PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLV vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLV vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLV achieves a -0.98% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 16.71% return. Over the past 10 years, XLV has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 9.65%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.59% annualized return.


XLV

1D
-0.24%
1M
6.38%
YTD
-0.98%
6M
1.65%
1Y
15.62%
3Y*
7.16%
5Y*
6.05%
10Y*
9.65%

QQQ

1D
1.56%
1M
0.68%
YTD
16.71%
6M
15.00%
1Y
35.78%
3Y*
27.15%
5Y*
16.98%
10Y*
21.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLV vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
-0.98%14.50%2.47%2.07%-2.08%26.04%13.30%20.45%6.28%21.77%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
16.71%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between XLV and QQQ is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 1999

0.60

Over the past year, the correlation between XLV and QQQ has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XLV vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLV
QQQ

Healthcare

100.0%
4.2%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

0.6%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Industrials

-

2.8%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

-

53.8%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Healthcare

XLV
100.0%
QQQ
4.2%

Basic Materials

XLV

-

QQQ
1.1%

Communication Services

XLV

-

QQQ
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XLV

-

QQQ
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

XLV

-

QQQ
7.7%

Energy

XLV

-

QQQ
0.6%

Financial Services

XLV

-

QQQ
0.2%

Industrials

XLV

-

QQQ
2.8%

Real Estate

XLV

-

QQQ
0.1%

Technology

XLV

-

QQQ
53.8%

Utilities

XLV

-

QQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLV vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLV
XLV Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
XLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLV Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
XLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLV vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLVQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.38

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

3.00

-1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.60

11.43

-7.84

XLV vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLV and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLVQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

2.15

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.76

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.97

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.40

+0.06

Drawdowns

XLV vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLV drawdown since its inception was -39.17%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLV and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLVQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.17%

-82.97%

+43.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.47%

-11.96%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.11%

-22.77%

+5.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.11%

-35.12%

+18.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.40%

-35.12%

+6.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.32%

-4.03%

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.12%

-32.77%

+25.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.35%

3.14%

+1.21%

Volatility

XLV vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) is 5.02%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 6.84%. This indicates that XLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLVQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.02%

6.84%

-1.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.66%

13.20%

-2.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.99%

16.74%

-1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.76%

22.49%

-7.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.58%

22.36%

-5.78%

XLV vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLV vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

XLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than QQQ's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.39%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.64%1.60%1.67%1.59%1.47%1.33%1.49%2.17%1.57%1.47%1.60%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLV and QQQ have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to XLV (5.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLV dropped -39.17% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.59% vs 9.65% for XLV. On fees, XLV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLV has been the lower-risk option at 5.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.59% return vs 9.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQ.

XLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.39% for QQQ.

XLV is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLV and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLV and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer