XLV vs. XHYD
XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) and XHYD (BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLV is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index, while XHYD is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclical. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XLV returned 7.16%/yr vs 7.51%/yr for XHYD. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLV charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XHYD.
Performance
XLV vs. XHYD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLV achieves a -0.98% return, which is significantly lower than XHYD's 0.44% return.
XLV
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 6.38%
- YTD
- -0.98%
- 6M
- 1.65%
- 1Y
- 15.62%
- 3Y*
- 7.16%
- 5Y*
- 6.05%
- 10Y*
- 9.65%
XHYD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 0.44%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 5.22%
- 3Y*
- 7.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLV vs. XHYD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | -0.98% | 14.50% | 2.47% | 2.07% | 7.39% |
XHYD BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF | 0.44% | 8.33% | 6.29% | 11.75% | -5.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLV and XHYD is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022 | 0.42 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XLV and XHYD has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XLV vs. XHYD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLV
XHYD
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
XLV
XHYD
-
Basic Materials
XLV
-
XHYD
Communication Services
XLV
-
XHYD
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLV
-
XHYD
Consumer Defensive
XLV
-
XHYD
Energy
XLV
-
XHYD
-
Financial Services
XLV
-
XHYD
Industrials
XLV
-
XHYD
Real Estate
XLV
-
XHYD
-
Technology
XLV
-
XHYD
-
Utilities
XLV
-
XHYD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLV vs. XHYD — Risk / Return Rank
XLV
XHYD
XLV vs. XHYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLV | XHYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.32 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | 2.36 | -0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.60 | 10.53 | -6.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLV | XHYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.05 | 1.55 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.67 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
XLV vs. XHYD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLV drawdown since its inception was -39.17%, which is greater than XHYD's maximum drawdown of -11.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLV and XHYD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLV | XHYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.17% | -11.02% | -28.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.47% | -2.49% | -7.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.11% | -3.70% | -13.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.32% | -1.08% | -3.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.12% | -2.04% | -5.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.35% | 0.56% | +3.79% |
Volatility
XLV vs. XHYD - Volatility Comparison
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) has a higher volatility of 5.02% compared to BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYD) at 1.83%. This indicates that XLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XHYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLV | XHYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.02% | 1.83% | +3.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.66% | 3.28% | +7.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.99% | 3.79% | +11.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.76% | 7.15% | +7.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 7.15% | +9.43% |
XLV vs. XHYD - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XHYD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLV vs. XHYD - Dividend Comparison
XLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, while XHYD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHYD BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF | 5.31% | 5.83% | 6.32% | 5.80% | 5.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.64% | 1.60% | 1.67% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.57% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLV and XHYD have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLV has higher volatility (5.02%) compared to XHYD (1.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLV dropped -39.17% vs XHYD's -11.02%.
On 3-year performance, XHYD leads with 7.51% vs 7.16% for XLV. On fees, XLV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XHYD has been the lower-risk option at 1.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XHYD has performed better with a 7.51% return vs 7.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XHYD.
XHYD has the higher dividend yield at 5.31%, compared with 1.64% for XLV.
XLV is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while XHYD is High Yield Bonds. XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index, while XHYD tracks ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclical. They also come from different issuers: State Street and BondBloxx. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLV and 0.35% for XHYD.
XHYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLV and XHYD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer