59.91% |
XMMO vs. GBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMMO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GBTC's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMMO vs. GBTC - Dividend Comparison
XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, while GBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBTC Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.62% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMMO and GBTC have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GBTC has higher volatility (11.75%) compared to XMMO (7.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMMO dropped -55.37% vs GBTC's -89.91%.
On 10-year performance, GBTC leads with 49.25% vs 19.50% for XMMO. On fees, XMMO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XMMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GBTC has performed better with a 49.25% return vs 19.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XMMO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for GBTC.
XMMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for GBTC.
XMMO is categorized as Momentum, while GBTC is Cryptocurrency. XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while GBTC tracks CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark Rate Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMMO and 1.50% for GBTC.
XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XMMO and GBTC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer