XMMO vs. FXF
XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) and FXF (Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while FXF is a Currency fund tracking the Swiss Franc. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMMO returned 19.50%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for FXF. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XMMO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for FXF.
Performance
XMMO vs. FXF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMMO achieves a 19.66% return, which is significantly higher than FXF's -0.97% return. Over the past 10 years, XMMO has outperformed FXF with an annualized return of 19.50%, while FXF has yielded a comparatively lower 1.04% annualized return.
XMMO
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 19.66%
- 6M
- 19.51%
- 1Y
- 31.14%
- 3Y*
- 29.91%
- 5Y*
- 15.72%
- 10Y*
- 19.50%
FXF
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -2.70%
- YTD
- -0.97%
- 6M
- 0.83%
- 1Y
- 2.42%
- 3Y*
- 3.92%
- 5Y*
- 1.79%
- 10Y*
- 1.04%
XMMO vs. FXF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 19.66% | 13.04% | 38.03% | 20.39% | -16.02% | 16.69% | 29.17% | 36.78% | 6.12% | 37.18% |
FXF Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust | -0.97% | 14.04% | -7.46% | 9.63% | -2.29% | -4.08% | 8.18% | 0.32% | -2.01% | 3.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMMO and FXF is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2006 | 0.04 |
The correlation between XMMO and FXF shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMMO vs. FXF — Risk / Return Rank
XMMO
FXF
XMMO vs. FXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMMO | FXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.06 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.75 | 0.50 | +3.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.23 | 1.10 | +14.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMMO | FXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 0.33 | +1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.22 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | 0.14 | +0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.17 | +0.40 |
Drawdowns
XMMO vs. FXF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMMO drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, which is greater than FXF's maximum drawdown of -35.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMO and FXF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMMO | FXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.37% | -35.58% | -19.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -4.82% | -3.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.93% | -8.52% | -16.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.91% | -13.03% | -14.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.74% | -15.04% | -21.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.69% | -19.16% | +15.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.45% | -20.84% | +11.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 2.20% | -0.13% |
Volatility
XMMO vs. FXF - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a higher volatility of 7.70% compared to Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF) at 1.78%. This indicates that XMMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMMO | FXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.70% | 1.78% | +5.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.07% | 5.59% | +10.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.18% | 7.49% | +11.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.52% | 8.33% | +13.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.31% | 7.57% | +14.74% |
XMMO vs. FXF - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMMO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FXF's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMMO vs. FXF - Dividend Comparison
XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, while FXF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXF Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.62% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMMO and FXF have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XMMO has higher volatility (7.70%) compared to FXF (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMMO dropped -55.37% vs FXF's -35.58%.
On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 19.50% vs 1.04% for FXF. On fees, XMMO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FXF has been the lower-risk option at 1.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 19.50% return vs 1.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XMMO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FXF.
XMMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for FXF.
XMMO is categorized as Momentum, while FXF is Currency. XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while FXF tracks Swiss Franc. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMMO and 0.40% for FXF.
XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XMMO and FXF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer