XLY vs. XYLD
XLY (Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund) and XYLD (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLY is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, while XYLD is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLY returned 12.57%/yr vs 8.23%/yr for XYLD. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLY charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XYLD.
Performance
XLY vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLY achieves a -3.17% return, which is significantly lower than XYLD's 4.47% return. Over the past 10 years, XLY has outperformed XYLD with an annualized return of 12.57%, while XYLD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.23% annualized return.
XLY
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -4.00%
- YTD
- -3.17%
- 6M
- -1.81%
- 1Y
- 9.63%
- 3Y*
- 13.63%
- 5Y*
- 6.99%
- 10Y*
- 12.57%
XYLD
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 4.47%
- 6M
- 5.83%
- 1Y
- 16.60%
- 3Y*
- 10.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.62%
- 10Y*
- 8.23%
XLY vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | -3.17% | 7.37% | 26.51% | 39.64% | -36.27% | 27.93% | 29.63% | 28.39% | 1.58% | 22.82% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 4.47% | 8.02% | 19.49% | 11.10% | -12.05% | 19.59% | -0.56% | 21.41% | -6.09% | 16.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLY and XYLD is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2013 | 0.71 |
The correlation between XLY and XYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
XLY vs. XYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLY
XYLD
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLY
XYLD
Communication Services
XLY
XYLD
Technology
XLY
XYLD
Industrials
XLY
XYLD
Basic Materials
XLY
-
XYLD
Consumer Defensive
XLY
-
XYLD
Energy
XLY
-
XYLD
Financial Services
XLY
-
XYLD
Healthcare
XLY
-
XYLD
Real Estate
XLY
-
XYLD
Utilities
XLY
-
XYLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLY vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank
XLY
XYLD
XLY vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLY | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.59 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.65 | 3.15 | -2.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.01 | 16.73 | -14.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLY | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 | 2.53 | -2.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.68 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.58 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.60 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
XLY vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLY drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, which is greater than XYLD's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLY and XYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLY | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.05% | -33.46% | -25.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.98% | -5.29% | -9.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.01% | -15.53% | -10.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.67% | -18.66% | -21.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.67% | -33.46% | -6.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.15% | -0.64% | -6.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.56% | -3.72% | -5.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.80% | 0.99% | +3.81% |
Volatility
XLY vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) has a higher volatility of 5.32% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) at 1.33%. This indicates that XLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLY | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.32% | 1.33% | +3.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.22% | 5.46% | +7.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.09% | 6.60% | +11.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.80% | 11.23% | +12.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.06% | 14.21% | +7.85% |
XLY vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLY has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLY vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison
XLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than XYLD's 10.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | 0.77% | 0.79% | 0.72% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.28% | 1.34% | 1.20% | 1.71% | 1.43% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 10.57% | 10.51% | 11.54% | 10.51% | 13.43% | 9.07% | 7.93% | 5.76% | 7.12% | 5.18% | 3.23% | 4.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLY and XYLD have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLY has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to XYLD (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLY dropped -59.05% vs XYLD's -33.46%.
On 10-year performance, XLY leads with 12.57% vs 8.23% for XYLD. On fees, XLY is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, XYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLY has performed better with a 12.57% return vs 8.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLY is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XYLD.
XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.57%, compared with 0.77% for XLY.
XLY is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while XYLD is Derivative Income. XLY tracks Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, while XYLD tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XLY and 0.60% for XYLD.
XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLY and XYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer