PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLV vs. VYMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLV vs. VYMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLV achieves a -0.98% return, which is significantly lower than VYMI's 10.04% return. Over the past 10 years, XLV has underperformed VYMI with an annualized return of 9.65%, while VYMI has yielded a comparatively higher 10.62% annualized return.


XLV

1D
-0.24%
1M
6.38%
YTD
-0.98%
6M
1.65%
1Y
15.62%
3Y*
7.16%
5Y*
6.05%
10Y*
9.65%

VYMI

1D
0.24%
1M
-1.37%
YTD
10.04%
6M
13.58%
1Y
27.88%
3Y*
20.99%
5Y*
11.79%
10Y*
10.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLV vs. VYMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
-0.98%14.50%2.47%2.07%-2.08%26.04%13.30%20.45%6.28%21.77%
VYMI
Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF
10.04%38.05%7.06%17.07%-7.02%15.39%-1.11%18.43%-12.65%22.36%

Correlation

The correlation between XLV and VYMI is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2016

0.53

The correlation between XLV and VYMI shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (3 years) to 0.53 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLV vs. VYMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLV
VYMI

Healthcare

100.0%
6.6%

Basic Materials

-

6.8%

Communication Services

-

4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

6.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.0%

Energy

-

9.5%

Financial Services

-

41.9%

Industrials

-

6.6%

Real Estate

-

1.3%

Technology

-

4.3%

Utilities

-

5.6%

Healthcare

XLV
100.0%
VYMI
6.6%

Basic Materials

XLV

-

VYMI
6.8%

Communication Services

XLV

-

VYMI
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

XLV

-

VYMI
6.5%

Consumer Defensive

XLV

-

VYMI
7.0%

Energy

XLV

-

VYMI
9.5%

Financial Services

XLV

-

VYMI
41.9%

Industrials

XLV

-

VYMI
6.6%

Real Estate

XLV

-

VYMI
1.3%

Technology

XLV

-

VYMI
4.3%

Utilities

XLV

-

VYMI
5.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLV vs. VYMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLV
XLV Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
XLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLV Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
XLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

VYMI
VYMI Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VYMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYMI Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VYMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYMI Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLV vs. VYMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLVVYMIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.39

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

2.76

-1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.60

10.83

-7.23

XLV vs. VYMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the VYMI Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLV and VYMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLVVYMIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

2.14

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.80

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.63

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.64

-0.18

Drawdowns

XLV vs. VYMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLV drawdown since its inception was -39.17%, roughly equal to the maximum VYMI drawdown of -40.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLV and VYMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLVVYMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.17%

-40.00%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.47%

-10.14%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.11%

-12.84%

-4.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.11%

-24.05%

+6.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.40%

-40.00%

+11.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.32%

-2.52%

-1.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.12%

-6.31%

-0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.35%

2.58%

+1.77%

Volatility

XLV vs. VYMI - Volatility Comparison

State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) has a higher volatility of 5.02% compared to Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI) at 3.69%. This indicates that XLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLVVYMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.02%

3.69%

+1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.66%

10.94%

-0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.99%

13.13%

+1.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.76%

14.87%

-0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.58%

16.88%

-0.30%

XLV vs. VYMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VYMI's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLV vs. VYMI - Dividend Comparison

XLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than VYMI's 3.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VYMI
Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF
3.48%3.68%4.84%4.58%4.70%4.30%3.22%4.20%4.29%3.21%2.39%0.00%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.64%1.60%1.67%1.59%1.47%1.33%1.49%2.17%1.57%1.47%1.60%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLV and VYMI have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLV has higher volatility (5.02%) compared to VYMI (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLV dropped -39.17% vs VYMI's -40.00%.

On 10-year performance, VYMI leads with 10.62% vs 9.65% for XLV. On fees, VYMI is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VYMI has been the lower-risk option at 3.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VYMI has performed better with a 10.62% return vs 9.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYMI is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLV.

VYMI has the higher dividend yield at 3.48%, compared with 1.64% for XLV.

XLV is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while VYMI is Dividend. XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index, while VYMI tracks FTSE All-World ex US High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLV and 0.07% for VYMI.

VYMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLV and VYMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer