PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLY vs. XYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLY vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLY achieves a -3.17% return, which is significantly lower than XYLD's 4.47% return. Over the past 10 years, XLY has outperformed XYLD with an annualized return of 12.57%, while XYLD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.23% annualized return.


XLY

1D
0.46%
1M
-4.00%
YTD
-3.17%
6M
-1.81%
1Y
9.63%
3Y*
13.63%
5Y*
6.99%
10Y*
12.57%

XYLD

1D
0.27%
1M
0.88%
YTD
4.47%
6M
5.83%
1Y
16.60%
3Y*
10.96%
5Y*
7.62%
10Y*
8.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLY vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
-3.17%7.37%26.51%39.64%-36.27%27.93%29.63%28.39%1.58%22.82%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
4.47%8.02%19.49%11.10%-12.05%19.59%-0.56%21.41%-6.09%16.49%

Correlation

The correlation between XLY and XYLD is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2013

0.71

The correlation between XLY and XYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLY vs. XYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLY
XYLD

Consumer Cyclical

97.6%
10.2%

Communication Services

1.3%
11.2%

Technology

0.9%
35.6%

Industrials

0.1%
8.3%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Financial Services

-

11.8%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XLY
97.6%
XYLD
10.2%

Communication Services

XLY
1.3%
XYLD
11.2%

Technology

XLY
0.9%
XYLD
35.6%

Industrials

XLY
0.1%
XYLD
8.3%

Basic Materials

XLY

-

XYLD
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

XLY

-

XYLD
4.9%

Energy

XLY

-

XYLD
3.5%

Financial Services

XLY

-

XYLD
11.8%

Healthcare

XLY

-

XYLD
8.5%

Real Estate

XLY

-

XYLD
1.9%

Utilities

XLY

-

XYLD
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLY vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLY
XLY Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
XLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLY Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLY Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

XYLD
XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLY vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLYXYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.59

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

3.15

-2.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.01

16.73

-14.72

XLY vs. XYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLY Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the XYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLY and XYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLYXYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

2.53

-2.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.68

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.58

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.60

-0.18

Drawdowns

XLY vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLY drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, which is greater than XYLD's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLY and XYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLYXYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.05%

-33.46%

-25.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.98%

-5.29%

-9.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.01%

-15.53%

-10.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.67%

-18.66%

-21.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.67%

-33.46%

-6.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.15%

-0.64%

-6.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.56%

-3.72%

-5.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.80%

0.99%

+3.81%

Volatility

XLY vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison

Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) has a higher volatility of 5.32% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) at 1.33%. This indicates that XLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLYXYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.32%

1.33%

+3.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.22%

5.46%

+7.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.09%

6.60%

+11.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.80%

11.23%

+12.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.06%

14.21%

+7.85%

XLY vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLY has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLY vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison

XLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than XYLD's 10.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
0.77%0.79%0.72%0.78%1.00%0.53%0.82%1.28%1.34%1.20%1.71%1.43%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
10.57%10.51%11.54%10.51%13.43%9.07%7.93%5.76%7.12%5.18%3.23%4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLY and XYLD have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLY has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to XYLD (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLY dropped -59.05% vs XYLD's -33.46%.

On 10-year performance, XLY leads with 12.57% vs 8.23% for XYLD. On fees, XLY is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, XYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLY has performed better with a 12.57% return vs 8.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLY is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XYLD.

XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.57%, compared with 0.77% for XLY.

XLY is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while XYLD is Derivative Income. XLY tracks Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, while XYLD tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XLY and 0.60% for XYLD.

XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLY and XYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer