XLV vs. SCHP

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) and SCHP (Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLV is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index, while SCHP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLV returned 9.65%/yr vs 2.53%/yr for SCHP. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. XLV charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHP.

Performance

XLV vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLV achieves a -0.98% return, which is significantly lower than SCHP's 0.96% return. Over the past 10 years, XLV has outperformed SCHP with an annualized return of 9.65%, while SCHP has yielded a comparatively lower 2.53% annualized return.

XLV

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 6.38%
• YTD: -0.98%
• 6M: 1.65%
• 1Y: 15.62%
• 3Y*: 7.16%
• 5Y*: 6.05%
• 10Y*: 9.65%

SCHP

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -0.89%
• YTD: 0.96%
• 6M: 0.95%
• 1Y: 4.80%
• 3Y*: 3.84%
• 5Y*: 1.02%
• 10Y*: 2.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLV vs. SCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF	-0.98%	14.50%	2.47%	2.07%	-2.08%	26.04%	13.30%	20.45%	6.28%	21.77%
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF	0.96%	6.76%	1.95%	3.91%	-12.02%	5.87%	10.86%	8.52%	-1.78%	3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between XLV and SCHP is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2010	-0.05

The correlation between XLV and SCHP shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.19 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLV vs. SCHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLV	SCHP
Healthcare	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	100.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.0%
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XLV vs. SCHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLV

XLV Risk / Return Rank: 32
XLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
XLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
XLV Omega Ratio Rank: 31
XLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
XLV Martin Ratio Rank: 28

SCHP

SCHP Risk / Return Rank: 49
SCHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
SCHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
SCHP Omega Ratio Rank: 45
SCHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
SCHP Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLV vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XLV	SCHP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.05	1.47	-0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.68	2.23	-0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.26	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.50	2.50	-1.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.60	7.59	-3.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XLV vs. SCHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is comparable to the SCHP Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLV and SCHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XLV	SCHP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.05	1.47	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	0.17	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58	0.45	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.50	-0.03

Drawdowns

XLV vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLV drawdown since its inception was -39.17%, which is greater than SCHP's maximum drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLV and SCHP.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLV	SCHP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.17%	-14.26%	-24.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.47%	-1.93%	-8.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.11%	-4.48%	-12.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.11%	-14.26%	-2.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.40%	-14.26%	-14.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.32%	-0.89%	-3.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.12%	-3.93%	-3.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.35%	0.63%	+3.72%

Volatility

XLV vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison

State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) has a higher volatility of 5.02% compared to Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) at 1.00%. This indicates that XLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLV	SCHP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.02%	1.00%	+4.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.66%	2.24%	+8.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.99%	3.29%	+11.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.76%	6.12%	+8.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.58%	5.59%	+10.99%

XLV vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHP's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XLV vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison

XLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than SCHP's 4.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF	4.01%	4.06%	2.99%	3.02%	7.19%	4.39%	1.11%	2.02%	2.26%	1.90%	1.38%	0.28%
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF	1.64%	1.60%	1.67%	1.59%	1.47%	1.33%	1.49%	2.17%	1.57%	1.47%	1.60%	1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLV and SCHP in my portfolio?

XLV and SCHP have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XLV or SCHP?

XLV has higher volatility (5.02%) compared to SCHP (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLV dropped -39.17% vs SCHP's -14.26%.

Which ETF is better, XLV or SCHP?

On 10-year performance, XLV leads with 9.65% vs 2.53% for SCHP. On fees, SCHP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHP has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XLV or SCHP?

Over the 10-year period, XLV has performed better with a 9.65% return vs 2.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLV or SCHP?

SCHP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLV or SCHP?

SCHP has the higher dividend yield at 4.01%, compared with 1.64% for XLV.

What is the main difference between XLV and SCHP?

XLV is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while SCHP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index, while SCHP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLV and 0.03% for SCHP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.