PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLY vs. AQMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLY vs. AQMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund (AQMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLY achieves a -3.17% return, which is significantly lower than AQMIX's 12.43% return. Over the past 10 years, XLY has outperformed AQMIX with an annualized return of 12.57%, while AQMIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.98% annualized return.


XLY

1D
0.46%
1M
-4.00%
YTD
-3.17%
6M
-1.81%
1Y
9.63%
3Y*
13.63%
5Y*
6.99%
10Y*
12.57%

AQMIX

1D
-0.55%
1M
1.22%
YTD
12.43%
6M
14.53%
1Y
25.35%
3Y*
12.47%
5Y*
12.60%
10Y*
4.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLY vs. AQMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
-3.17%7.37%26.51%39.64%-36.27%27.93%29.63%28.39%1.58%22.82%
AQMIX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund
12.43%14.62%8.13%2.08%35.47%-1.04%-0.43%1.92%-8.88%-0.97%

Correlation

The correlation between XLY and AQMIX is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

0.02

The correlation between XLY and AQMIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (5 years) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLY vs. AQMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLY
XLY Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
XLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLY Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLY Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

AQMIX
AQMIX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AQMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AQMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
AQMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
AQMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AQMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLY vs. AQMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund (AQMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLYAQMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.50

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

8.24

-7.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.01

26.92

-24.91

XLY vs. AQMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLY Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the AQMIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLY and AQMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLYAQMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

2.85

-2.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

1.09

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.48

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.42

0.00

Drawdowns

XLY vs. AQMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLY drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, which is greater than AQMIX's maximum drawdown of -26.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLY and AQMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLYAQMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.05%

-26.52%

-32.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.98%

-3.02%

-11.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.01%

-13.57%

-12.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.67%

-13.57%

-26.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.67%

-23.34%

-16.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.15%

-1.19%

-5.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.56%

-10.00%

+0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.80%

0.98%

+3.82%

Volatility

XLY vs. AQMIX - Volatility Comparison

Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) has a higher volatility of 5.32% compared to AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund (AQMIX) at 2.64%. This indicates that XLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AQMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLYAQMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.32%

2.64%

+2.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.22%

6.67%

+6.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.09%

8.75%

+9.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.80%

11.63%

+12.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.06%

10.37%

+11.69%

XLY vs. AQMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLY has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than AQMIX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLY vs. AQMIX - Dividend Comparison

XLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than AQMIX's 2.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AQMIX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund
2.01%2.26%3.83%8.39%12.76%6.94%5.31%3.13%0.00%0.00%0.02%6.51%
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
0.77%0.79%0.72%0.78%1.00%0.53%0.82%1.28%1.34%1.20%1.71%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLY and AQMIX have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLY has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to AQMIX (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLY dropped -59.05% vs AQMIX's -26.52%.

AQMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLY and AQMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer